Sabretooth
No Ordinary Rabbit
So you admit it's a possibility. Thanks for playing.
/thread
Holy crap, this is awesome. I haven't seen someone bury their head this far into the sand since Jammy!
So you admit it's a possibility. Thanks for playing.
/thread
There's no evidence to support the idea that any amount of external manipulation can turn someone into an unthinking automaton who has no memory of his actions.
I'll just give you the money quote from post #4 in the thread:Can you please give me a brief summary of the arguments in this thread. Thank you.
In summary, the exercises occurring on September 11 that involved NORAD were “Vigilant Guardian” and “Global Guardian”. According to Myers, these exercise increased the speed with which NORAD responded to the attacks:
These are command post exercises; what that means is that all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled; so it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real world situation. It actually enhanced the response; otherwise, it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions, those battle stations, with the right staff officers.
Why, Are you in a hurry to find the facts (truth)?Can you please give me a brief summary of the arguments in this thread. Thank you.
How many "simulations" actually took place?
Why, Are you in a hurry to find the facts (truth)?
I plead the fifth.You never got high, did you?
You're the one who brought up war games. I was directing you to a thread that covered the topic.Please stick to this thread and avoid giving me "read this" arguments thank you.
But to answer your question, yes I am presently time-constrained.
...If you think, after watching hypnotists on daytime television convince a man in an armchair he's driving a Ferrari, that the CIA can't do more or less the same, then there's not much more to discuss: you need to learn more about the subject.
They are all cheap literary devices. Shortcuts that bad writers use in conspiracy fiction."mind control" is just another one of those buzz phrases like "nano thermite" or "holographic projections" or "voice morphing technology", etc, that is merely a desperate attempt to explain an untenable theory.
I'll just give you the money quote from post #4 in the thread:
For example, it is reported that there was a war simulation of hijacked aircrafts going on. To this end there were "phantom" planes flying around on the radar. This could have been used to confuse any appropriate response to the attack if we had reports of dozens of hijacked aircraft instead of the four which occured on 9/11. The technicians and administrators of the simulations would be unwitting accomplices.
No, I'm not dying to tell you what I know. I spent the time and did the research. Your laziness is not my problem.You tell me, I have a feeling you are just dying to inform me about what you know.
twinstead said:"mind control" is just another one of those buzz phrases like "nano thermite" or "holographic projections" or "voice morphing technology", etc, that is merely a desperate attempt to explain an untenable theory.
They are all cheap literary devices. Shortcuts that bad writers use in conspiracy fiction.
Huh?This argument does not seem to debunk the possibility that war simulations may have been a means to carry out the attcks, but only strenghtens it.
If they were actually in the air and even practicing in the area, which I have never heard any evidence of, they would likely have been squawking IDs that would clearly indicate they were military. All of the planes that were actually hijacked or were thought to be hijacked were either not squawking or were squawking specific hijacked codes and they were also all accounted for as known commercial craft not military test flights.
Huh?
Exercises = active crews that could quickly be redirected
No exercises = inactive crews that would have taken longer to get airborne
The confusion about whether the attacks were real took mere moments to clear up.
The response to the hijackings was arguably slow and unusual, not quick and regular.
The cheap (propaganda) device is to mix different ideas and concepts together under one label when they each vary sharply in their nature and quality.