The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

Are you finally making a claim here? If you are, then what proof do you have that the government was complicit in the killing of almost 3,000 people and the destruction of billions of dollars in property?

What proof do you have that Al-Qaeda is a legitimate, independent, grassroots terrorist organization operating without State (U.S., specifically) assistance?
 
Yet not one individual has blown the whistle in over ten years… remarkable.

Why would they? So they can be mocked, ridiculed, marginalized, commit career suicide, have their family endangered? Ha, ha, ha...

As an aside, your obnoxious arrogant attitude does nothing for your credibility.

I am only a reflection of the behavior I have encountered here.

Now, back on topic. Several of your statements are far from being correct.

Prove it.

If one makes a statement of some wrong doing or whatever by an individual or group, then one should be able to make a statement that would lead us to believe that that statement is true. You have failed to do so in any of your posts.

Irrelevant. If the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks - which is almost a near certainty - then this would be true whether I prove it or not. Reality is what it is. It's not my responsibility to shape it for you, it's your responsibility to find it for yourself.
 
Last Tuesday's meeting of the general membership.

Prove it didn't happen.

Why can't you provide proof of Al-Qaeda's independence, legitimacy, and operational autonomy? I mean, that's a pretty important part of the whole government truth movement, isn't it? Because if Al-Qaeda did receive State sponsorship or support on 9/11, then what you guys believe about what occurred on that day would be radically different, no?

If you can't provide proof of Al-Qaeda's independence, legitimacy, and operation autonomy, then you must admit that your theory of 9/11 is based on mere speculation. That would mean you are no different than any of the conspiracy theorists you mock, right?

The truth is, I have you guys over a barrel here. You know it. I know it. Everyone reading here knows it. You won't admit it, but we both know the real score. You guys can't back any of your theories up, and it is driving you absolutely bonkers.
 
In other words, you don't really claim to know whether or not the U.S. government was involved in the attacks, you just believe and hope they weren't. I'm glad we got that ironed out.

Either way, the burden of proof is no more on me than it is on you. You believe without conclusive evidence that Al-Qaeda acted alone. I don't.

Is this what it's come down to? Is this all they have left?

Wow.
 
An interview with a couple of less-than credible crackpots doesn't prove anything. It certainly doesn't prove Al-Qaeda was working alone on 9/11, either.

How do you know they weren't misdirecting you and millions of other people away from the truth?

So now you are stating that al Jazeera is controlled by the US government?
 
What proof do you have that Al-Qaeda is a legitimate, independent, grassroots terrorist organization operating without State (U.S., specifically) assistance?

Answering a question with a question is a brilliant way to carry on a conversation. It is also childish at best.
 
Why would they? So they can be mocked, ridiculed, marginalized, commit career suicide, have their family endangered? Ha, ha, ha...

Ha ha ha, any proof of this? Of course not.


I am only a reflection of the behavior I have encountered here.
Why shouldn't we return the favor?


Prove it.

Why? You wouldn't believe it anyway

[/QUOTE]Irrelevant. If the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks - which is almost a near certainty - then this would be true whether I prove it or not. Reality is what it is. It's not my responsibility to shape it for you, it's your responsibility to find it for yourself. [/QUOTE]

If the US government was complicit? I thought you said they were. Reality in your case is the small world you live in.
 
Given the fact that SHC isn't answering any questions and is just JAQing off, I'd say he's a pretty inept troll. Let's just ignore the specimen. I'd give him about two weeks of active posting before he's banned.
 
Given the fact that SHC isn't answering any questions and is just JAQing off, I'd say he's a pretty inept troll. Let's just ignore the specimen. I'd give him about two weeks of active posting before he's banned.
Still hasn't made a claim either. :rolleyes:

However he is quite effective as a troll - look at the number of responses.
 
That's about the only thing that would save you guys from further embarrassment. Maybe you should send the mods a message begging for them to do the deed?

Life must have been cruel to you. Did you struggle at school? Where you bullied? Did you fail to achieve? Did McDonalds knock you back?

I guess you have spent your entire life blaming others for your own missfortune and believe that your country owes you something......for nothing. Angry young man and under achiever easily fooled by the stupid.

Get a life man....grow up. Your wasting away here. It's a big big world out there. Lots of things to do and see and not alot of time.
 
I find it fascinating that so many people seem to think that it would be so simple - almost automatic - to scramble armed fighters to shoot down American civilian airliners, full of civilians and possibly (to the knowledge of the AF/ANG) hijackers, on a chaotic day, when an hour before the threat level was not elevated. They seem to equate them with Bears inbound over the pole or something.

Fortunately such people aren't generally in charge of making life-and-death decisions - usually something more like what toppings to ask Mom to get on the pizza.
Yeah, I'm sure it's real complicated stuff. I'm sure military brass never imagined, planned, or drilled for such a scenario prior to September 11, 2001...

Ha, ha, ha... you government truthers will conjure up just about any excuse you can think of to deflect blame away from your beloved criminal government.
*Sigh* Case in point.

You think it's simple to react in a chaotic situation involving many unknowns and many organizations with different or partially-overlapping responsibilities.

You claim that the military was prepared to kill many civilians by shooting down civilian airliners, and you think that the national command structure was prepared to do such a thing. You have no evidence for such a claim - because any "evidence" you might cite is automatically disqualified according to your own demonstrated criteria.

You think "the government" is a monolithic entity.

You claim I "love" the government.

In other posts, you claim you don't know what happened, but clearly ("criminal", and other assertions in other posts) you are being disingenous.

There is nothing novel, informed, interesting, or particularly honest in your assertions. Fortunately, as I noted in my previous post, you are one of those people not charged with making life-and-death decisions. Go enjoy your reruns of Enemy of the State or V for Vendetta, and be bold - ask Mom for double pepperoni next time.

*Plonk*
 
Ha, ha, ha! The UN? Ha, ha, ha...

The U.S. government could evict the UN from U.S. territory, and then what? What's the UN going to do? Call some of their rapist peacekeepers to the scene?

And InterPol? Ha, ha! What authority or power do they have over the criminal U.S. government? None, that's what.
Wow, this truther/troll is doing a great job of convincing everyone that the "new investigation" he supposedly wants is actually impossible.

Just more proof of the "goal free" nature of 9/11 Truth.
 

Back
Top Bottom