The 9/11 Conspiracy Facts

funk de fino said:
<snip>

your very crude and snide use of insults actually show how little you have, if you had more you would not need the resort to this tactic as it is a certain sign of someone who cannot debate properly

inference, interpretation, quote mining, cherry picking, hand waving, ignoring and insults are all you have
Click to expand...


QFE. This pretty well sums up every thread started by mjd here. Well put, funk.
 
mjd1982 said:
Well researched, o seeker of truth!

http://www.911blogger.com/blog/2189
Click to expand...
No wonder you've been hiding this! Should I feign surprise that it doesn't claim what you say it did?

From January 2001, the administration within Al Qaeda was, nevertheless, pretty transparent to both the eyes and ears of French spies. The authors of the document even detail disagreements between the terrorists on the specificities of the hijacking they were envisaging. But they were never in any doubt regarding their intention. Provisionally, the Jihadists favoured capturing a plane going from Frankfurt to the USA.
Click to expand...
Does your version of the conspiracy state that the 9/11 planes were actually hijacked in Frankfurt? If not, this doesn't support you at all.

They drew up a list of seven potential airline companies. 2 were finally chosen by the 9/11 criminals: American Airlines and United Airlines.
Click to expand...
Perhaps that was because AA and UAL were the only American carriers flying out of Frankfurt?

I'm absolutely bewildered that you interpret anything the French knew as "19 hijackers would take 4 planes on the US east coast and fly them into the WTC and DC.

You claimed that the Freench gave specific, actionable info as to the 9/11 hijackings. It is now clear that you stretched the truth either out of ignorance or malice.
 
mjd1982 said:
That it links to prison planet is neither here nor there. It links to a quore from the head of the biggest victims family group. This is the point. Had you any skills of analysis, you would not need me to tell you this.

I am snide from time to time here. This is true. However, I think I am in my rights to , since this is the tone adopted by the OTers here to any CTer who appears. It is the tone of the mods as well, in my experience. You are just having a taste of your own medicine, and you dont like it. That is no ones problem but your own.

If people are willing to entertain civil discourse, then this is what will be prusued.
Click to expand...

Again an insult. I could quite clearly read what was in the article.

A quote from one person. Was he speaking on behalf of all the members of his group and excatly how large is his group? I bet it is not 50% of all the family members like you state in your blog. You cannot simply expect to get away with making ludicrous claims like this. This means you are either mistaken and you will edit the blog or you are being deceitful on purpose.

You tell me which it is

You are snide most of the time and even when people are civil they are insulted by you for the crime of disagreeing with you, not for being uncivil to you. That you cannot see this is pretty sad IMO as you seem intelligent but lack the proper skills to push your agenda further by making yourself look pompous, insulting and rude instead of allowing the attacks and fighting them with your facts (sic) so that it is the other side who look childish

You use the very tactic derided by people in the TM when used by non TM members. It does you no favours at all, especially with lurkers and these are the most important people on this board, I think you will agree.
 
OK People, please stop personalising this discussion. Stop bickering and passing insults back and forth, or further mod action will follow.

Either discuss the topic, or let the thread die.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
WildCat said:
No wonder you've been hiding this! Should I feign surprise that it doesn't claim what you say it did?


Does your version of the conspiracy state that the 9/11 planes were actually hijacked in Frankfurt? If not, this doesn't support you at all.


Perhaps that was because AA and UAL were the only American carriers flying out of Frankfurt?

I'm absolutely bewildered that you interpret anything the French knew as "19 hijackers would take 4 planes on the US east coast and fly them into the WTC and DC.

You claimed that the Freench gave specific, actionable info as to the 9/11 hijackings. It is now clear that you stretched the truth either out of ignorance or malice.
Click to expand...
#1 Provisionally.

#2 They did have specific warnings. AQ were plotting to hijack AA and Utd airlines planes. Tell me what the gov did to warn these 2 airlines/their passengers of this.
 
chillzero said:
OK People, please stop personalising this discussion. Stop bickering and passing insults back and forth, or further mod action will follow.

Either discuss the topic, or let the thread die.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
Click to expand...
I agree! Back to foreknowledge people! Start addressing some points!
 
mjd1982 said:
#2 They did have specific warnings. AQ were plotting to hijack AA and Utd airlines planes. Tell me what the gov did to warn these 2 airlines/their passengers of this.
Click to expand...

Tell me what the German government did about this.
 
Ah, mjd1982... came here so arrogant and full of himself, then ran away never to return.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom