The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.

So, where's your proof of that?

LOL...

Links that are posted right here in the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories subsection of this very forum.

Archives of ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, HLN, Al-Jazeera, BBC, International News, Every local news affiliate across the country, the Federal Bureau of investigation, the CIA, local NYPD homicide and forensics detectives, fire and police, independent video, New York Dept of Tourism, victims family members web sites, firefighting victims, their families, police and their families, various independent web sites, the 9/11 Commission report, the NIST report, the report from FEMA, UL, and the various investigations made to the steel from the World Trade Center... the list goes on, dude! Do you want the whole list, or would you like to reference what I just listed here?
 
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.

So, where's your proof of that?

Well, then perhaps you could answer a question that I've been asking truthers for years but they refuse to answer? I assume you believe that WTC7 was brought down then by controlled demolition? If that's the case, then why did FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro set up (and admit to setting up the zone in later interviews) a collapse zone around the building, two hours prior to it's collapse?
 
Likewise, if YOU are accusing Al-Qaeda of acting alone, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.

So, where's your proof of that?

You said wake you up, were you asleep for 10 years?

19 terrorists did 911, they are dead. Did you miss it? Dead! How do you convict the dead people?


Is it possible that no emails, text messages, hard-drives, letters, receipts or other supporting communications evidence ever turn up?

Is it possible that the mastermind(s) of what would be the largest and most complex conspiracy in history not have at some point said, “Y’know, there’s way too much that can go wrong here. Why don’t we just plant some bombs on a few high-visibility targets, plant a couple bodies as evidence, and do some follow-up messages to the world’s media? It would take only a half-dozen guys, tops.”
Go ahead, try this on topic OP stuff out. Tell us what you have.
 
Last edited:


Both of you win.

moussaouicart7.jpg


Never saw that one. That's just beautiful. :)
 
Wake me up when someone proves that 9-11 couldn't have been an inside job.
Oh, it certainly could.

It's just, in ten years nobody has created a believable complete alternative version of what happened supported by evidence, all that I've been shown so far is a bunch of unconnected and self-contradicting speculation. Even "the best evidence" I've been shown is poor and does not prove any kind of inside job.

Maybe your case is different and you have a complete alternative version? Post it here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=185004
 
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.

Anybody got something? Bueller?
 
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.

Anybody got something? Bueller?

That's not what you asked for. Why are you moving the goal post like a frightened child?
 
Last edited:
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.

Anybody got something? Bueller?

You are off topic, why? Are you a troll. You failed to make a point past you have been asleep for over 10 years, you have no clue the terrorists are dead, and don't seem to know the thread topic.

Bueller is out having fun, you are in remedial 911 101, failed for 10 years. Flight 93 Passengers figured out 911 in minutes, 911 can't compose a logical question after 10 years. You are in the wrong thread.
 
Last edited:
Well, then perhaps you could answer a question that I've been asking truthers for years but they refuse to answer? I assume you believe that WTC7 was brought down then by controlled demolition? If that's the case, then why did FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro set up (and admit to setting up the zone in later interviews) a collapse zone around the building, two hours prior to it's collapse?

I'm afraid I don't see the point of your question. A fire department chief ordering the establishment of a collapse zone doesn't necessarily mean that foul play (controlled demolition) couldn't have been a factor.
 
Sorry, but a conviction in one of our state-run kangaroo courts doesn't necessarily mean 9/11 couldn't have been a U.S. government inside job.

I provided an AQ conviction on crimes committed on 9/11. Do you have a conviction of the USG on crimes commited on 9/11?
 
Hmmm... He seems to be missing the answers he asked for. Odd behavior for one who claims to listen to both sides.
Evidence points to the truth... that's what it does.



Who provided it. http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/someoftheagencies,organizationsandindivi

On internet sites, TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, scientific journals, etc...




You do realize that here you are pointing out that the same government that would have had to fool and/or intimidate thousands of firefighters, engineers, architects, law enforcement officers, pilots, crash scene investigators, etc.. both here & abroad...

Either forgot to or could figure out how to plant a few WMDs in areas they had full control over.
 
I see a lot of responses, but no proof that Al-Qaeda was acting independently and without state sponsorship on 9/11.

Anybody got something? Bueller?

Would the fact that bin Laden himself admitted complicity in the attack count for anything? I remember seeing a video years ago with bin Laden and some of his cohorts saying that they didn’t believe that the towers would collapse.
 

Back
Top Bottom