#1- If you and I are aware of them, you think his employers of at least 6 years will not be?
#2- He has stated that he is being hassled by them to keep quiet.
I'm sorry, but with posts like the above, what else do you expect? You know what the facts are, you know that FT will be aware of what he has said (if you are not stupid), and you must know that he is being hassled, hence why he isnt coming out and telling everyone his story as he otherwise might. I have met him, I have relayed all this to you. So why do you continue playing silly buggers if you are interested in the facts? Leave that to the other clowns on this thread
Right. So the Met are going to go to the US and uncover the 911 plot. What planet do you live on? How could such an occurrence ever be possible?
???
I just gave you the answer, worthless though it is. What the hell are you talking about?
No, I said it has been scrubbed from the official record, according to Scott. I cannot recall the record he was talking about; my statement may be taken at face value then.
(sigh) I dont give a s***!
I said substantial
as above. enough of the barrister tactics please, we are intereste din the truth, not winning or losing
If that is the case, then so be it
Listen. As with the rest of the gang, you allow yourself to be deliberately obtuse when you dont want to understand something. Realise that to implicate FT, he does not have to say the words "I hereby impicate FT". No. He simply has to relate a story that implicates FT by simple inference- something which you guys are not fond of when it doesnt suit your ends. In stating that they participated in the power down, and in that they havent come clean about it, informed the authorities to look into it etc, they are part of the cover up by implication, in his eyes.
I have asked you guys to address this point for many pages now, and nothing. Not even an admission, as I have willingly done, that it is an "anomaly". Astonishing dishonesty on all of your parts.
I'm gonna give you all another day, and then its back to PNAC.
It was relevant to the point I was making. Re read
a lot of what?
have you ever seen a 911 CT survey? Google it
???
Where have you seen this advertised?
you tell me? or better still i will email them
you have no proof he is being "hassled"
snide and rude again
same reason they were able to investigate the litvenenko case? this investigation did not only take place on british soil, they went abroad to investigate
if people like avery and jones can uncover smoking guns then i'm sure the METs finest could if there were any
simple, would you go to the authorities if you were in scotts position
of course it has, very handy, you have no proof so we ignore the claim
rudeness again, you infer i make facist remarks or am indeed a facist, please retract
not your initial claim and again well avoided, you said his claims did not change, they did, that is the truth
again well avoided, these other companies have no scott forbes type of whistle blower working for them? or the imaginary official records that they would have to purge, how many other companies would have been involved in a complete power down of all floors from 50 up?
very strange that there has been nothing about any of them reported?
again this is your reading of what he has claimed, same as the PNAC, no-one else seems to agree that he is implicating FT, also rudeness again
it was irrelevant to the points we were discussing at the time, it was a sidetrack, if you are allowed them the so am i, and you said i was not?
protesters at ground zero on 911, you said a lot, how much is a lot?
next two posts you make
1. you show me any proof that 10's of millions of people think that bush and the administration deliberatly planned and executed a plan that would murder 3000 people so they could go to war, this is what you are claiming?
2.another avoidance, see above
you tell me mate, is it online advertising through truther sites and forums?
spew forth, it's all worth it.
