Bosnian scenario is the only possibility for Syrian quagmire to end. It's not like Russo-Iranian forces can triumph any time soon, or that their triumph would result in a governable country.
Thus far they managed to severely maul the smallest and weakest of the three rebel sides in Syria. It only took some 15 months of sustained Russian intervention to get to a point where they no longer control many major population centers and have agreed to a cease fire of sorts. Russian military budget was seriously slashed this year, so I don't expect them to do much more of this. The other two sides - ISIS and Kurds - are at each others' throats, but since Assad has announced he will defeat both of them, I suppose he intends to fight both of them as well. If so the war won't be over by the end of the
next decade.
It would seem that Russia is keenly aware of this and is pushing hard to basically agree to rebel demands from 2011 and then some. The country is no longer to be 'Arab', it will no longer demand the president to be of Muslim faith or the laws to be in compliance with Sharia, it will limit the powers of the president to basically a ceremonial role, they seek to establish multiparty rule, give full rights to the Kurds, lift the state of emergency and so on. If regime had capitulated six years ago and gave in to all demands, they would likely get away with more than this.
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/a...ria-name-change-draft-constitution-1563058466
They'll spin it as a victory, no doubt. Make no mistake though, if, after six years of war, you basically agree to demands your opponents had before the war started, you did not win the war. I'm sure Putin cheerleaders will disagree, but that's the reality of the situation. This is more of Versailles peace of 1919 than anything else.
McHrozni