Greatest I am
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 2,124
Wrong. With no knowledge of good and evil there is no limit to what we can discuss or do.
An example or two would be nice to prove your point.
Regards
DL
Wrong. With no knowledge of good and evil there is no limit to what we can discuss or do.
Without the knowledge of good and evil, you would not know what to put on your list or that you even had to make one.
Thanks for proving my point.
Regards
DL
Please define this word "good" and that other one, "evil." Then, show how that are inextricably linked to all issues and without understanding them, nothing can learned, because I've seen quite a few babies learn to walk and speak without knowing good or evil.
It [sex] just happens to have both aspects. Sometimes good and sometimes better and sometimes bad.
The dictionary definition will do.
As to walking. For a baby to walk is good. For a baby that should walk and does not is bad or evil.
Regards
DL
Greatest I am, I am perplexed that you think my list enforces your belief.
Certainly there were some lessons learned from each event, however, if you wish to prove that evil is something useful in terms of growth, you need to show where we would be without it, and how our world would be less knowledgeable or understanding.
I don't see that, I see many mistakes that could have been avoided, and better choices that could have been made. In that sense, your "evil" cheapened our learning experience and directly got in the way of our best growth.
I agree with "good" and "better", but "bad"?! You'll have to PM me some "bad sex" stories. I've never heard of such a thing.![]()
I agree with "good" and "better", but "bad"?! You'll have to PM me some "bad sex" stories. I've never heard of such a thing.![]()
Which dictionary, which definition? There are numerous, irreconcilable, definitions of good and to prevent you from equivocating wildly, I'd like it if you defined the terms for the purposes of this disucussion.
I would think not unless that knowledge produces a new movie and brings you millions.Is the knowledge gained from "evil" necessary to optimum growth? If so, how?
GIA wrote
Evil as a noun does not stand well alone.
I would think that knowledge of what not to do would be necessary for any growth.
Is the "evil" choices ever better in the long run for humanity? If so, how?
Good is desirable.
Evil is not.
If good is wat is desireable, and evil is what is not, than your earlier statement, that without knowledge of good and evil, there would only be instinct, is false. Insctintive responses in animals focus on what is desireable, survival, mates, resources, and avoiding what is not, pain, hunger, discomfort.
I understand your point but the animal in question does not.
If it understood good and evil it would know why it does what it does.
As far as we know at this point in time, it does not. Instincts guide, they do not know that they are doing it.
This would not be a good thing for man and is likely why we are the superior species.
Regards
DL
"The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters. "
I would think not unless that knowledge produces a new movie and brings you millions.
Good is desirable.
Evil is not.
I understand your point but the animal in question does not.
If it understood good and evil it would know why it does what it does.
God then needs evil to accomplish His plan for man.
So you maintain that we know the difference between good and evil, because we know "what is desirable?" How would you characterize Ghengis Khan's fondest desire?
In any conflict situation it is good to be the winner.
It is evil to be the looser.
The Khan was a barbarian and a great man in his day. Today we profess to be more civilized. Please do not ask for a definition of that word.
Regards
DL
The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters.