• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The "28 pages" thread

FalseFlag said:
From page 3, "This monograph does not attempt a comprehensive survey of all known data on al Qaeda financing and every government action to combat it."

Conclusion: The 9/11 CR is incomplete, and we need an investigation that will be a comprehensive survey of all known data.
Click to expand...


I can save everyone time and money. It was rich Arabs.

That will be $100,000. I take Bitcoin, or PayPal.
 
Axxman300 said:
I can save everyone time and money. It was rich Arabs.

That will be $100,000. I take Bitcoin, or PayPal.
Click to expand...
How can you be certain? Shouldn't we have an investigation to prove you're correct? Don't you want that to show the truthers how wrong they are?
 
FalseFlag said:
OK, so you won't rub the investigation in our face. Don't you think we should still have a real investigation?
Click to expand...

There was already an investigation, only paranoid delusional freaks, not able to understand simple science have trouble figuring out what happened that day.

15 years of failure and counting, 9/11 twoofers the most inept group of all time.

The lurkers are disappointed.
 
The other side of the coin of this legislation allowing 911 victims to sue governments that sponsored the attack, countries suing the US for collateral drone damages? South and Central Americans suing the US government for supporting terrorism in their countries? It's not like there isn't any evidence.
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
Did Ted Haggard or Jimmy Swaggert fly a plane into a building?
Do we know where the money came from to pay for the meth and hookers?
Click to expand...

Your evading again. No wonder you can never figure anything out.

I'd done.
 
Today's NY Post (the Post is a tabloid, lower journalism standards, but tenacious with NYC attitude, so it's always worth reading)

http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/

An investigator who worked with the JTTF in Washington complained that instead of investigating Bandar, the US government protected him — literally. He said the State Department assigned a security detail to help guard Bandar not only at the embassy, but also at his McLean, Va., mansion.

The source added that the task force wanted to jail a number of embassy employees, “but the embassy complained to the US attorney” and their diplomatic visas were revoked as a compromise.

Former FBI agent John Guandolo, who worked 9/11 and related al Qaeda cases out of the bureau’s Washington field office, says Bandar should have been a key suspect in the 9/11 probe.

“The Saudi ambassador funded two of the 9/11 hijackers through a third party,” Guandolo said. “He should be treated as a terrorist suspect, as should other members of the Saudi elite class who the US government knows are currently funding the global jihad.”

But Bandar held sway over the FBI.
Click to expand...

By the way, if there had been evidence of CD found at Ground Zero the NY Post would have run a special addition calling for heads on pikes. They're classy that way.
 
Bandar. Bandar? Hmmm. Where have I heard this name before? Did he have a nickname? If so, what was it, and who gave it to him?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
 
DGM said:
Seen it. I doubt it was 100% wrong. I don't doubt for a second there was Saudi involvement.
Click to expand...

Yep, its an open secret that members of the Saudi elite fund fundementalist terror organizations.

Now I gotta know, how does thus relate to any 9/11 CT, especially the well known and oft debated ones on this subforum?

I see nothing relating it to explosives or thermite, to fake or modified planes, or any other MIHOP speculation.

Nor does anything written so far tie it to a LIHOP story.

At best its a suggestion that the GWB admin wanted Saudi oil more than they wanted to prosecute rich Saudi benefactors of AQ.
 
jaydeehess said:
Yep, its an open secret that members of the Saudi elite fund fundementalist terror organizations.
Click to expand...
Bandar "Bush" was W's buddy. That is no secret.

Saudi Arabia was used to launder money. The people behind 9/11 gave the money to Saudi Arabia so it would look like it was coming from them. This way the money would be untraceable to its origins.

This is obvious. Deny it all you want, and I know you will.
 
FalseFlag said:
Bandar "Bush" was W's buddy. That is no secret.

Saudi Arabia was used to launder money. The people behind 9/11 gave the money to Saudi Arabia so it would look like it was coming from them. This way the money would be untraceable to its origins.

This is obvious. Deny it all you want, and I know you will.
Click to expand...
And who exactly did they "launder" money for? I'm sure you have actual evidence for your reply. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom