Hi all,
I too read through this thread but was too shy to reply. A big part of my job is serving as 'university observer' for many, many students who I barely know. As a teacher trainer/educator, it is scary how little one can do to change anything about such a situation, or any situation. In teaching, one learns by, well, teaching. Slingblade at least got to teach. Some students get in with a situation where the main person can't seem to ever give up the podium. Others get into crappy schools, or with mentors who have no clue at all. The best situations are good. Young novice observes from, talks to, plans with wise elder. The power is transferred gradually, and at the end it's just like the lord of the frigging rings with an old Bilbo.
In my dreams! My way is to take good notes on my observations, related to teaching and pedagogy, delivery, etc., and then present them in an immediate face-to-face meeting. This is almost completely positive information, with some "frontiers for exploration and improvement." I write those up in a simple format (timeline, what I saw, what I thought) and send them to the student only. I have never gotten a complaint and only a wish that I could have been more involved. But the reality is that I can't spend quantity time with anybody, and therefore quality counts.
I have never had to deal with an obvious mismatch of student, mentor, and situation as Slingblade has presented to us. It could have been so much the better for everyone if the actors had been in different plays. Who sets up these assignments? Do they even know the first thing about the people involved, or are they just looking at maps?
BP