Teabagger Whacktard Christine O’Donnell Warns Against Mice With Human Brains!

[funk de fino]

Yes, I agree.

O'Donnell won because she promoted fiscal insanity - that the government not spend trillions of money that it does not have. Indeed this is insane. Any rational person knows we can borrow from our children and their child without asking their permission.

Those dumb Republicans. Are they trying to stop the party? It was just getting fun. Go ahead, Ben, and grab some of that Obama-money. You can have some. You too can be in on the good times.

She is still a nut who said a very stupid (and false) thing that you tried to defend with all your gusto. It doesn't get any funnier.

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

{snip}It was noted in the show immediately after she made that comment, that it was an exaggeration. {snip}

A. Soros funded TPM cranks up the smears after O'Donnell is elected...

That is an exaggeration.

 

[mhaze]

She is still a nut who said a very stupid (and false) thing that you tried to defend with all your gusto. It doesn't get any funnier.

Suit yourself. I'm sure that because man-mouse eg chimera products are so funny, you won't want the results of that research when you need to grow a new spinal cord.

 

[brodski]

Yes, I expect it will become a word because ignorance seems to be a defining trait of our evolving society.

Firstly, it is already a word, secondly most criticism of it is based on the most staggering ignorance of the words history and the history and nature of the English language.

 

[BenBurch]

Firstly, it is already a word, secondly most criticism of it is based on the most staggering ignorance of the words history and the history and nature of the English language.

My dictionary says "nonstandard."

Meaning that it's in use, and totally wrong.

It also says;

Definition of NONSTANDARD

1 : not standard

2 : not conforming in pronunciation, grammatical construction, idiom, or word choice to the usage generally characteristic of educated native speakers of a language — compare substandard

 

[mhaze]

That is an exaggeration.

Irrespective of whether you have misunderestimated the exaggeration, doesn't the underlying issue have substantive merit?

 

[funk de fino]

Suit yourself. I'm sure that because man-mouse eg chimera products are so funny, you won't want the results of that research when you need to grow a new spinal cord.

I think I would be behind you in the queue.

 

[mhaze]

I think I would be behind you in the queue.

Right. And it doesn't bother me one bit if you are left crying and whining in your wheelchair, while after the spinal cord regenerative process tested and proven in mouse-human neural cell experiments, I'm running marathons.

Have fun, baby.

 

[Thunder]

I think O'Donnel meant to say "humans with mice brains".

 

[BenBurch]

I think O'Donnel meant to say "humans with mice brains".

A certain poster here appears to already have one of those.

 

[INRM]

"Human embryonic stem cells injected into the brains of fetal mice can develop into functioning adult brain cells" =/= "American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains"

Looks like she took the statement out of context

 

[johnny karate]

That context being "reality".

 

[Puppycow]

More Comedy Gold from Simple Christine!

Christine O'Donnell Flashback: 'Evolution Is A Myth'

Well then why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?

 

[Cleon]

More Comedy Gold from Simple Christine!

Christine O'Donnell Flashback: 'Evolution Is A Myth'

Well, if nothing else, the logical contortions needed to excuse this one are going to be interesting to watch....

 

[The Painter]

I would vote for a mouse with a human brain before I would vote for a lot of candidates out there.

 

[Lurker]

O'Donnell won because she promoted fiscal insanity - that the government not spend trillions of money that it does not have. Indeed this is insane. Any rational person knows we can borrow from our children and their child without asking their permission.

It seems to have worked for the last 50+ years. If it is so incendiary to run a deficit, why no collapse here in the US? Can you tell us at what point it becomes a problem? What is the tipping point? You will note that plenty of others have made your economic doomsday predictions and to date, none have come true.

 

[Lurker]

Well, if nothing else, the logical contortions needed to excuse this one are going to be interesting to watch....

I like people who are far too dumb to understand science but far too arrogant to know when to shut up. They make for great quotables.

 

[Biscuit]

So? That was my point. Who are the people voting for? What caused O'Donnell to win the Republican primary, against the wishes of Republican strategists?

As for whether her fiscal ideas are vague or not, I wouldn't be so sure. You could go look on her website and that matter would no doubt be clarified. Your saying her fiscal ideas are vague does not make that true.

Not in the least.

Then again, it would say something about the electorate, either in the case of their being "vague" by your standards, or not. In either case, that is the issue that voters are moving on.

Side issues and smear campaigns designed to misdirect from fiscal, economic policy and unemployment rates will quite likely backfire or be tuned out by the voters.

Well I am happy to oblige. This is what her website says on "spending"

Believes unrestrained government spending is eroding our freedom, destroying our economy and ceding our sovereignty to foreign debt- holders like China.

Ummmm ok. Her spending policy is based on a belief system. Thats as specific as her own campaign website gets. In fact she isn't very specific about anything.

In fact the only statement that is more than one sentence is under values. There she has a two sentence opinion.

http://christine2010.com/why-christine/

So when she is vague on policy does it make her policies vague?

 

[mhaze]

It seems to have worked for the last 50+ years. If it is so incendiary to run a deficit, why no collapse here in the US? Can you tell us at what point it becomes a problem? What is the tipping point? You will note that plenty of others have made your economic doomsday predictions and to date, none have come true.

Huh? My comment was directed to why O'Donnell won, because she promoted fiscal issues. In other words, she focused on the primary issues of concern to voters.

Stem cell research ethics ain't of concern to voters this election cycle.

It's pretty simple.

 

[johnny karate]

Huh? My comment was directed to why O'Donnell won, because she promoted fiscal issues. In other words, she focused on the primary issues of concern to voters.

Yeah, her comprehensive economic policies are truly ground-breaking.

Stem cell research ethics ain't of concern to voters this election cycle.

Exactly. As long as some opportunistic, professional candidate comes along and basically says "I like all the things that you like", who cares if she might be functionally retarded?

It's pretty simple.

"Simple" is definitely an apt description.