The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

bynmdsue said:
Andrew Card is not a "secret service man". Are you lying or simply mistaken? Either way you're wrong.
Click to expand...

instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
 
silver birch said:
2 more posts to keep you going
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q8tA2iqaXo&feature=relmfu
Click to expand...

What the hell qualifies a failed ecconomist like Reynolds to address TV fakery? What qualifies him to tell me, a veteran miklitary fire fighter what sort of wreckage I am supposed to see when an aircraft rams a steel tower? The senile old fart has no freaking clue.

This is a yutz who thinks piddle-down ecconomics works, for crying out loud.

He's nuts.
 
silver birch said:
instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
Click to expand...

Yes, people do have opinions. What are you trying to prove? Got a thesis, some new evidence?
 
silver birch said:
after the second hit, a secret service man tells him- america is under attack. what does the commander in chief do,
he sits there for 18 minutes reading a story about a goat, WITH A LOOK ON HIS FACE LIKE THE CAT WHO STOLE THE CREAM AND GOT AWAY WITH IT, is the best way I can describe it, he is in on the inside job, with the rest of the neocons and zionists.
Click to expand...

Never understood this stupid argument.

For this to be true, it would mean Bush and his co-conspirators would have had to have INTENTIONALLY or though EXTREME INCOMPETENCE decided to act as if they were guilty.

Why would they do that?

And why is it only you truthers notice this?
 
silver birch said:
instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
Click to expand...

Why? You've already shown that you ignore evidence. The second people point out the flaws in your argument, you immediately start moving goalposts while stomping your feet like an 8 year old girl.
You didn't like being called a liar, but you are one. You set yourself up with that Lt. comment and claims to your "service". You never were a member of any armed force.
You're another troll rolling through the forum that will disappear just like all the rest. Welcome to ignore.
 
silver birch said:
instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
Click to expand...

The real issue is: You claimed that there are FDNY fire chiefs who do not believe the official story (that damage and fires inflicted by 19 terrorists flying 4 planes into 3 buildings caused all the death and damage of 9/11), and when asked for evidence, linked to the homepage of FF911T with a text by non-witness former-FDNY non-chief Anton Vodvarka, that contains a large number of lies, as you have been shown.

You have yet to either support your initial claim with better evidence, or retract it, or revise it and then present evidence that supports a revised claim. Running away is not an option, unless you want to leave behind the impression that you are not interested in a rational debate aimed at finding the facts at hand.
 
Last edited:
silver birch said:
instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
Click to expand...

Not nit-picking, your ability to do rational research is exposed by your ignorance on all aspects of 911.
You have no REAL issues.
Bush? What was Bush suppose to do? What did you do? Unless you were on Flight 93, there is not much anyone could do on 911 but watch. Flight 11, 175, and 77 passengers suspected they were hijacked, so that did nothing, not knowing it was murder, not hijacking.

Now you come along,
silver birch said:
... bush. shortly after 9/11 in a press conference he stated- ''I watched the plane hit the tower live on tv at the school'', a lie.
...
Click to expand...
I watched TV on 911 saw where the first plane hit. You take Bush, and quote mine your way to calling him a liar. Good for you, Bush leaves out "where", you add lie. Wow, you are a super researcher who falls for delusional, moronic claims and fail to realize they are old, failed nonsense. Bush is not very good at speaking, and you use that as fodder for your idiotic claims which don't make sense in the first place. You take Bush saying he say the first impact on TV, and do what? Impossible. Call him a liar. How do you make the leap to inside job? lol, failing to realize Bush left out "where".

DRG is nothing. If his book was true, he would have a Pulitzer Prize. Where is it. You take DRG claims and fail out of the box. You could not find a bigger dolt on 911 issue than DRG. If he is not a moron, then he writes for morons who like delusions.

I watched live TV on 911 and saw "where" flight 11 hit the WTC. YOU are the nit-picker, using Bush quotes is nit-picking. Good job too.
 
