If YOU are accusing the government of complicity, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.
So, where's your proof of that?
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.
So, where's your proof of that?
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.
So, where's your proof of that?
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/moussaouihome.html
Convicted.
Eta: damn your faster typing!
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.
So, where's your proof of that?
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.
So, where's your proof of that?
Go ahead, try this on topic OP stuff out. Tell us what you have.Is it possible that no emails, text messages, hard-drives, letters, receipts or other supporting communications evidence ever turn up?
Is it possible that the mastermind(s) of what would be the largest and most complex conspiracy in history not have at some point said, “Y’know, there’s way too much that can go wrong here. Why don’t we just plant some bombs on a few high-visibility targets, plant a couple bodies as evidence, and do some follow-up messages to the world’s media? It would take only a half-dozen guys, tops.”
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/moussaouihome.html
Convicted.
Eta: damn your faster typing!
Oh, it certainly could.Wake me up when someone proves that 9-11 couldn't have been an inside job.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/moussaouihome.html
Convicted.
Eta: damn your faster typing!
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.
Anybody got something? Bueller?
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.
Anybody got something? Bueller?
Well, then perhaps you could answer a question that I've been asking truthers for years but they refuse to answer? I assume you believe that WTC7 was brought down then by controlled demolition? If that's the case, then why did FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro set up (and admit to setting up the zone in later interviews) a collapse zone around the building, two hours prior to it's collapse?
Sorry, but a conviction in one of our state-run kangaroo courts doesn't necessarily mean 9/11 couldn't have been a U.S. government inside job.
Evidence points to the truth... that's what it does.
Who provided it. http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/someoftheagencies,organizationsandindivi
On internet sites, TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, scientific journals, etc...
You do realize that here you are pointing out that the same government that would have had to fool and/or intimidate thousands of firefighters, engineers, architects, law enforcement officers, pilots, crash scene investigators, etc.. both here & abroad...
Either forgot to or could figure out how to plant a few WMDs in areas they had full control over.
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.
Anybody got something? Bueller?