The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

[tsig]

False. The existence of the Operation Northwoods plan means that this thread is total nonsense.

Again, if a 9/11 inside job was impossible, why did our government waste time planning a similar 9/11-style inside job with Operation Northwoods back in '62?

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

Because they're corrupt and criminal.

 

[LSSBB]

You just defined every government truther on the board as well.

There aren't any government truthers on this board. If I am wrong, prove it.

 

[uke2se]

I'm more interested in his need to manufacture false victories.

That's just a defense mechanism. When someone spends a decade being proven wrong every time he makes his delusions heard, like SHC no doubt has, I'm certain the mental dams he is able to put up are incredible. We've already seen that he's not interested in any dialogue, nor any evidence. When he's called on his BS, he simply asks another question.

I hope someone writes a book on twoofer psychology. I'd read it. Scott Sommers, is this something you're looking into?

 

[carlitos]

That's just a defense mechanism. When someone spends a decade being proven wrong every time he makes his delusions heard, like SHC no doubt has, I'm certain the mental dams he is able to put up are incredible. We've already seen that he's not interested in any dialogue, nor any evidence. When he's called on his BS, he simply asks another question.

I hope someone writes a book on twoofer psychology. I'd read it. Scott Sommers, is this something you're looking into?

I would respectfully suggest that the poster in question hasn't spent "a decade" doing anything, as that would be more than half of his life. He learned some new "important information" about the Fed last September, and manic-trolled the JREF. Now, he has learned new "important information" about the 9/11 attacks, and is doing the same. Probably a victim of watching "Zeitgeist" online. Don't ascribe dedication and persistence where it hasn't been earned.

 

[LSSBB]

That's just a defense mechanism. When someone spends a decade being proven wrong every time he makes his delusions heard, like SHC no doubt has, I'm certain the mental dams he is able to put up are incredible. We've already seen that he's not interested in any dialogue, nor any evidence. When he's called on his BS, he simply asks another question.

I hope someone writes a book on twoofer psychology. I'd read it. Scott Sommers, is this something you're looking into?

Don't forget his main thing, a total refusal to acknowledge he owns the burden of proof.



Zardoz is all knowing. Tiny humans must prove Zardoz wrong.

 

[beachnut]

It's irrelevant that Northwoods was rejected. ... Check and mate, pal.

It makes your evil government did it false. The government took a crazy plan and did not do it. You use the plan as proof of what? You lied about Northwoods, you said it called for the murder of Americans, and now you changed your claim to murder in war. Are deaths in war murder? For a plan never done? Why do you hate your government? Did you fail to vote?

 

[SpringHallConvert]

Your entire argument "The government is evil".

Well, it is, you just haven't caught onto that simple fact yet.

 

[SpringHallConvert]

You lied about Northwoods, you said it called for the murder of Americans, and now you changed your claim to murder in war.

Well, Northwoods was concocted to result in a war. War with Cuba was the goal. If Northwoods had been carried out, we would have had war with Cuba that would would have resulted in the deaths of Americans. All based on a massive, unnecessary deception.

That's murder any way you slice it.

Are deaths in war murder?

Of course they are. Murder is murder. It doesn't matter if it's a lone serial killer or a nation of millions.

For a plan never done?

Good grief.

Why do you hate your government? Did you fail to vote?

Because it harbors the kind of psychopathic nitwits who would sit down and come up with a plan like Northwoods.

 

[NoahFence]

^^^

I drool more intelligence than that.

 

[pgimeno]

Well, Northwoods was concocted to result in a war. War with Cuba was the goal. If Northwoods had been carried out, we would have had war with Cuba that would would have resulted in the deaths of Americans. All based on a massive, unnecessary deception.

Translation: "I swallowed that Northwoods was the same idea as 9/11 but when I went to read and check by myself, I didn't find anything like that, and now I'm trying to cover my ass as well as I can with the best excuse I can come up with, lame as it is."

Face it, Northwoods did not include the death of U.S. people. The excuse you used to dismiss the OP is moot. Not to mention that the OP doesn't say it's impossible because the government wouldn't plan a false flag operation. It gives probabilistic reasons about how this one had to be carried out.

In particular, from the OP:

Is it possible to find a few much less dozens of people, presumably American, to wage war on their fellow unarmed citizens?

Is it possible that not one of these dozens of treasonous, murdering cowards would, over the course of the many months leading up to the attacks, not accidentally or on purpose divulge even some small detail to a drinking buddy? A wife or girlfriend? A mother or father?

Going to war is one thing. Killing fellow civilians on purpose in cold blood is quite different. I hope you can discern the difference between sending military personnel to war and murdering civilian people en masse.

At least I hope that this makes you think about just how gullible you have been swallowing the whole Northwoods-was-like-9/11 fiasco, and what else you can have been deceived with.

And I haven't taken the victory lap.

 

[beachnut]

Well, Northwoods was concocted to result in a war. ...

Because it harbors the kind of psychopathic nitwits who would sit down and come up with a plan like Northwoods.

You want to relate this to some 911 plan. Your 911 knowledge is limited, you offer zero substance, and make up lies about Northwoods, an operation never done. Most likely why 911 was not an inside job because all of 911 truth claims would be crazy idiots plans. If someone in the government made up such planes, the result, unemployment, not success.

You like fantasy, and your support, speculation.

You lied about Northwoods, it involved no deaths. Northwoods was not done, and no crazy government plans were responsible for 911. UBL was responsible, but you can't find his interviews. Is your google broke? You lie about the government; wait, can speculation be lies? Where did you say you got your speculation from?

 

[fess]

Uh, domestic false flag terror attacks involving civilian aircraft to scare the American people and justify foreign war.

How are they different?

And your proof of this is… Oh, I forgot, you don’t need proof to post stupidity.

 

[332nd]

Uh, domestic false flag terror attacks involving civilian aircraft to scare the American people and justify foreign war.

How are they different?

ON was kiss (keep it simple stupid). Also, no one was supposed to die. A 9/11 false flag would make a Bond villain wonder why it was so complicated.

 

[SpringHallConvert]

ON was kiss (keep it simple stupid).

9/11 was no less simple. Same kind of thing.

Also, no one was supposed to die.

Sure they were. Both were to result in wars in which people would die.

A 9/11 false flag would make a Bond villain wonder why it was so complicated.

Not really. What you believe happened wasn't that complicated, so for the U.S. government to covertly fund it, let it happen, and then cover it up would be a piece of cake.

Sorry.

 

[332nd]

9/11 was no less simple. Same kind of thing.

No, not at all.

Sure they were. Both were to result in wars in which people would die.

Wow.. you don't know the difference between an operation and a war?

Not really. What you believe happened wasn't that complicated, so for the U.S. government to covertly fund it, let it happen, and then cover it up would be a piece of cake.

Sorry.

Yeah like they covered up Watergate...
I mean Bill & Monica...
Oh! The savings & loan...

Hmmmm.... Nope! You're just wrong... again.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

It's irrelevant that Northwoods was rejected. What's important to note is that at the highest levels of our military leadership, there was a belief that they could pull off a massive deception against the American people to frame a foreign nation for war. If they didn't believe they could pull off this deception, they wouldn't have even bothered to plan it. The plan itself is proof that they believed it was possible.

Check and mate, pal.

There is so much wrong with the above, it's embarrassing.

Cue impotent bluster and taunting in 3..2..1..

 

[Regnad Kcin]

What you believe happened wasn't that complicated, so for the U.S. government to covertly fund it, let it happen, and then cover it up would be a piece of cake.

So covert and simple, yet somehow you uncovered the plot, right?

Why, if only everyone would consider all the damning evidence of the truth behind 9/11 provided by Wikileaks, right?

And if only we would listen to the perpetrators who were provided funds and support as they keep blowing the whistle on their US Govt masters, right?

 

[NoahFence]

This guy is a real piece of work, eh?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Boring, actually. I'm outta here.

 

[SpringHallConvert]

Boring, actually. I'm outta here.

Tuck that tail and run, why don't ya?

Before you let the proverbial door hit you on the ass on the way out, can you bother to explain why 9/11 couldn't possibly have been an inside job when high-ranking officials of our military leadership believed it to be possible to carry out a similar attack in 1962? After all, they wouldn't have written the plan down and submitted it up the chain of command if they didn't think it was possible.

Can you or any of your government truthbot automatons explain?