Last edited:
silver birch said:
www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=g3cpHxbIIV4
Click to expand...

Actually, the second video linked in that post disproves the crap that old man Reynolds was trying to sell.

If it was not an airliner that struck the first tower, it would have to have been a missile or a very large demolition charge plqaced on the outside of the building.

The witness does not describe it as an especially loud explosion. It just does not work favorably for Da Twoof.
 
silver birch said:
instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
Click to expand...

Because your "real issues" are built on a foundation of lies and mistakes and carelessness. Your 9/11 Was An Inside Job Idol has feet of clay.

There are commentators who believe President Obama should be impeached for his recess appointments. Somebody always wants to impeach somebody else, that doesn't mean they are all valid.
 
silver birch said:
instead of nit-picking, like the replies pointing out my ignorance of FDNY ranks, (which has been done to death by now) why not address the real issues which is your way of avoiding them?
there are commentators who believe bush should have been impeached for his response on that day.
Click to expand...

And they would be wrong for thinking that. I mean Bush could have just ordered loads of jet liners shot out of the air but history would probably have come down pretty hard on him for it. He could have also ordered a nuclear strike on Uganda just for giggles.

In short I would just love to hear their case for this.
 
Alt. History time...Andy Card whispers into the President's ear that America is under attack. G-Dub leaps to his feet and shouts "Not on my watch!" and charges from the room to...what? What could possibly have gone any differently? Ordered the planes out of the air sooner? Somehow I don't think suicide hijackers are going to obey that.
 
That's what people miss that think he shouldn't have just sat there for a few minutes. If he had just charged out of the room he would have simply been kept in the adjoining room knowing absolutely nothing more and not being able to do anything either.
 
Yea, but if only he would have ducked into a phone booth, ripped off his clothes to expose his red, white, and blue leotards with the big S on the front and flown off to intercept flight 93.

That would have been SO cool
 
bynmdsue said:
Alt. History time...Andy Card whispers into the President's ear that America is under attack. G-Dub leaps to his feet and shouts "Not on my watch!" and charges from the room to...what? What could possibly have gone any differently? Ordered the planes out of the air sooner? Somehow I don't think suicide hijackers are going to obey that.
Click to expand...
what suicide hijackers? there is no evidence the planes were hijacked.
I will not mention the phone calls again.
 
bynmdsue said:
Alt. History time...Andy Card whispers into the President's ear that America is under attack. G-Dub leaps to his feet and shouts "Not on my watch!" and charges from the room to...what? What could possibly have gone any differently? Ordered the planes out of the air sooner? Somehow I don't think suicide hijackers are going to obey that.
Click to expand...

I assume you include the 6 suicide hijackers who have now got good jobs in saudi.
 
bynmdsue said:
Because your "real issues" are built on a foundation of lies and mistakes and carelessness. Your 9/11 Was An Inside Job Idol has feet of clay.

There are commentators who believe President Obama should be impeached for his recess appointments. Somebody always wants to impeach somebody else, that doesn't mean they are all valid.
Click to expand...

President Obama is doing what the fed tells him, the same as every president ever since JFK had his head blown off for not doing so.
when is he going to close down guantanamo- his election pledge?
 
silver birch said:
I assume you include the 6 suicide hijackers who have now got good jobs in saudi.
Click to expand...

Gish Galloping. The still alive hijacker meme that has been disproven repeatedly. I thought they were in Morocco and Kevin Barrett was going to find them.
 
tempesta29 said:
The Wikipedia link was for the obvious laymen on the subject, but thanks for turning it into an attack on me. Don't worry: I've gotten used to that topic. If you think, after watching hypnotists on daytime television convince a man in an armchair he's driving a Ferrari, that the CIA can't do more or less the same, then there's not much more to discuss: you need to learn more about the subject.
Click to expand...

You think those hypnotist acts on daytime TV are real?


Figures.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom