T'ai Chi: Any progress with web page?

[CFLarsen]

Just curious: Will we see the efforts of your hard work on that webpage of yours anytime soon?

I am specifically looking forward to seeing your critiques of some of the content on SkepticReport, as well as your post counts of mine and Clancie's - for all to see and evaluate. Don't forget to explain how you counted the posts.

Of course, we should also be able to see the many transcripts you had people dig up for you. Perhaps you will also put up the count of letters as well? At the very least, you could let those who signed up to help you know how far you have gotten.

 

[T'ai Chi]

My answer: Nope not yet.

I have a question for you: got your IP address evidence yet re: Lucianarchy?

Your answer: .... ?

 

[CFLarsen]

Re: Re: T'ai Chi: Any progress with web page?

My answer: Nope not yet.

Can you give any indication when you will have something to show us? Is it going to be next week, next month, next year?

It isn't as if you have to gather more information, you have everything: You have the transcripts, you have had months to do the tallying, you have had months to write your critiques (some you can even lift from here), you already have the post counts....so, what's stopping you?

I have a question for you: got your IP address evidence yet re: Lucianarchy?

Your answer: .... ?

Please take that to the appropriate thread.

 

[T'ai Chi]

Re: Re: Re: T'ai Chi: Any progress with web page?

IP evidence ... ?

 

[CFLarsen]

Please respect the subject of a thread. Do not try to hijack threads.

Can you give any indication when you will have something to show us? Is it going to be next week, next month, next year?

 

[T'ai Chi]

IP evidence... ?

Provide evidence for your claim.

 

[CFLarsen]

Next week, next month, next year?

Ever?

 

[T'ai Chi]

IP evidence.... ?

 

[Rose]

I feel like I'm watching a tennis match without a ball being used...

 

[CFLarsen]

T'ai Chi,

Can I ask you to be a tad more serious here?

You are the one who wanted to create this webpage of yours. You are the one who wanted to put all that stuff up on it. Why can't we know when - or if, it seems - we will see something?

 

[T'ai Chi]

Whatever Cantata.


IP evidence... ?

Why must you keep your evidence a secret?

 

[CFLarsen]

Tell me something: Why are you here?

 

[Ed]

Posted 9/21/2003 by t'ai:

Asking for opinions is not trolling.

If you've read the article, I'd like to see your criticisms of DAT.

I'm still editing my critique of it.

I suspect that we will see the web page sometime after the "critique" is done. I am also interested in the transcript analysis. T'ai, how many model airplanes do you have 1/2 finished?

 

[UnTrickaBLe]

IP evidence.... ?

Stop trying to divert attention. Stop trying to avoid the topic of this thread.

 

[TheERK]

Why is this a thread, and not a PM? Larsen, if your only concern is to get the answer to the question in the OP, why is the creation of a thread necessary?

 

[T'ai Chi]

More Clauzz evasion.

IP evidence... ?

Why must you keep your evidence a secret?

 

[T'ai Chi]

I suspect that we will see the web page sometime after the "critique" is done. I am also interested in the transcript analysis. T'ai, how many model airplanes do you have 1/2 finished?

Ed, I posted my critique of DAT in various posts in that thread as already mentioned long ago. I simply posted my critique in various posts. Why do you still think I mean some long article or something?

Ed, so you can change the topic? Yeah, I don't think Clauzz will get on your case for that though.

But let's get back to DAT. Let's get to how confused Hoyt was for critiquing me for saying that if 'psi' stuff doesn't exist, then the DAT methods were just a pseudo-RNG (which is a very skeptical stance), and them him trying to convince me that "my" PRNG was flawed, even though it has similar parts to a NIST PRNG test, and, even though it is obvious, I got that in writing from an expert. Then he yells "copyright violation!" when I post that after he asks me to post it. Then I get clarification that it was indeed OK to post it. Then Bill has even more demands (like seeing specific emails, even though he just got done telling me they are all copyrighted and I can't post or send them!) and refuses to debate further. Interested in skeptical discussion my butt.

But hey, you brought up DAT, so Clauzzz, don't yell at me for "changing the topic".

You can provide your IP evidence anytime...

 

[T'ai Chi]

Stop trying to divert attention. Stop trying to avoid the topic of this thread.

Untrickable, then shut me up. Help him find that evidence that would show evidence for his claim of IP similarity.

You must like to pick and choose your skepticism like fundy's pick and choose Bible verses to interpret instead of take literally.

 

[LucyR]

I feel like I'm watching a tennis match without a ball being used...

Larsen'll still win three sets to love.

 

[T'ai Chi]

With no evidence for his claim re: IP address similarity???

The only entries on Larsen Lists are the number of his true believers...