Teh 28th Annual Stundie Finals for November: Appropriately Late

November Stundie Finalists: Who deserves to win?

  • #1: Moon landing massacre

    Votes: 14 9.3%
  • #2: The Nazi's Nuclear Bomb

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • #3: Irony is a self-referential nom'

    Votes: 9 6.0%
  • #4: The fireball experiment

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • #5: Secret Controlled Demolitions

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • #6: Viva La Hive Mind!

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • #7: The ultra-polite CTer

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • #8: Mixing up the burden of proof lets me insert a Shins reference

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • #9: Clunkety-Clunk rebuttal

    Votes: 17 11.3%
  • #10: Gravity does not exist

    Votes: 7 4.6%
  • #11: Post hoc ergo propter hoc

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • #12: The 30 story suspended building

    Votes: 4 2.6%
  • #13: The George Bush twins and the Puppet Master

    Votes: 17 11.3%
  • #14: Speed & Mass = Velocity

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • #15: France, Poland, what's the difference?

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • #16: The Air Force pilot who wasn't

    Votes: 5 3.3%
  • #17: The NWO exists beyond the five senses

    Votes: 9 6.0%
  • #18: Hitler was an Allied shill

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #19: 100% lies = Pure Twooth

    Votes: 41 27.2%
  • #20: Pearl Harbour and the Vietnam Conspiracy

    Votes: 9 6.0%

  • Total voters
    151
  • Poll closed .
As a long-time posting award dictator, allow me to make one small suggestion, Moby. When creating the initial post, go to the post, click the quote button and copy/paste it into your new thread (editing as necessary). That allows the little arrow that links you to the nominated post. Also, include the nominee names in the poll. These people deserve recognition!
 
It's been a few months since I last cast a vote in the stundie awards, but boy oh boy what a collection this month offered up.

It had to be 19.

It is not often one laughs out loud at a computer screen, but this was one of those occasions.
 
For sure it was a tough one to decide. In the end I gave a nod to #10 (gravity does not exist), because I find it almost inconceivable someone can be that clueless. Close follow-ups were #1 (the great moon landing massacre) and #9 (the clunkity-clunk rebuttal).
 
I voted for No3, because Unsecured Coins doesn't have to take a hostage.
 
As a long-time posting award dictator, allow me to make one small suggestion, Moby. When creating the initial post, go to the post, click the quote button and copy/paste it into your new thread (editing as necessary). That allows the little arrow that links you to the nominated post. Also, include the nominee names in the poll. These people deserve recognition!

Good suggestiong, but actually ones that I've already either thought of or tested.

Clicking the quote button would work for posts from the JREF forums, but the majority of nominations and finalists do not come from the JREF forums. I could include links, but CT forums have a habit of deleting posts or indeed entire threads, and the link may be dead, meaning that the only evidence of the nomination is a screenshot (noms with no screenshot or link are immediately discarded). In other words, it's either track down the specific reference for each individual nom, or leave all the references in the nominations thread. To avoid a disproportionalte amount of work, I choose the latter.

As for posting the names of the nominees - last month I decided to experiment with making the finalists anonymous. The reason for this is that I don't want people to vote for a person, I want them to vote for what was actually said. I want people to look and say, "Hey, #25 is really bizarre and funny, I'm going to vote for that one," rather than saying, "Hey, that Dylan Avery is stupid, I'm going to vote for him."

Once the voting closes I do reveal the winner's identity and present him, her or it with the award.

Thanks for the suggestions though! :)
 
Oh, my mistake. I thought all this stuff had been said somewhere here. I guess I don't get around the CT threads enough. Anyway, I had to put in a lone vote for the Hive Mind. I've always had a fascination with the Borg.
 
Oh, my mistake. I thought all this stuff had been said somewhere here. I guess I don't get around the CT threads enough. Anyway, I had to put in a lone vote for the Hive Mind. I've always had a fascination with the Borg.

No problem. Welcome to the funny part of the dungeon.
 
Some excellent choices this month, indeed.

So, I pondered.

Then I pondered some more.

Then I pondered further.

Finally, I said to myself, "That's enough pondering, vote already!"

So, I did.

For #19: even if something is comprised 100% of lies, it's still "truth" to the idiots in the 9/11 Truth™ Movement.
 
In case anyone is interested in a newbie's opinion, 19 belongs in the hall of fame. I could not even get that statement past my 8 year old son.
 
Welcome to the forum, GStan. And by the way, your post made me literally burst out laughing.
 
Came close to going with #19, but I can sort of - almost - see what they're trying to get at, however stupid the sentiment. I said "almost", OK? So in the end I stuck with good old "clunkety clunk". Can't go wrong.
 
Last edited:
#7 - The most polite truther on the webs!

while i appreciate ur offer to be debunked, I'm content at the moment to believe that what happened on 9/11 was an inside job.


Turn me back into the pet that I was when we met,
I was happier then with no mind set.
 
I voted #13, it's just so completely insane that someone could even make that stuff up, let alone on top of that think it was true.

This has got to be the hardest vote I've done in these though, they were all so equally crazy.
 
Once again a hard choice, but it had to be 19 for me. That one is just astoundingly beautiful.

-Gumboot
 
#19 reminds me of Yossarian's description of Catch-22:

"There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle."
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom