The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

I've already stated that I don't know what happened. I believe the stuff we all saw on TV and in real life obviously happened (planes hijacked, flown into buildings, etc...), but I don't know who planned it all, who approved it, how it was funded, who the operatives were really representing, who they thought they were representing, if operatives might have been duped just as we were, what was the true goal, and many other factors. There's not enough evidence to conclude either way.

I suspect it was an inside job involving our own government and likely others.

Why is it so difficult to imagine, since you said you don't know, that someone else might know?

You don't know who planned it.
Others do.

However, you ignore them because you're a child who needs attention.
 
I've already stated that I don't know what happened. I believe the stuff we all saw on TV and in real life obviously happened (planes hijacked, flown into buildings, etc...), but I don't know who planned it all, who approved it, how it was funded, who the operatives were really representing, who they thought they were representing, if operatives might have been duped just as we were, what was the true goal, and many other factors. There's not enough evidence to conclude either way.

I suspect it was an inside job involving our own government and likely others.
Oh so you don't know then! Thanks for playing. But we DO know!
 
Last edited:
Now that's a good question. This represents a serious conundrum, doesn't it?

Tossing the whole 9/11 debate aside for a moment, what happens in a modern, supposedly democratic, sovereign society if and when the State commits a massive crime against the people it pretends to represent? Who has the power, resources, and authority to investigate such a crime other than the State itself, which maintains a total monopoly on the both the legal and justice systems?

Well, we don't have to imagine this scenario because this is the reality. This is the reality of America post-9/11.

Well, the UN for one.

And well, then there's InterPol.

Scotland Yard might be a good choice.

But yeah, the UN would investigate this type of attack, since it would be genocide.

But hey, you continue with your delusions, the rest of the world will continue to point and laugh at you.
 
Well, the UN for one.

And well, then there's InterPol.

Scotland Yard might be a good choice.

But yeah, the UN would investigate this type of attack, since it would be genocide.

But hey, you continue with your delusions, the rest of the world will continue to point and laugh at you.

Ha, ha, ha! The UN? Ha, ha, ha...

The U.S. government could evict the UN from U.S. territory, and then what? What's the UN going to do? Call some of their rapist peacekeepers to the scene?

And InterPol? Ha, ha! What authority or power do they have over the criminal U.S. government? None, that's what.

No wonder you buy into all these Al-Qaeda conspiracy theories. You'll believe anything you see on TV!

Ha, ha, ha!
 
Ha, ha, ha! The UN? Ha, ha, ha...

The U.S. government could evict the UN from U.S. territory, and then what? What's the UN going to do? Call some of their rapist peacekeepers to the scene?

And InterPol? Ha, ha! What authority or power do they have over the criminal U.S. government? None, that's what.

No wonder you buy into all these Al-Qaeda conspiracy theories. You'll believe anything you see on TV!

Ha, ha, ha!

InterPol was a joke. Not suprisingly, it went over your head.

And yes, the UN. Do you know what the UN does? Do you understand the power that the UN has?

If not, you need to finish 8th grade civics and world history before continuing to post.

BTW, we're all still just pointing out fingers and laughing at you.
 
SHC. Can you prove that evidence that AQ acted alone hasn't been presented?
 
Yep, just read the forum. You'll find nada. Zip. Zilch.

If I am wrong, prove it. Show me your smoking gun, Al-Qaeda did it all alone proof.

Good luck, troofer!

Say, we're in for some nice weather this week. I'm so glad spring training has restarted, they need to televise more of the games. Boy, Dave is always having Jack Hanna on, what's up with that.


Hey, what about that OP?
 
Last edited:
Yep, just read the forum. You'll find nada. Zip. Zilch.

If I am wrong, prove it. Show me your smoking gun, Al-Qaeda did it all alone proof.

Good luck, troofer!

Dude, if you're going to ignore me, please have the decency to tell me.
 
Our government has enormous financial and coercive resources at its disposal.

Yet not one individual has blown the whistle in over ten years… remarkable.

As an aside, your obnoxious arrogant attitude does nothing for your credibility.

Now, back on topic. Several of your statements are far from being correct. If one makes a statement of some wrong doing or whatever by an individual or group, then one should be able to make a statement that would lead us to believe that that statement is true. You have failed to do so in any of your posts.
 
Tossing the whole 9/11 debate aside for a moment, what happens in a modern, supposedly democratic, sovereign society if and when the State commits a massive crime against the people it pretends to represent? Who has the power, resources, and authority to investigate such a crime other than the State itself, which maintains a total monopoly on the both the legal and justice systems?

Well, we don't have to imagine this scenario because this is the reality. This is the reality of America post-9/11.

Are you finally making a claim here? If you are, then what proof do you have that the government was complicit in the killing of almost 3,000 people and the destruction of billions of dollars in property?
 
Yep, just read the forum. You'll find nada. Zip. Zilch.

If I am wrong, prove it. Show me your smoking gun, Al-Qaeda did it all alone proof.

Good luck, troofer!

Have you ever read al Jazeera or any other foreign news agency reports? You’ll find more than enough proof if you look for it. But we know you won’t.

“When star Al-Jazeera TV reporter Yosri Fouda received an anonymous call summoning him to a secret interview in Pakistan with al-Qaeda, he knew he could be walking into a deadly trap, as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl had done only months before. But he took the risk and hit pay dirt. For 48 hours, Fouda listened as two of the world's most wanted men, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, head of al-Qaeda's military committee, and Ramzi Binalshibh, the link between Mohammed Atta and the senior al-Qaeda leadership, proudly claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks on New York and the Pentagon – the first time al-Qaeda took direct responsibility. During the course of the in-depth interview, they detailed exactly how, over a two-year period, the plot was conceived, planned, and executed. Based on that interview and hours of follow-up investigation, MASTERMINDS OF TERROR also contains dramatic accounts of the subsequent seizure of both Binalshibh and Mohammed and analyzes al-Qaeda's attempts to justify its actions on what it calls 'Holy Tuesday.'”
 
Last edited:
Have you ever read al Jazeera or any other foreign news agency reports? You’ll find more than enough proof if you look for it. But we know you won’t.

An interview with a couple of less-than credible crackpots doesn't prove anything. It certainly doesn't prove Al-Qaeda was working alone on 9/11, either.

How do you know they weren't misdirecting you and millions of other people away from the truth?
 

Back
Top Bottom