Stubblebine Speaks...

Justin39640 said:
really bill?
REALLY?

after 8 years and youve never bothered to look at this
[qimg]http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/pentagon_sections.jpg[/qimg]
did you?

why do you lie like that?
trolling isnt the word
Click to expand...

How many walls do you count ?
 
bill smith said:
Would you agree that 9/11 was an inside job if a plane very much like the one in the photo in all the ways that count went through six concrete walls at the Petagon on 9/11 ?
http://nomoregames.net/presentations/Madison_No_Planes_Final_August_07.ppt_files/slide0045_image034
Click to expand...

here ya go bill
keep lying
pentagonbll.png
 
bill smith said:
Listen to the bullet coming back, 500 mph is not the speed pf light.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ABGIJwiGBc
Click to expand...

stop lying
stop trying to change the subject
that plane lurched forward it was probably going slower than 10 mph and punched through a wall up to the 1st door

if it did that much damage how much can a plane doing 500 do?

and i cant find the story your pic is from
but it happened another time at Newark Int in NJ

http://www.airliners.net/photo/092008/M
from link said:
N16884 (cn 48074/1026) It is said that the aircraft's engines were accidentally started at gate 115... brakes not set ... Declared damaged beyond economical repair.
Click to expand...

emphasis mine

ETA: your own pics debunk you EVERYTIME
just stop already
 
Last edited:
Justin39640 said:
stop lying
stop trying to change the subject
that plane lurched forward it was probably going slower than 10 mph and punched through a wall up to the 1st door

if it did that much damage how much can a plane doing 500 do?

and i cant find the story your pic is from
but it happened another time at Newark Int in NJ

http://www.airliners.net/photo/092008/M


emphasis mine

ETA: your own pics debunk you EVERYTIME
just stop already
Click to expand...

If I am getting you right you think that this plane in the photo has penetrated the building and that the image does not show a plane heavily damaged by a fairly minor impact with a relatively light concrete wall ?
http://nomoregames.net/presentations/Madison_No_Planes_Final_August_07.ppt_files/slide0045_image034
 
Last edited:
bill you should seriously get some help. You are probably only like 15 so you do have some hope of living a normal life if you get that desperately needed help soon.
 
bill smith said:
If I am getting you right you think hat this plane in the photo has penetrated the building and that the image does not show a plane heavily damaged by a fairly minor impact with a relatively light concrete wall ?
http://nomoregames.net/presentations/Madison_No_Planes_Final_August_07.ppt_files/slide0045_image034
Click to expand...

stop lying

how many walls at the pentagon (answer 2)

youre comparing grapes to those giant pumpkins

youre either a liar or a complete idiot
which is it?
 
Justin39640 said:
stop lying

how many walls at the pentagon (answer 2)

youre comparing grapes to those giant pumpkins

youre either a liar or a complete idiot
which is it?
Click to expand...

I'd say our unseen audience is enjoying this little show Justin. Not as much as I am though.lol
 
dtugg said:
bill you should seriously get some help. You are probably only like 15 so you do have some hope of living a normal life if you get that desperately needed help soon.
Click to expand...


I could be wrong, but I get the impression that Bill is not an angry, empty-headed kid, but a really sick old guy.
 
bill smith said:
The plane actually went hrough six steel reinforced walls and a small forest of vertical columns and survived intact enough to punch a perfect double-garage door-sized hole in the final wall. Pretty good for a 1mm thick aluminium, shell.
http://nomoregames.net/presentations/Madison_No_Planes_Final_August_07.ppt_files/slide0045_image034
Click to expand...

There were not six steerl reinforced walls sweetfoot. The only wall that was truely reinforced was the exterrior wall.
Also, can you please cite your source for this idiotic information??

Also, the fuselage did not make the hole in any of the rings, other than the outer ring. After that, it was the landing gear and the engines.

You posting a picture of a plane that crashed into a building doesn't prove anything. The only thing it proves is that the jet you posted was NOT going in excess of 500 MPH.

BTW, can anyone identify where this happened, or what type of airliner that is?? Its looks somewhat smaller than a 767, but I could be wrong.

Thanks!
 
bill smith said:
I'd say our unseen audience is enjoying this little show Justin. Not as much as I am though.lol
Click to expand...


So, the question remains, why do you enjoy being beaten to a pulp and humiliated? You're never right. You always lose. Your lies always get exposed. How does your insane movement profit from your constant failures?
 
bill smith said:
I'd say our unseen audience is enjoying this little show Justin. Not as much as I am though.lol
Click to expand...

Sorry folks. Looks like the show's over for now. Tune in again for another episode of 'debunker tail-twisting' produced and directed by bill smith.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Sorry folks. Looks like the show's over for now. Tune in again for another episode of 'debunker tail-twisting' produced and directed by bill smith.
Click to expand...

ah so youre just a lying (rule 10) who thinks the events of 911 are a laugh riot

hopefully that series is getting canceled soon lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom