Stubblebine Speaks...

Bill's disingenuous semantical game reminded me of the classic exchange from "Animal House" between Flounder and Boon:

F: "I can't believe I threw up in front of Dean Wormer."

B: "Face it, kid, you threw up on Dean Wormer."


No, Bill, a plane that has crashed into a building did not crash near the building.
 
Iwas laughing at Jamie McIntyre's revealing explanation for why he said 'there is no evidence that a plane crashed anywhere near the Pentagon' as I suspect you well know. See post #127 on this page for a full viewing of the facts,

NB. Concerned Citizens reading this exchange should watch carefully the techniques employed by the debunkers ro discredit the Truth Movement. Ask yourself why they would go to such ridiculous lengths ?


Yes, Bill, ask yourself why you and your fellow frauds go to such insanely ridiculous lengths to distort the plain meaning of the words of people who reject your idiocy.
 
Justin,

I agree. I myself attended every single funeral for my fallen friends. I shed more tears in the weeks following 9/11 than I have shed in my entire life. Heck, even that day, as I waas hearing the PASS (PASS Device is an alarm that will go off if a firefighter doesn't move for a certain time. They have saved many firefighters, including myself) devices going off, and scrambling to try to rescue the fallen, I had tears in my eyes. Quite a few times I had to stop and take a break, because it was just too much. Heck, I was a still pretty new at the time.

And for someone like Bill to think that it's funny when someone clearly points out that people DIED in a plane crash, and he LAUGHS at their comments, its repulsive.

BTW, thanks for the link. Amazing.

Bill,

Why do you people (I use that term VERY loosely) think its cool to take people's comments out of context?? Especially so BLATENTLY?!?!?!?!?! WTF is wrong with you things???
 
ummm it isn't thta he has expressed an interest in the paranormal.

It is his BELIEF that he can KILL with his mind. It is his stated BELIEF that he can walk through walls. It is his BELIEF that he is a JEDI. It is his BELIEF that he can remote view with accuracy of events.

It isn't an "interest in the paranormal" it is BAT **** CRAZY.

It's one thing to dream of Camelot but proclaiming that you are Lancelot is generally off limits.
 
Gracias, Senor Hummus,

Like most of us, I strongly suspect, I've collected my own version of definitive answers and links. And simply cut & paste. That's a big time saver.

The folks here have wised up to Bill's routine in relatively short order. I've had an almost 2 year head start on his shenanigans.

Bill is a "special" character. As such, he deserves, IMO, "special" attention.


Tom

No problem, sir. Anytime.

And yes, I think we all have our own little compendium of links to lean on. Heck, mine's so large, I've got 2 levels of subfolders just to keep 'em straight. There are times I've wished I had a bookmarks search feature :boggled:. But, I've found that I lean on Gravy's site, