jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
methinks, Minadin, that ronpaulisright simply will not address topics that are too tough for him to fit into his conspiratorial mind.
To your point, if it can be shown that the coin he saw pictures of are no more than a novelty item produced by an artist responding to a 'what if', it would illustrate the folly of his original post and cast doubts on his contentions.
To my point, he would have to attempt to back up a bald contention of his, that there are Biblical passages that either directly, or in interpretation, state that in the year which we date as 2015 the antichrist will rise to world power and domination and that said antichrist is at this time known as Prince William of England. Given that I know for fact that William is not mentioned by name and that the year 2015 is also not literally named , anywhere in the Bible it is quite obvious that such contention is an interpretation by someone. Addressing my questions would require that rpir let us all see the reasoning used in this interpretation and he knows that it will open that reasoning up to close inspection. His mind may not be able to cope with the arguements that will inevitably result.
Then again he could prove me wrong , or at least attempt to do so.
So far, nada, zip, zilch, zero, goose egg, nothing, has been put forward.
To your point, if it can be shown that the coin he saw pictures of are no more than a novelty item produced by an artist responding to a 'what if', it would illustrate the folly of his original post and cast doubts on his contentions.
To my point, he would have to attempt to back up a bald contention of his, that there are Biblical passages that either directly, or in interpretation, state that in the year which we date as 2015 the antichrist will rise to world power and domination and that said antichrist is at this time known as Prince William of England. Given that I know for fact that William is not mentioned by name and that the year 2015 is also not literally named , anywhere in the Bible it is quite obvious that such contention is an interpretation by someone. Addressing my questions would require that rpir let us all see the reasoning used in this interpretation and he knows that it will open that reasoning up to close inspection. His mind may not be able to cope with the arguements that will inevitably result.
Then again he could prove me wrong , or at least attempt to do so.
So far, nada, zip, zilch, zero, goose egg, nothing, has been put forward.
