• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Terror attack in Wisconsin

No, he's not:



It's just that the people that would end up being killed by this criterion would be disproportionately poor and disproportionately black. He also says second or third strike somewhere inn a later post. I don't think any of that is too radical, although I'm not sure the extent to which I agree. Probably more than most here.

There is a reason for the overlap between poverty, violent crime, and being black. Skeptic Tanks "proposal" would take care of all three things at once, at the expense of millions of human lives. Are you really comfortable advocating for mass executions?

I want to point this out so that people are not confused and don't start engaging in some arcane hermeneutical examination of the writings of Skeptic Tank.

Skeptic Tank is an avowed racist who wants a white ethno-state. He has stated it as clearly as it is possible to do so in the past.

I don't mean, if you read between the lines, I mean actually baldly stated the fact that he is a racist who does not want ethnic mixing thank you very much.
 
I want to point this out so that people are not confused and don't start engaging in some arcane hermeneutical examination of the writings of Skeptic Tank.

Skeptic Tank is an avowed racist who wants a white ethno-state. He has stated it as clearly as it is possible to do so in the past.

I don't mean, if you read between the lines, I mean actually baldly stated the fact that he is a racist who does not want ethnic mixing thank you very much.

Exactly, Skeptic Tank is a proud racist who proudly admits to being racist.

No beating about the bush, he is completely open about it.
 
The perp here looks awfully light. Where I grew up, we'd take him for a Basque sheepherder or a Greek or some such. If he hates whites, he hates a (pretty large) part of himself.

Nothing unusual in seif-hate, of course, and not just among Mischlings. But our resident racies, open and thinly veiled, must consider that this joker inherits a helluva lot of Whight Manner genes and the traits that supposedly go with them. Traits that our racialists must surely share!

Could those traits include criminality, violence, and a yearning for genocide? "The Aryan hates his enemy and wishes to kill him." Who said that? Some advanced philosopher, I suppose.
 
The latest news I see is that it's now alleged he was not fleeing from police, but had just left a domestic disturbance, so why he was where he was and why he started running people down becomes more mysterious again. Then again, he seems such an overall nasty character that I suspect most of us will never understand him.
 
Sign of the times that these days when there is an atrocity, there is an anxious wait to discover (a) the ethnicity of the victim/s and that of (b) the perpetrator/s, as if knowing makes a difference to how one should react. I've noticed people on Twitter sighing a collective breath of relief when the perp is NOT a Muslim (I presume they are) and then a lot of stuff about how the perp/s are 'Somalian' or, 'the police aren't revealing his ID, and that is...SUSPICIOUS! That can only mean...it's a...[insert scary bogeyman here]'

Does it make a difference if the perp is of one ethnicity or another?
 
Sign of the times that these days when there is an atrocity, there is an anxious wait to discover (a) the ethnicity of the victim/s and that of (b) the perpetrator/s, as if knowing makes a difference to how one should react. I've noticed people on Twitter sighing a collective breath of relief when the perp is NOT a Muslim (I presume they are) and then a lot of stuff about how the perp/s are 'Somalian' or, 'the police aren't revealing his ID, and that is...SUSPICIOUS! That can only mean...it's a...[insert scary bogeyman here]'

Does it make a difference if the perp is of one ethnicity or another?

Sometimes it might, depending on the nature of the crime. It can certainly make a difference in how the media reports it.
 
The latest news I see is that it's now alleged he was not fleeing from police, but had just left a domestic disturbance, so why he was where he was and why he started running people down becomes more mysterious again. Then again, he seems such an overall nasty character that I suspect most of us will never understand him.

If he left a domestic disturbance and decided to take that route without knowing of the parade, being hailed by a cop and shot at might well have caused a panic reaction to just get away.
 
If he left a domestic disturbance and decided to take that route without knowing of the parade, being hailed by a cop and shot at might well have caused a panic reaction to just get away.

Well, to be fair the barricade should have been a pretty good indicator that something was going on in front of him. Judging by his criminal past he seems like the type of person to lash out before taking off.
 
If he left a domestic disturbance and decided to take that route without knowing of the parade, being hailed by a cop and shot at might well have caused a panic reaction to just get away.

Poor guy. Probably was a white cop, too. Damn pigs.
 
Sign of the times that these days when there is an atrocity, there is an anxious wait to discover (a) the ethnicity of the victim/s and that of (b) the perpetrator/s, as if knowing makes a difference to how one should react. I've noticed people on Twitter sighing a collective breath of relief when the perp is NOT a Muslim (I presume they are) and then a lot of stuff about how the perp/s are 'Somalian' or, 'the police aren't revealing his ID, and that is...SUSPICIOUS! That can only mean...it's a...[insert scary bogeyman here]'

Does it make a difference if the perp is of one ethnicity or another?

No, but it definitely makes a difference on how people react to the crime, and it certainly can change the context the crime takes place in. Naturally, politics is going to figure in.
 
If he left a domestic disturbance and decided to take that route without knowing of the parade, being hailed by a cop and shot at might well have caused a panic reaction to just get away.

Is there any evidence this happened? Considering he previously tried to kill someone with a car, this would be quite a coincidence.
 
So, just to check, running over people marching the street is again a BAD thing, right? Because we had people advocating that it should be legal for a while.
 
6 dead now. This latest one is reportedly a child.
They will add one additional charge of intentional homicide.
 
Sign of the times that these days when there is an atrocity, there is an anxious wait to discover (a) the ethnicity of the victim/s and that of (b) the perpetrator/s, as if knowing makes a difference to how one should react. I've noticed people on Twitter sighing a collective breath of relief when the perp is NOT a Muslim (I presume they are) and then a lot of stuff about how the perp/s are 'Somalian' or, 'the police aren't revealing his ID, and that is...SUSPICIOUS! That can only mean...it's a...[insert scary bogeyman here]'

Does it make a difference if the perp is of one ethnicity or another?

There are important lessons to be learned if the perp is a cisgender straight white male.
 

Back
Top Bottom