T'ai Chi: Any progress with web page?

[CFLarsen]

Why is this a thread, and not a PM? Larsen, if your only concern is to get the answer to the question in the OP, why is the creation of a thread necessary?

Good question.

The webpage T'ai Chi has promised (but can't seem to be able to deliver) also contains material that does not deal with what I have written. E.g. he has promised to deliver a "critique", but it doesn't seem to be forthcoming.

More Clauzz evasion.

IP evidence... ?

Why must you keep your evidence a secret?

It is neither evasion or keeping it secret. I have explained this before, but you prefer to ignore it, so you can portray me as someone who does not answer questions or deliver evidence.

If you want to be taken a smidgen seriously, you could drop the incessant infantile name-games. Only 1st graders do that.

Ed, I posted my critique of DAT in various posts in that thread as already mentioned long ago. I simply posted my critique in various posts. Why do you still think I mean some long article or something?

I don't think I was the only one who expected a more thorough "critique" from you. While you were posting, you also pointed to this "critique" of yours, which would be upcoming. Then, you changed your mind, and merely pointed to your posts.

Ed, so you can change the topic? Yeah, I don't think Clauzz will get on your case for that though.

No, not really, because it is very much on topic: You promise, you promise, but you don't deliver.

But let's get back to DAT. Let's get to how confused Hoyt was for critiquing me for saying that if 'psi' stuff doesn't exist, then the DAT methods were just a pseudo-RNG (which is a very skeptical stance), and them him trying to convince me that "my" PRNG was flawed, even though it has similar parts to a NIST PRNG test, and, even though it is obvious, I got that in writing from an expert. Then he yells "copyright violation!" when I post that after he asks me to post it. Then I get clarification that it was indeed OK to post it. Then Bill has even more demands (like seeing specific emails, even though he just got done telling me they are all copyrighted and I can't post or send them!) and refuses to debate further. Interested in skeptical discussion my butt.

Look, if you want to "get back to DAT", get back to DAT. Don't turn it into yet another attempt of discussing your personal wars.

But hey, you brought up DAT, so Clauzzz, don't yell at me for "changing the topic".

I won't. It exemplifies perfectly how you argue here: You criticize people for what they write, and when called on it, you change the subject to "They are just morons, neener, neener...".

With no evidence for his claim re: IP address similarity???

The only entries on Larsen Lists are the number of his true believers...

Point proven.

 

[Ratman_tf]

Why is this a thread, and not a PM? Larsen, if your only concern is to get the answer to the question in the OP, why is the creation of a thread necessary?

I agree. Tai Chi and CFLarsen are eating up huge chunks of the MB now posting the same exact ◊◊◊◊ over and over again.

Mighty annoying.

 

[CFLarsen]

Hey, I just wanted to know if T'ai Chi is going to put up that promised webpage with aaaaaaall that stuff of his.

I guess he won't.

Too bad.

 

[Ersby]

I feel like I'm watching a tennis match without a ball being used...

Actually, this is what it looks like when two immovable objects crash into each other!

 

[CFLarsen]

Actually, this is what it looks like when two immovable objects crash into each other!

I can be moved....by evidence!

 

[Pragmatist]

Actually, this is what it looks like when two immovable objects crash into each other!

If they're immovable how can they crash?

 

[T'ai Chi]

Claus, got your IP address evidence yet?

Me saying I'll put up a webpage sometime isn't a claim. You claiming Lucianarchy's IP address is similar to another users IP address from another board, is a claim.

You fail to convince me you're a skeptic.

 

[CFLarsen]

Me saying I'll put up a webpage sometime isn't a claim. You claiming Lucianarchy's IP address is similar to another users IP address from another board, is a claim.

So, you are not going to put the material up, as you promised. Hot air.

You fail to convince me you're a skeptic.

I couldn't care less what you think. I am not here to convince you of anything. I am not here for you at all.

 

[T'ai Chi]

So, you are not going to put the material up, as you promised. Hot air.

"as I promised", that is a little exageration on your part. Next you'll be throwing around "liar" and similar words. Yeah, I might put up a webpage still, so? Is that a claim? Is that an extraordinary claim?

What does all of that to do with you providing evidence for your claim of IP address similarity?

I couldn't care less what you think. I am not here to convince you of anything. I am not here for you at all.

Well you're certainly not here to provide evidence for your claims. Got your IP address evidence yet?

I'll reiterate for you, dearie:

Me saying I'll put up a webpage sometime isn't a claim. You claiming Lucianarchy's IP address is similar to another users IP address from another board, is a claim.

So just show us your evidence, and quit being a hypocrite.

 

[Ersby]

If they're immovable how can they crash?

I'm just going to think of this thread as a zen experience, and be done with it!

 

[Ratman_tf]

Hey, I just wanted to know if T'ai Chi is going to put up that promised webpage with aaaaaaall that stuff of his.

I guess he won't.

Too bad.

Buuuuuuuuut Moooooooooom! He started it!

*Tsk* Tsk*

I wouldn't even mind it if these discussions were, like, going somewhere.

 

[T'ai Chi]

He could have PM'd me, but I think he wants the attention for himself, and free advertising for skepticreport.

Oh, that and apparently my idea of putting up a webpage is crucial for all skeptics to know about...

 

[CFLarsen]

He could have PM'd me, but I think he wants the attention for himself, and free advertising for skepticreport.

Not at all. PM'ing you has no effect, as we know. You will merely ignore the PM's you don't like.

Oh, that and apparently my idea of putting up a webpage is crucial for all skeptics to know about...

Not at all. But it does show that you promise more than you can keep...

 

[TheERK]

Hey, I just wanted to know if T'ai Chi is going to put up that promised webpage with aaaaaaall that stuff of his.

I guess he won't.

Too bad.

The point being, if you just wanted to know, you could have simply asked him in a private message. Surely you don't expect other people here to answer for him.

 

[jj]

The point being, if you just wanted to know, you could have simply asked him in a private message. Surely you don't expect other people here to answer for him.

The point being that T'ai Chi has been attempting to out-Claus Claus, by running around, asking failed or suborned questions, and then stalking people with the "so why won't you answer my question" nonsense.

But ask him a question, and ooooohhh! suddenly that's something WRONG to do?????

 

[Ratman_tf]

He could have PM'd me, but I think he wants the attention for himself, and free advertising for skepticreport.

Oh, that and apparently my idea of putting up a webpage is crucial for all skeptics to know about...

Nooooooooo Mom, HE started it!

 

[T'ai Chi]

blah blah

jj, you and Claus and Bill lately haven't been answering questions put towards you.

Bill purposely ignores.

Claus "answers" by asking more questions.

And you claim all questions I put forth are misleading "whipsaws".

Interesting! If any of you could actually answer them, that would be impressive.

 

[CFLarsen]

The point being, if you just wanted to know, you could have simply asked him in a private message. Surely you don't expect other people here to answer for him.

No, not at all. Where do you get that from?

It's not just my stuff he said he was going to put up. It's also the transcripts that people worked hard to get him. By going back on his word, he is pissing on those who volunteered their time and efforts, only to help him out.

jj, you and Claus and Bill lately haven't been answering questions put towards you.

Bill purposely ignores.

Claus "answers" by asking more questions.

And you claim all questions I put forth are misleading "whipsaws".

Interesting! If any of you could actually answer them, that would be impressive.

Your dishonesty is truly amazing.

 

[T'ai Chi]

Your dishonesty is truly amazing.

Just provide evidence for your claim of IP similarity...

 

[Lucianarchy]

Why is this a thread, and not a PM? Larsen, if your only concern is to get the answer to the question in the OP, why is the creation of a thread necessary?

Claus, how mnay questions have you asked me in PM?