The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

Notice how he has YET to address my post from almost 10 pages ago?

Wow. And I though MM was bad at ignoring people.....sheez! This guy makes even RedIbis look like a regular poster!! HA!!
 
Is that like when you get a ticket from the local sheriff?

Let me guess, speeding? :D

Probably a local air sheriff with the theme song "I am the eye in the sky, looking at you, I can read your mind! I am the maker of rules, dealing with fools, I can steal you blind". :D
 
Tickets, security cameras.

I don't think their normal flight plans involved crashing into buildings.

All of which were killed in seconds by armed lunatics bursting into their cockpits. They spent most of the time, y'know, trying not to die. Unsuccessfully.

could a lunatic armed with a very short bladed knife, (the official story, not a gun) break through a locked door and murder someone in under 2 or 3 seconds.
1. Yes.
2. Question assumes that the door was locked.

because that is the time some pilots have said it would take them to set the squawk to 7500?
Unsourced assertion.

how many able bodied grown men do you think would be on an average 767 flight? you tell me.
Enough to break into the cockpit and down the plane near Shanksville.

So! Either the official story forgot to have the passengers all cowed in terror, or they remembered. Neither is good for the implied assertion from your rhetorical question.

could a lunatic armed with a short bladed knife even succeed in breaking through a locked door with these men throwing luggage from the overhead rack?
what

[/QUOTE]is it not possible one of the men would have the chance to grab his wrist and prevent him using the knife?[/QUOTE]Yes. But from their position, without training, not very. We are talking "being struck by lightning" numbers here.
 
why do you ask such a stupid question?
I was making the claim that not recieving the hijack code was proof the planes were not hijacked. therefore there must be an alternative explanation for the events of 9/11.
False. The attacks were specifically designed to kill the pilots in a few seconds in order to prevent them so much as radioing a mayday, much less inputting a code. If they had enough time to enter the code, then they had enough time to radio a mayday.

Truthers like to ignore that.
 
That would be the FBI that didn't find enough evidence to incriminate OBL?

MM
They didn't find enough to legally indict him, had plenty to incriminate him, and did not need to, because he was already wanted for terrorism. The fact that he was not actually charged for 9/11 is evidence that the FBI was working by the book, since it would be fairly easy to fabricate evidence, compared to, say, secretly planting experimental explosives in a complex of heavily-trafficked buildings in the middle of Manhattan over several months.
 
Many of us on this forum have the engineering training and practical experience to determine what happened quite independently of any government report so you can drop the strawman that we all just follow the government line.

He HAS to believe we are all just government shills, because what a huge blow to his world view it would be if he realized otherwise.
 
I am outta here and silver goes on my ignore list both for failing to defend his own story and for being too dumb to use QUOTE tags correctly.

silver birch, you're causing other quotes to be mis-attributed because people are quoting you, but you have an open quote tag in your recent posts. Please make sure that there is a close quote at the end of the text you are quoting. That's
PHP:
[/quote]

And would you please consider capitalization to start your sentences, like the adults do? We're not txting here.
 
Last edited:
Here is my source for the time taken for pilots to squawk 7500-
The new pearl harbour revisited by David Ray Griffin, page 176-
The fact that neither pilots of flight 11 squawked this code constitutes a big problem for the official story. We can see this more clearly by looking at CNN's treatment of this issue the same day, which said,
Flight 11 was hijacked apparently by knife-welding men. Airline pilots are trained to handle such situations by keeping calm, complying with requests, and if possible, dialling in an emergency 4 digit code on a device called a transponder. It transmits crucial flight data to air traffic controllers. The actions takes seconds, but it appears no such code was entered.
A problem with this statement is that the word ''dialling'' suggests that the operation would be like dialling a telephone, which might take several seconds. However, the transponder has 4 knobs. The pilot, or co-pilot simply rotates the knobs until the transponder reads 7500. this action, PILOTS HAVE TOLD ME, TAKES ONLY 2 OR 3 SECONDS.
In any case, the crucial issue was indicated in the CNN story, by the phrase ''if possible''. Would it have been possible for the pilots of flight 11 to have performed this action? Right after the above quoted comment CNN said,
But in the cabin a frantic flight attendant managed to use a phone to call American Airlines Command Centre in Dallas. She reported the trouble. And, according to the Christian Science Monitor, a pilot apparently keyed the microphone, transmitting a telephone conversation.
If there was time for both of those actions to be taken, there would have been more than enough time for one of the pilots to squawk the 4 digit hijack code.
 
3 seconds, when your throat is slashed, is an eternity.

