angrysoba
Philosophile
No, he's not:
It's just that the people that would end up being killed by this criterion would be disproportionately poor and disproportionately black. He also says second or third strike somewhere inn a later post. I don't think any of that is too radical, although I'm not sure the extent to which I agree. Probably more than most here.
There is a reason for the overlap between poverty, violent crime, and being black. Skeptic Tanks "proposal" would take care of all three things at once, at the expense of millions of human lives. Are you really comfortable advocating for mass executions?
I want to point this out so that people are not confused and don't start engaging in some arcane hermeneutical examination of the writings of Skeptic Tank.
Skeptic Tank is an avowed racist who wants a white ethno-state. He has stated it as clearly as it is possible to do so in the past.
I don't mean, if you read between the lines, I mean actually baldly stated the fact that he is a racist who does not want ethnic mixing thank you very much.