"The absolute, honest truth about UFOs"

And what you caught on camera are clouds. In fact not even interesting ones. If you are sincerely interested in learning more about what you saw, go to the Phil Plait blog at Slate. He has pi tures that will blow your mind.

However, if you prefer to wallow in ignorance, be my guest. But don't deceive yourself that people will not point out how silly your concludions about these are.

I don't have any conclusions. I,m looking for answers to what's being reported is all.
ETA: Why are folk being killed or fleeing?
 
Last edited:
Are you presenting these as evidence of how easily an uninformed observer might confuse clouds with 'flying saucers'?

I'm an uninformed observer looking for information. There is a solid form in that cloud, it flashed, and those things caught on camera during the eclipse have horns.
 
I don't have any conclusions. I,m looking for answers to what's being reported is all.

No, you are not. If you were sincere about what you claim, you would have done what I suggested by now. How difficult would it have been to do a google search and go to the suggested site?

I seem to be having trouble linking to a specific page, so I will post the link to the main blog:

www.slate.com/blog/bad_astronomy.

Do a search.
 
Image 1: Cloud in Chester UK 7th March 2015.
Image 2: Same image with decreased brightness and increased contracts.


Increased contracts, huh? Sounds legit.

There has been a lot of unexplainable shapes being captured on camera in the UK lately, some reached the news paper "Things with horns" I'm suspicious by it.


Unexplainable or unexplained? There's a difference. Have hope (that's the "thing with feathers")! I hold out the hope that you are a very young child for whom English is a second language.

You know, I took a photograph of some clouds and by using a simple technique I discovered that the sky is chock full of perfectly shaped squares arranged in a grid pattern. This leads me to think that The Borg have arrived and resistance is futile. I'm suspicious by it.
 
Last edited:
You might not be suspicious of what's being reported and that's fine. Why you have to scoff at those with questions is madness. I've simply uploaded a few images that caught my attention, and thought I'd share. Was there something wrong with that Don?

I had a scoff because you are shameless in your wilful determination to remain deluded.

We have seen this movie before. Same story, different noise. Why should I, or anyone else here, engage you any further?

Is it going to be any different? Will you come to admit any impediment of your visual systems, of your mind? Will you admit of any error in your personality at all?

Or will you double-down and insist that you are right, all the time? Will you be so arrogant that all honest attempts to share what we know are rebuffed in a sociopathic monomania of repetition?

I think the last is more likely.

No, I will not give you an inch — for nonsense's damaging rule holds sway too far.
 
Indeed, a remarkable cloud day. I've only seen one or two clouds like it in all my life.

Did you take that photo?

I've never seen anything like it. I didn't take that image no but I thought it was the best image from a gallery that was set up online. I took some of the clouds that were close by.



I filtered these images the same way, and there was no solid form within them.



 
I'm an uninformed observer looking for information. There is a solid form in that cloud, it flashed, and those things caught on camera during the eclipse have horns.
Lightning is associated with clouds, and often occurs entirely within or obscured the cloud. What is your evidence that there was a solid form in the cloud - did you see something bounce off it?

The picture you say shows 'things' with horns looks to me like quite ordinary rain cloud filaments; I can't see the 'things' you think are there or why you call the indicated parts 'horns'. Do you see animal shapes there? I can make the lower ringed area into a vague white face looking down and to the left, but that's all that suggests itself.

Everyone knows you can see shapes and patterns in clouds according to your creativity and imagination; they have no significance - unless you find them troubling - and that isn't a cloud problem...
 
Lightning is associated with clouds, and often occurs entirely within or obscured the cloud. What is your evidence that there was a solid form in the cloud - did you see something bounce ofF it?

She mentioned a flash. This could be static discharge from charged particles, lightning, within the confines of the cloud. I have seen it often during ghe monsoons or the freak summer showers we have, or even the reflection of sunlight on an aircraft through the clouds maybe flashing through a gap.
 
Last edited:
Lightning is associated with clouds, and often occurs entirely within or obscured the cloud. What is your evidence that there was a solid form in the cloud - did you see something bounce off it?

The picture you say shows 'things' with horns looks to me like quite ordinary rain cloud filaments; I can't see the 'things' you think are there or why you call the indicated parts 'horns'. Do you see animal shapes there? I can make the lower ringed area into a vague white face looking down and to the left, but that's all that suggests itself.

Everyone knows you can see shapes and patterns in clouds according to your creativity and imagination; they have no significance - unless you find them troubling - and that isn't a cloud problem...

I saw it flickering a blue light. It wasn't one of the lenticular clouds, it was just an everyday cloud. I only took the image because it flickered.
 
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed quote moved to another thread, and response to it.
I was merely uploading suspicious images of a beautiful day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only suspicious thing in those pictures were your own "filtering" (your word if I remember correctly) and modification of images using an image editor.

Incidentally, answer this simple question. Do you intend to visit the site I mentioned? There are much more amazing images of clouds there, and also an explanation for why they are the way they are. There are also some that display the "fuel dump" that you claim to have witnessed.
 
I remember watching a television program called Project UFO, a fictionalised account of the USAF's Project Bluebook. I distinctly remember a character state something along the lines that their intension is not to prove that there are no UFOs, but collect evidence to prove the sightings. The fact is that such evidence was lacking.

What I am saying is that, a lot of us here would really like it if UFOs were real. However the sad fact is that, to date there has been no evidence whatsoever for extra-terrestrial vehicles of any kind.

Your cloud pictures are just that, nothing more. Even as you whine about how mean we are and refuse to believe you, you refuse to address specific queries, acknowledge perfectly reasonable explanations and worse of all refuse to even make an attempt to educate yourself despite being pointed to resources.

There is nothing wrong with being ignorant, everyone is about a lot of things. But wallowing in ignorance and considering it as ideal...well that is another matter altogether.
 
This image was found in The Daily Express. Not one, but two images of "Lord only knows" but each do have a horn. It was captured during the recent eclipse we had.
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_69623554b4f706fccc.jpg[/qimg]
It looks vaguely like leg x-ray to me.

Cassidy is doing what she does best...evidence for nothing.

Incidentally, is that the enterprise in the second picture.
No it's not, it's obviously a Constellation class cruiser.
 
cassidy and diamonds breaking? Hmmmm, the name isn't the same, but I seem to have heard about diamonds breaking not that long ago!! :)

I took a look at these latest posts in this topic today, because I have linked it to a topic on the GH forum about UFOs.
 

Back
Top Bottom