Cont: The Biden Presidency (3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That could be determined with a private phone call well before any action: "Hey, Jerome, this is Joe. If I sent you a big shiny coin worth a lot of money, what would you do with it?"
Will it fit into a vending machine? I have a craving for one of the colas in the cafeteria.
 
Will it fit into a vending machine? I have a craving for one of the colas in the cafeteria.


There's already a one ounce $100 platinum coin. They just have to change some words and hit the button.
How it works: The U.S. Mint, which Diehl ran from 1994 to 2000, already produces a one-ounce Platinum Eagle and has no shortage of platinum blanks already in stock.

Producing a trillion-dollar Eagle would require only the denomination to be changed. "This could be quickly executed on the existing plaster mold of the Platinum Eagle," says Diehl. Then an automated process would transfer the new design to a plastic resin mold.
https://www.axios.com/2021/10/05/trillion-dollar-platinum-coin-mint-janet-yellen
https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/american-eagle/platinum-bullion
 
There's already a one ounce $100 platinum coin. They just have to change some words and hit the button.

How it works: The U.S. Mint, which Diehl ran from 1994 to 2000, already produces a one-ounce Platinum Eagle and has no shortage of platinum blanks already in stock.

Producing a trillion-dollar Eagle would require only the denomination to be changed. "This could be quickly executed on the existing plaster mold of the Platinum Eagle," says Diehl. Then an automated process would transfer the new design to a plastic resin mold.

https://www.axios.com/2021/10/05/trillion-dollar-platinum-coin-mint-janet-yellen
https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/american-eagle/platinum-bullion

It might be better if it had a different kind of bird. You know, the kind you flip somebody.
 
I think the voters are kind of bored by Biden by now. And I think he would run a poor campaign against De Santis. He was all fired up by Trump. Now he is seen as bureaucrat. Something like a school principal.

Democrats have a tough decision. If you start pushing another candidate, the current one looks like a loser. And you lose votes no matter what. Yet there is no way to add much excitement to Biden at this point. The Hunter Biden laptop committee needs to be ridiculed quite early with their task. We don't want "but his laptop" hanging around as a message to 2024.

The FBI should really come out and release something, but they never do if there are no charges to be filed. And all the charges to Hunter will be taxes, not the fictional laptop.
 
... The FBI should really come out and release something, but they [almost never] never do if there are no charges to be filed. And all the charges to Hunter will be taxes, not the fictional laptop.
ftfy

The one relevant exception was Comey's reveal they were investigating more Clinton emails.
 
The FBI should really come out and release something, but they never do if there are no charges to be filed. And all the charges to Hunter will be taxes, not the fictional laptop.

Fictional? As far as I know, there are no claims by the principle parties that the laptop is somehow fake or altered. Not now anyway. All have come to agree that is was Hunter's and the contents are validated.
Who told you it was fictional? What is the source?

eta: the solution is for Biden just not to run. Then no one cares so much about all the deals with Russia or China Hunter made - and cashed in on.
We just move on to a younger generation of candidates and let Joe retire.
 
Last edited:
Fictional? As far as I know, there are no claims by the principle parties that the laptop is somehow fake or altered. Not now anyway. All have come to agree that is was Hunter's and the contents are validated.
Who told you it was fictional? What is the source?

I'm not certain that "principle parties" matters much here, honestly, under the circumstances, especially when the actual comment offered has been very limited.

When it comes to the information available, there do seem to be no credible claims that the laptop's fake and credible claims that it actually was Hunter's, sure. There was initial doubt about its reality, of course, given the Republican clown show surrounding it, which gave rise to very real uncertainty about how much fiction is involved. As for altered, on the other hand - at last check, the current state of things was that some specific things on it have indeed been verified, but not any of the potentially more problematic stuff and that, given the evidence at hand about multiple rounds of later alterations in at least some files, it's impossible to validly claim that the laptop is unaltered. Rather, it seems far more true to say that the extent of alteration is largely unverifiable. It's certainly possible that the FBI may be working to investigate further based on potential leads from the laptop, but that's far cry from it being fully validated.
 
Last edited:
I'm not certain that "principle parties" matters much here, honestly, under the circumstances, especially when the actual comment offered has been very limited.

When it comes to the information available, there do seem to be no credible claims that the laptop's fake and credible claims that it actually was Hunter's, sure. There was initial doubt about its reality, of course, given the Republican clown show surrounding it, which gave rise to very real uncertainty about how much fiction is involved. As for altered, on the other hand - at last check, the current state of things was that some specific things on it have indeed been verified, but not any of the potentially more problematic stuff and that, given the evidence at hand about multiple rounds of later alterations in at least some files, it's impossible to validly claim that the laptop is unaltered. Rather, it seems far more true to say that the extent of alteration is largely unverifiable. It's certainly possible that the FBI may be working to investigate further based on potential leads from the laptop, but that's far cry from it being fully validated.

I agree that while the emails are validated, they might be just Hunter boasting of his Dad's involvement, banking on his last name for $$$, ie, lying about it. ( all the tabloid-y sex and drug stuff can be ignored). Or that some of it came as Joe had already left the VP office, so no power connection.

However, we have Joe claiming that he has a close relationship with Hunter, we know he took him on AF2 to China for a business trip while VP, and it is confirmed that Joe met with some of these foreign business partners outside and inside at the White House on a few occasions.
We also have Joe claiming he never discussed his son's business deals with him.

Do you believe Joe knew nothing of it, even though he was in charge of dealings with the countries Hunter was dealing with and had met these people? I think it is a huge stretch to say Joe didn't know anything of it.
 
Last edited:
Fictional? As far as I know, there are no claims by the principle parties that the laptop is somehow fake or altered. Not now anyway. All have come to agree that is was Hunter's and the contents are validated.Who told you it was fictional? What is the source?

eta: the solution is for Biden just not to run. Then no one cares so much about all the deals with Russia or China Hunter made - and cashed in on.
We just move on to a younger generation of candidates and let Joe retire.

No, they haven't. And Hunter Biden's laptop doesn't exist. What exists is the image of hard drive reportedly from his laptop.


Why would Hunter Biden run? I have yet to see any contents that show that he did anything illegal
 
Do you believe Joe knew nothing of it, even though he was in charge of dealings with the countries Hunter was dealing with and had met these people? I think it is a huge stretch to say Joe didn't know anything of it.

Mmm. To put it simply, I believe that Joe fairly certainly understood what Hunter was trying to do, generally speaking, and what the intent of the other parties was, generally speaking. It's not too hard to understand that that put him into a delicate position. As far as the evidence that I've seen goes, though, I haven't seen anything that would actually indicate that Joe actually did anything corrupt.

To poke at your examples there more directly - taking his son with him and helping him make contacts is a grey area, certainly, even if it could somehow be justified in the specific context, and could easily be used to facilitate corruption for those so inclined, but is not even remotely proof of wrongdoing by anyone involved itself. Meeting businessmen who happen to be associated with Hunter Biden in the White House is also a potential grey area, but that one requires more context for the specific situations to actually say much of anything.
 
Fictional? As far as I know, there are no claims by the principle parties that the laptop is somehow fake or altered. Not now anyway. All have come to agree that is was Hunter's and the contents are validated.
Who told you it was fictional? What is the source?

eta: the solution is for Biden just not to run. Then no one cares so much about all the deals with Russia or China Hunter made - and cashed in on.
We just move on to a younger generation of candidates and let Joe retire.

Show me where Hunter says yes it's my laptop.
 
Mmm. To put it simply, I believe that Joe fairly certainly understood what Hunter was trying to do, generally speaking, and what the intent of the other parties was, generally speaking. It's not too hard to understand that that put him into a delicate position. As far as the evidence that I've seen goes, though, I haven't seen anything that would actually indicate that Joe actually did anything corrupt.

To poke at your examples there more directly - taking his son with him and helping him make contacts is a grey area, certainly, even if it could somehow be justified in the specific context, and could easily be used to facilitate corruption for those so inclined, but is not even remotely proof of wrongdoing by anyone involved itself. Meeting businessmen who happen to be associated with Hunter Biden in the White House is also a potential grey area, but that one requires more context for the specific situations to actually say much of anything.

This kind of thing happens every day in politics and business. It certainly is unfair to those without the connections. Look at Hollywood. Children of famous actors, directors and producers have a leg up on Joe Schmoe. But I see nothing illegal.

If you think we live in a meritocracy, you're naive.
 
Show me where Hunter says yes it's my laptop.
IIRC he said it was his and at one point he left at the repair shop. After that however the hard drive was copied and the FBI took possession of the laptop making everything claimed to be on the laptop hard drive suspect.

But seriously, Hunter took advantage of his dad's position. Years later Biden says he believes it was his son's drug addiction and his son has since cleaned up.

You can't control your relatives, kids or parents. I think Biden has addressed the matter sufficiently and the GOP would be going on and on about Hunter regardless. Just look at the GOP history of idiocy from the Vince Foster suicide to Benghazi to EmptyG claiming Biden and the deep state murdered JFK Jr.
 
I agree that while the emails are validated, they might be just Hunter boasting of his Dad's involvement, banking on his last name for $$$, ie, lying about it. ( all the tabloid-y sex and drug stuff can be ignored). Or that some of it came as Joe had already left the VP office, so no power connection.

However, we have Joe claiming that he has a close relationship with Hunter, we know he took him on AF2 to China for a business trip while VP, and it is confirmed that Joe met with some of these foreign business partners outside and inside at the White House on a few occasions.
We also have Joe claiming he never discussed his son's business deals with him.

Do you believe Joe knew nothing of it, even though he was in charge of dealings with the countries Hunter was dealing with and had met these people? I think it is a huge stretch to say Joe didn't know anything of it.
We do know that the freakiest of the freaky GOPers have had access to the laptop content for three years and have yet to come up with anything solid on President Biden despite having every reason to do so. That fact alone should tell you how surprising the hearings will be...
 
We do know that the freakiest of the freaky GOPers have had access to the laptop content for three years and have yet to come up with anything solid on President Biden despite having every reason to do so. That fact alone should tell you how surprising the hearings will be...

The laptop is just a piece of a puzzle. But it doesnt matter. Both sides have their shenannigans that profit off of their positions.
As a sitting president, he is protected from a full criminal case, which he should not go through anyway as his mental state is in serious decline.

He wont run again - I am 100% sure of it - and I'm beginning to think they (democrats) are actually trying to have him resign. They are just going after him too hard.
Expect a new slant to a negative story every day, and CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS will run it. That is how you will know. They wont bury it or 'nothingburger' it.

Maybe they will give him a break before the State of the Union on Feb 7. No one wants to hurt the party as a whole for 2024 or give the GOP too much ammo to use. But after that, he has just a week or 2 to announce.
 
The laptop is just a piece of a puzzle. But it doesnt matter. Both sides have their shenannigans that profit off of their positions.
As a sitting president, he is protected from a full criminal case, which he should not go through anyway as his mental state is in serious decline.

He wont run again - I am 100% sure of it - and I'm beginning to think they (democrats) are actually trying to have him resign. They are just going after him too hard.
Expect a new slant to a negative story every day, and CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS will run it. That is how you will know. They wont bury it or 'nothingburger' it.

Maybe they will give him a break before the State of the Union on Feb 7. No one wants to hurt the party as a whole for 2024 or give the GOP too much ammo to use. But after that, he has just a week or 2 to announce.

For the life of me I don't understand why you say all this. I see false equivalencies and a sort of arrogant predictions.

Who's going to take the nomination then? Gavin Newsom? Pete Buttegieg? Who? I don't see Kamala Harris being the nominee. I would love someone more dynamic and younger. But not just anyone. I want a nominee that will win.
 
IIRC he said it was his and at one point he left at the repair shop. After that however the hard drive was copied and the FBI took possession of the laptop making everything claimed to be on the laptop hard drive suspect.

But seriously, Hunter took advantage of his dad's position. Years later Biden says he believes it was his son's drug addiction and his son has since cleaned up.

You can't control your relatives, kids or parents. I think Biden has addressed the matter sufficiently and the GOP would be going on and on about Hunter regardless. Just look at the GOP history of idiocy from the Vince Foster suicide to Benghazi to EmptyG claiming Biden and the deep state murdered JFK Jr.

I haven't seen anywhere that Hunter Biden has confirmed any part of the story about the laptop. I challenge you or anyone to present such evidence. It might be Hunter's, but the story about it being taken into repair is highly suspicious.

Including the repair guy copying the image or contacting the FBI. If in fact, Hunter Biden dropped it off repair and just left it there, the appropriate action would have been to wipe the disk and sell the laptop. The information on it doesn't belong to him? What business is it of his to copy the drive?

If I'm the FBI, I'm returning it to its rightful owner as opposed to looking at what info is on the hard drive. And unless they have a reason to suspect Hunter Biden of a crime and obtained a search warrant, they have no business keeping it.
 
I haven't seen anywhere that Hunter Biden has confirmed any part of the story about the laptop. I challenge you or anyone to present such evidence. It might be Hunter's, but the story about it being taken into repair is highly suspicious.

Including the repair guy copying the image or contacting the FBI. If in fact, Hunter Biden dropped it off repair and just left it there, the appropriate action would have been to wipe the disk and sell the laptop. The information on it doesn't belong to him? What business is it of his to copy the drive?

If I'm the FBI, I'm returning it to its rightful owner as opposed to looking at what info is on the hard drive. And unless they have a reason to suspect Hunter Biden of a crime and obtained a search warrant, they have no business keeping it.
Pretty flimsy denial, "it could have been mine".

NYPost
In a sitdown with CBS’s “Sunday Morning,” President Biden’s embattled son was pointedly asked “yes or no” if the MacBook Pro that was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019 was in fact his.

“I really don’t know what the answer is, that’s the truthful answer,” Hunter Biden said in an excerpt of the interview released on Friday, before adding, “I have no idea.”

But asked whether it could have belonged to him, he replied, “Certainly.”

And then we have this: NYPost: CBS ‘confirms’ Hunter Biden laptop is real 769 days after Post broke story
CBS News said Monday that it confirmed the authenticity of data from Hunter Biden’s former laptop — more than two years after The Post first revealed its contents — as the first son’s lawyer complained he didn’t “consent” to the release.

The laptop links President Biden to his son Hunter and brother Jim Biden’s foreign influence-peddling, but high-ranking former spy agency officials claimed before the 2020 election it was likely Russian disinformation and the story was censored by Twitter and Facebook.

Most news outlets ignored the laptop’s contents until recently. CBS’s report follows belated verification of the laptop in March by the Washington Post and New York Times.

It's at this point I say who cares? There is allegedly a lot of crap on that laptop about Hunter and nothing that includes evidence Biden was involved other than to not abandon his addicted son.

Why the FBI has held onto the actual laptop is an unknown.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom