Suddenly, A Flat Earther Appears!

It may be time for you to sit with Daniel with crayons and explain it too him in baby language...lol

I have a 16 months old daughter, I am sure she can understand several concepts faster than Daniel can.
 
NEVER.




Really?? How would they know that....Special evo Mind Powers?
Nope. Evidence.

Let's see, would you wager say $50,000 (US) on your feeble claim here?
Is that not a sin?

I have 3 Honorable Discharges--- and obviously 3 DD 214's, and a Metric Ton of Monthly Military Retiree Electronic Account Statements (eRAS's) LOL. C'mon, Make My Day!!!
I had three honourable discharges last night alone. She was most satisfied.

Never said I was, oh King of the Straw Man Fallacy.
Correct. You claimed that you trained with snipers. That could mean that you were a civvie catering sub-contractor. I think I might have a few words with those good men over at stolenvalor.com

Let's see if you can back up your feeble 'Guess in the Dark' with some of that color :D
No guessing required. You revealed your fantasy by being utterly ignorant of ballistics or even basic physics.


Ha.
 
Daniel said he became a FlatEarther just 6 weeks ago, after some Flat Earthers posed him questions he could not answer.

Daniel dos not want to prove the Earth is flat.

He wants to prove he can win an argument. 'Win' will be in his own terms obviously.
 
So you're saying the Sun Rises in the West and Sets in the East in the Northern Hemisphere BUT...

Rises in the East and Sets in the Wast in the Southern Hemisphere ??

And you want me to EXPLAIN this, eh? I'm sorry, that's well beyond my pay grade; it's a "Clinical" situation.


regards

I really don't know why I am bothering, but in the Northern Hemisphere, outside the Tropics and the Arctic Circle the Sun rises in the East, and sets in the West, just as in the Southern Hemisphere, outside the Tropics and Antarctic Circle.

However in these regions of the Northern Hemisphere the Sun appears to travel clockwise (i.e when the sun is at its highest, at local noon, it is due South). In the Southern Hemisphere outside the Tropics and Antarctic Circle, the Sun appears to travel anticlockwise, so at local noon, the Sun is due North.

The think is that you can easily see this for yourself by visiting a temperate country in the opposite hemisphere to the one where you live and noting the apparent movement of the Sun during the day.

Whereas someone who thinks that a bullet fired horizontally will vary in the time it takes to hit the ground depending on muzzle velocity clearly lives in an embarrassment free zone.

To be fair, if the bullet is fast enough, then he is right. One way of thinking about orbital velocity is that with an orbiting projectile, the Earth's surface falls away at the same speed as the projectile falls towards it.
 
Please explain how different countries experience day and night offset by several hours. Sometimes 12.


Oh, no, Daniel. You don't get to use that flat earth model. That model is trivially false: observers in South America, Southern Africa and Australia would all look in completely different directions when they each look South. But in the real world when they each look South they can see the same constellations.

Busted. Your attempt to reconcile flat-earthery with reality fails.
 
Looking at this not as a scientist, but as a connoisseur of the literary, I hope others are as amused as I am by the rhetorical flourishes seen here. No cock on a dunghill has crowed with such exuberance. Well played.

The bluster is strong in this one.
 
Are you just playing dumb here? Nope, you just dodged the point.

It's very simple, if the Sun is at zenith 2,500 miles up and 6,000 miles away it should be setting, it cannot possibly be a flat Earth. It cannot be a flat Earth because the Sun at that height and distance forms a 21 degree angle. If you claim perspective makes it disappear, how come it doesn't.

Address this, Daniel.

If the sun was directly overhead at noon, then six hours later it would be on the horizon and setting. But on your flat earth it wouldn't be on the horizon at all. It would be about 6,000 miles away and 2,500 miles up, so it should be more than 20 degrees above the horizon.

Busted.
 
Last edited:
Address this, Daniel.

If the sun was directly overhead at noon, then six hours later it would be on the horizon and setting. But on your flat earth it wouldn't be on the horizon at all. It would be about 6,000 mies away and 2,500 miles up, so it should be more than 20 degrees above the horizon.

Busted.

You are arguing with someone who uses a photo showing the curvature of the Earth as evidence that the Earth is flat.
 
You are arguing with someone who uses a photo showing the curvature of the Earth as evidence that the Earth is flat.

Well I'm not sure that "arguing with" really covers it. That might suggest he was making a substantive defence of his claims.
 
Last edited:
Daniel dos not want to prove the Earth is flat.

He wants to prove he can win an argument. 'Win' will be in his own terms obviously.

When I worked in Seattle we had a crazy guy who would hang out near our building and tell us that his god was coming to punish us all and the UN was going to take over America and bring the antichrist. He won all of his arguments too.
 
What stops the atmosphere falling off the edge?

Jow far down will we have to burrow to break through the underside if the earth?
What is on the underside?

Is Earth the only flat planet?
 
In what areas do you feel like you have an impact?


In the "Exposing" area. Watch:

Please provide ONE "Empirical Evidence" that we live on a "Spinning Ball" rotating @ 1,000 mph, revolving around the sun @ 66,600 mph (axis 66.6 degrees from the ecliptic), with the sun traveling @ 500,000 mph around the Milky Way---which is itself moving @ 670,000,000 mph ...?

regards
 
In the "Exposing" area. Watch:

Please provide ONE "Empirical Evidence" that we live on a "Spinning Ball" rotating @ 1,000 mph, revolving around the sun @ 66,600 mph (axis 66.6 degrees from the ecliptic), with the sun traveling @ 500,000 mph around the Milky Way---which is itself moving @ 670,000,000 mph ...?

regards


The astronauts saw (and photographed!) the ball spin when they went to the moon!

Booooom!

What do I win?!
 
Oh vey ... Argument by youtube ...
... who would have thought that?

Hans :p


Ahhh professor, 'youtube' is merely "A Medium" for goodness sakes :rolleyes:

Your appeal here is mind-numbing; it screams absolute bankruptcy. Are you saying "The Medium" is Fallacious ?? :jaw-dropp

And not that it matters in the least, the Elephants in the Room, that everyone has bumbled, stumbled, and fumbled with...

1. Entropy (Vacuum/Non-Vacuum)
2. Coriolis Effect
3. Naval Rail Gun

Were not "You-Tubed".

What's next...am I using the wrong font ? :boggled:


oy vey
 
The astronauts saw (and photographed!) the ball spin when they went to the moon!

Booooom!

What do I win?!


Screen Actors Guild Award and The Stanley Cup of Photo-Shop :thumbsup:

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon: www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4


Let's see (and shouldn't the Earth from the Moon be roughly 4 TIMES BIGGER than they're depicted here in some pics??)...

Apollo%208_zpslhvq3nog.png
Apollo%208%20Fake_zps94f1r2ph.png


Apollo%2011%20B_zps5fxxkkhv.png
Apollo%2011%20B%20Fake_zpsazy40grj.png


Apollo%2011_zpslyc4pigj.png
Apollo%2011%20A%20Contrast%20Fake_zpso9u9ovbk.png


Apollo%2013_zps8cjpxmte.png
Apollo%2013%20Fake_zpsaphptpta.png


Apollo%2015_zpskr3o13yy.png
Apollo%2015%20Fake_zpsausne1wv.png


Apollo%2017%20A_zpszqgh5eqv.png
Apollo%2017%20A%20Fake_zpsmlo1nxt8.png



The Blue Marble:

Clouds%20Cloning%20Tool_zps0trhaukv.jpg


Looks like somebody got a bit too 'trigger happy' with the "Cloning" Tool. :rolleyes:


A%20Earth%20Rise%20JAXA%20Photoshopped_zpszsytbm25.png


These are so laughable the US Press don't even cover these guys anymore.

I've got about 50 or so more. If you're lazy, just download the originals from nasa.gov and 'Plop Them' in here: Jeffrey's Image Metadata Viewer: regex.info/exif.cgi and let the healing begin!! (or the Cognitive Dissonance continue )


regards
 
"Rotating at 1000 mph" is silly.

As for one piece of evidence, I have seen a Foucault's Pendulum in the Devonshire Dome, which is in my next-door town.

There is probably one near you - Here is a handy list of Foucault's Pendulums

Indeed it is silly to say the earth is rotating at 1,000 mph. It's approximately true for points on the equator, but increasingly wrong at higher latitudes. And I'm amused by Daniel's stressing the three sixes in 66,600 mph and 66.6° as if it were a portent of anything.
 

Back
Top Bottom