• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The "28 pages" thread

Maybe this will save the failed stand down nonsense.

FalseFlag has no idea this is bad news for CD, and the inside job.
 
Maybe this will save the failed stand down nonsense.

FalseFlag has no idea this is bad news for CD, and the inside job.
That's tough to say. It's a tough call because it's so clear that "truthers" know so little about what happened on 9/11/01. They've been told what to focus on and very few actually see past this to see the real picture.
 
That's tough to say. It's a tough call because it's so clear that "truthers" know so little about what happened on 9/11/01. They've been told what to focus on and very few actually see past this to see the real picture.

Persistent narrow focus is one of the reasons they are CT's.
 
They will also never understand why the decision to not turn the investigation into a witch hunt was one of the smartest things the commission did.
or put another way
They will also never understand why the decision to turn the investigation into a white wash was one of the most cowardly and irresponsible things the commission did.

So does that now qualify me as a CT? Will this have any effect on my label as a fake truther? Surely my status as a plane hugger remains as I assume this cements a LIHOPer tag as well.

Just a pathetic LIOPing, plane hugging, fake truther CT. LOL!

Not a Federal Judge, or I would have known Iran was behind the 9-11 attacks.

Or a Prestigious Medal of Freedom Award recipient and co chair of the 9-11 Commission, like Lee Hamilton. If I was I'd know that these 28 pages are not interesting enough to look at, but insist no one else should look at them either.........


Hamilton told Newsweek that he did not favor declassification of the 28 pages from the congressional investigation, just his own 9/11 Commission report. “I do not favor the declassification” of the the congressional probe’s pages, he said in a telephone interview.
http://www.newsweek.com/saudi-arabi...ack-obama-prince-bandar-bin-sultan-bob-297170

He hasn't read them though.....but he still thinks no one else should read them either.....

He added that he had "never read" that section of the other probe and
“I don’t know what’s in it
.
http://www.newsweek.com/saudi-arabi...ack-obama-prince-bandar-bin-sultan-bob-297170

Why would he? No one ordered him to read them.

No one ever came to me and said you ought to read these pages.” (He later amended that to say, “I can’t say I’ve never read them; I have no recollection of having read them.”)
http://www.newsweek.com/saudi-arabi...ack-obama-prince-bandar-bin-sultan-bob-297170

Besides......it's just not very interesting, if you're co-chairman of a commission chartered to........

....prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/about/index.htm

It just wouldn't be very interesting. Heck....it's still not interesting to the 9-11 Commission Chairman......

He evinced no interest in reading them now. “I haven't asked. I don’t think I would,” he said.
http://www.newsweek.com/saudi-arabi...ack-obama-prince-bandar-bin-sultan-bob-297170

That guy is no LIHOPing CT, probably still a plane hugger though.
 
or put another way
They will also never understand why the decision to turn the investigation into a white wash was one of the most cowardly and irresponsible things the commission did.
.

Well that would be a way of thinking for the short sighted.

Don't put words in my mouth.
 
The comments have some classic 9/11 truth idiots, office fires can't cause the collapse... oops, office fires did.

Here's another classic:

The reality is this --- if you believe the official story you are a fool. The biggest "conspiracy theory" that has ever been devised is the one that said "19 amateur pilots with box cutters did 9/11".

Keeps me wondering where all of this comes from.
 
Here's another classic:

The reality is this --- if you believe the official story you are a fool. The biggest "conspiracy theory" that has ever been devised is the one that said "19 amateur pilots with box cutters did 9/11".

Keeps me wondering where all of this comes from.

You forget the "led by a man living in a cave on dialysis" bit.
 
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-b...use-and-word-that-declassification-of/2272945

It's happening, finally.

Of course, if they redact everything then the end result will be meaningless.

Thanks for the link!
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-b...use-and-word-that-declassification-of/2272945
Tampa Bay Timed said:
Graham told the Tampa Bay Times that Brett Holmgren, a senior policy adviser to the assistant to the president for Homeland Security, told him the declassification review of the documents withheld from a report issued by a Joint Congressional Commission in 2003 will soon be completed.

Graham, who asked the president to declassify the records more than two years ago, said he asked how soon he could expect a decision and was told “one or two months.”

Graham implies the decision will be to declassify, but apparently that's not what Holmgren said.
 
Given that we still have people arguing technical idiocies like CD I don't see any chance of reasoned discussion of the far more subtle issues in the arena of political mis/mal/nonfeasance.

Did I ever confess my naivety on entering WTC 9/11 discussion in Nov 2007. My plan - on a forum with no engineer posters - was "I'll help them clear up this engineering nonsense - i.e. "CD" - over the next week or two THEN we can discuss the serious stuff in the political domain."

Mmmm... not one of my best assessments. :o
 
Last edited:
Given that we still have people arguing technical idiocies like CD I don't see any chance of reasoned discussion of the far more subtle issues in the arena of political mis/mal/nonfeasance.

Did I ever confess my naivety on entering WTC 9/11 discussion in Nov 2007. My plan - on a forum with no engineer posters - was "I'll help them clear up this engineering nonsense - i.e. "CD" - over the next week or two THEN we can discuss the serious stuff in the political domain."

Mmmm... not one of my best assessments. :o

So you are slightly behind schedule,...
 
...aaaand the Saudis are starting to freak out about declassification.

(via today's NY Times):

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/1...allout-if-congress-passes-9-11-bill.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The Obama administration has lobbied Congress to block the bill’s passage, according to administration officials and congressional aides from both parties, and the Saudi threats have been the subject of intense discussions in recent weeks between lawmakers and officials from the State Department and the Pentagon. The officials have warned senators of diplomatic and economic fallout from the legislation.

Big O ain't helping things.
 
Can we sue McDonald's for aiding McVeigh with a hamburger when he rented the truck?
Will congress pass a bill we can hold McDonald's assets?

Will politics rule speculation...
 
Saudi Arabia Threatens To Liquidate Its Treasury Holdings If Congress Probes Its Role In Sept 11 Attacks

Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

A great read whatever you conclude .Believe it was Zero Hedge who chatted this one .
 
The Obama is clearly trying to cover up the fact that 9/11 was done by foreign terrorists.

Why would Saudi Arabia attack the US if they are close allies? I would love to know this, especially considering the relationship between the Bushes and the Saudi Royal family.

Is it possible that the Saudis were used as a front to obscure the money trail? Yes, anything is possible.
 
This thread needs a new title because you can bet there will be a new thread today on the Saudi threat.
 
Why would Saudi Arabia attack the US if they are close allies? I would love to know this, especially considering the relationship between the Bushes and the Saudi Royal family.

Is it possible that the Saudis were used as a front to obscure the money trail? Yes, anything is possible.
You do know the Saudis declaration puts an end to all of your CD nonsense? The "28 pages" are another nail in the "truther" coffin. I know you will not figure out why.
 

Back
Top Bottom