Sorry about your failure.

BTW, there were no requests. It was:

Open door.

Enter cockpit

Kill pilot.

Do you see a problem with this?
 
Here is my source for the time taken for pilots to squawk 7500-
The new pearl harbour revisited by David Ray Griffin, page 176-
The fact that neither pilots of flight 11 squawked this code constitutes a big problem for the official story. We can see this more clearly by looking at CNN's treatment of this issue the same day, which said,
Flight 11 was hijacked apparently by knife-welding men. Airline pilots are trained to handle such situations by keeping calm, complying with requests, and if possible, dialling in an emergency 4 digit code on a device called a transponder. It transmits crucial flight data to air traffic controllers. The actions takes seconds, but it appears no such code was entered.
A problem with this statement is that the word ''dialling'' suggests that the operation would be like dialling a telephone, which might take several seconds. However, the transponder has 4 knobs. The pilot, or co-pilot simply rotates the knobs until the transponder reads 7500. this action, PILOTS HAVE TOLD ME, TAKES ONLY 2 OR 3 SECONDS.
In any case, the crucial issue was indicated in the CNN story, by the phrase ''if possible''. Would it have been possible for the pilots of flight 11 to have performed this action? Right after the above quoted comment CNN said,
But in the cabin a frantic flight attendant managed to use a phone to call American Airlines Command Centre in Dallas. She reported the trouble. And, according to the Christian Science Monitor, a pilot apparently keyed the microphone, transmitting a telephone conversation.
If there was time for both of those actions to be taken, there would have been more than enough time for one of the pilots to squawk the 4 digit hijack code.

How much simpler would it be for the pilot to transmit (over radio) that he was under attack ?
But, because of the sudden attack and their deaths, that was not possible.
Remember, pilots are strapped in and facing forward, their concentration is on flying and not on some mad muslim creeping up on them
 
More boring anomaly hunting and incredulity. Silver birch, face it -- you really just don't know how much of the world works. That you feel qualified to opine on these fields based on your reading of a book written by a conspiracy-monger theologian is simply of no consequence. You will never, ever have any impact in the real world. Sorry, but that is the reality.


PS - thank you for the capitalization. It helps with readabiliy. If you feel adventurous, try tackling paragraphs next.
 
How much simpler would it be for the pilot to transmit (over radio) that he was under attack ?
But, because of the sudden attack and their deaths, that was not possible.
Remember, pilots are strapped in and facing forward, their concentration is on flying and not on some mad muslim creeping up on them

the muslim hijackers cannot all be mad, because 6 of them have now got good jobs in saudi.
 
the muslim hijackers cannot all be mad, because 6 of them have now got good jobs in saudi.

So, what you're saying is that each name is unique for the ENTIRE universe?!?!?!? STFU!?!?!?!?!?!? Are you kidding me?

Hint: There are 2 of me, with my same exact name, same spelling, in the state of FLORIDA.

That, is foolish to assume.......foolish.
 
the muslim hijackers cannot all be mad, because 6 of them have now got good jobs in saudi.

Feel free to provide evidence to support your fantasy. To save time, please tell us you do understand the majority of Muslim males are named "Muhammad" or some variation on that spelling.

Prediction: you will link to the same ten year debunked two articles mistakenly identifying people with similar names.
 
the muslim hijackers cannot all be mad, because 6 of them have now got good jobs in saudi.


Many people may be uninformed about structural engineering and airliner operations, but hardly anyone can fail to understand that individuals' names are often not unique. You should stick with claims that actually have a chance of fooling the gullible whom you're trying to convert.
 
Many people may be uninformed about structural engineering and airliner operations, but hardly anyone can fail to understand that individuals' names are often not unique. You should stick with claims that actually have a chance of fooling the gullible whom you're trying to convert.

Three people with the exact same name as my wife entered the country in December of 1982 through SeaTac Airport. She got the wrong Social Security number. Twice.

There are probably several times as many men named Muhammed Ali than there are women named Yong Suk.
 
Three people with the exact same name as my wife entered the country in December of 1982 through SeaTac Airport. She got the wrong Social Security number. Twice.

There are probably several times as many men named Muhammed Ali than there are women named Yong Suk.

I imagine Suk is like "Smith" in her home country. As is "Muhammad" like John in others. Not to mention (like Asian names), many Arabic names are transliterated multiple ways into English and Roman script.

Muhammad, Mohammad, Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohammed, Mohamad, Muhammad, Muhammed, Muhamed, Muhammed, Muhamed, Muhammet, or Muhamet.
 

Back
Top Bottom