The Anthrax Mystery: Solved ???

Are you just making stuff up?


No. After the first Gulf war, troops were left in Kuwait as a deterent against further Iraqi agggression. They rotated out about every 6 months, the size of the force is to me, unkown, but rest assured, it was enough.
 
Last edited:
No. After the first Gulf war, troops were left in Kuwait as a deterent against further Iraqi agggression. They rotated out about every 6 months, the size of the force is to me, unkown, but rest assured, it was enough.

You said "a mess" of troops.

How many is "a mess"?

Was that enough to invade Iraq?

:boxedin:
 
Yeah those smart jews planting anthrax with no evidence pointing to Iraq in order to get us to go to Iraq 2 years later. Oh wait, someone said it takes time. Oh, except for the little war we had a couple months after the attacks which were actually based on the attacks.
 
a mess is more than a bunch and less than a gaggle. I know there were at least 4 battalions of armor there at all times. what does that tell you?

It tells me that it was not enough to invade until the correct type and number were in theater.

Good news that you are not a general. ;)
 
It tells me that it was not enough to invade until the correct type and number were in theater.

Good news that you are not a general. ;)


Are you implying that we left a sizeable force there for 12 years for no other reason than to "go in later?"

And for the record, in late 2002 (December), my unit at the time, the 3rd Infantry Division was scheduled to go to Kuwait for it's 6 month rotation. They packed up and arrived in theater in February. I got there in March with the 4th Infantry after spending 5 weeks getting our tanks on the railhead, down to the port, and on the boat. 2 weeks to get to Turkey and another 2 and a half to turn around and go to Kuwait. Why?

Cause we had different tanks.

I cannot believe I have to explain this to you.
 
I don't agree with his assertion, but your presentation ignores the fact the national decisions do generally take time.

Armies no not move over night.

America Attacked - 9/11/2001
Afghanistan Conflict started - 7/10/2001

Think again skip

Pretty ironic when you see this post

JDG said:
If you are going to think then you must avoid the CT section.

Your mind will be better stimulated elsewhere.

In the quest to try and be a smart ass wisecracker, you insert foot in mouth yet again
 
America Attacked - 9/11/2001
Afghanistan Conflict started - 7/10/2001

I assume you have transposed the numbers in the second date above. Pretty sure the conflict did not start before the 9/11 attacks. ;)

Are you equating 4 weeks to overnight, which was the term I used?
 
MagZ- and your evidence is???

Oh wait, I forgot, sorry. Accusations against Israel and Jews don't require evidence.
 
Last edited:
Yes, without US government knowledge.

It was the Ames strain. However it was refined and prepared in Israel’s bioweapons lab in Nes Ziona by Jewish scientists who had worked in the Soviet Union.

Lots of countries had the means, but you've yet to show a connection between the Mossad and the Ames strain. This is usually done with a source, article, quotes, etc. Let's start with that and then evaluate the credibility of the source.
 
Lots of countries had the means, but you've yet to show a connection between the Mossad and the Ames strain. This is usually done with a source, article, quotes, etc. Let's start with that and then evaluate the credibility of the source.

The credibility of his claim to have a connection lies entirely in his mind: the Jews must have done it; therefore, Find the Jews in the case, and the case is solved.

Yes, Magz, we're talking about your anthrax claim. This is not a derail.
 
The credibility of his claim to have a connection lies entirely in his mind: the Jews must have done it; therefore, Find the Jews in the case, and the case is solved.

Yes, Magz, we're talking about your anthrax claim. This is not a derail.

It's unquestionable that discussions of an inside job have allowed many bigots and anti-semites an opportunity to voice their hate. Eric Hufschmid comes to mind.

The problem of course is that any legitimate research and scrutiny of Israel's Mossad, gov't, etc is dismissed out of hand for very much the same reason.
 
... and then the professional (or even amateur) Jewbaiters claim they are being suppressed, repressed, and oppressed.

Obviously it is more of a minefield than most. But there are plenty of legitimate criticisms, and critics, of Israeli policies and politics. Or of Jewish-American. If that is an area where you wish to go. The generic "you," not the personal one, necessarily.

One way to consider sources is this (I think). Some people, like Magz, in researching, look first for the Jew in the case, and then work backwards to try and prove the link. (Well, many of them don't even work backwards. They just play "spot the Jew" and once they have found one, consider their work done.) Beware of that "researcher."

Magz's ideas, in at least the Anthrax case, are based on "spot the Jew." One thing to note is that the government of Israel is to a significant degree dependent on the US; and there are many, many close personal ties between the countries. What kind of goddamned fools would jeopardize that relationship by (for example) attacking the WTC with dancing intelligence agents; or sending out anthrax spores which could be traced back to them. The mind reels.

This is also one of the telltale signs of the serious Jewbaiter; to him, Jews are, simultaneously, all-knowing and all-powerful, and also damned fools who put their whole people in danger by crude manipulation.

If Magz is still listening, he will dismiss my comments since I am Jewish, and both incredibly cunning and clumsily manipulative.

Where's Randi... I will claim my prize...
 
It's unquestionable that discussions of an inside job have allowed many bigots and anti-semites an opportunity to voice their hate. Eric Hufschmid comes to mind.

The problem of course is that any legitimate research and scrutiny of Israel's Mossad, gov't, etc is dismissed out of hand for very much the same reason.
Feel free to show us the "legitimate research and scrutiny of Israel's Mossad, gov't, etc" that has been dismissed out of hand here.

On topic, feel free to show us any EVIDENCE that MaGZ has ever provided for his silly claims about Jews, Israel, etc.

Hiding behind the generic (and false) "if you criticize Israel you will be labeled an antisemite" mantra won't do.

ETA: or what SDC wrote. ;)
 
Last edited:
I assume you have transposed the numbers in the second date above. Pretty sure the conflict did not start before the 9/11 attacks. ;)

Are you equating 4 weeks to overnight, which was the term I used?

Indeed, mixing US and Euro date formatting, bad dates

From attacks to starting a war in 4 weeks is not taking time as you also claimed skip. You know what you tried to counter and imply

Still foot in mouth I'm afraid
 
He's right, the whole Afghan thing started years before 9/11, as did plans by the Clinton administration to invade Afghan which they never got around to doing.
 
Lots of countries had the means, but you've yet to show a connection between the Mossad and the Ames strain. This is usually done with a source, article, quotes, etc. Let's start with that and then evaluate the credibility of the source.
http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/anthraxhuntdentsconfidence.html
The speculation has been encouraged by the huge holes that remain in the investigation. So far, the only progress has been technical. Scientists consulted by the government have identified the anthrax as coming from the Ames strain. This strain - developed from natural sources in the US - was first used in American bioweapons research in the early 1980s and is probably available to weapons researchers in the UK, Canada and Israel as well.
 
No replies, apparently I made my case that Israel has the Ames strain and a biological weapons program. This is so typical of the debunkers here, once I provide evidence everyone shuts up.
 
No replies, apparently I made my case that Israel has the Ames strain and a biological weapons program. This is so typical of the debunkers here, once I provide evidence everyone shuts up.

Nah, I just thought you'd had the good sense and good taste to disappear again. My mistake.

I note that your quote also refers to the UK and Canada, not only Israel. But look on the bright side; perhaps it was British and Canadian Jews who did it.

"Keep on the sunny side, always on the sunny side/
Keep on the sunny side of life..."
 

Back
Top Bottom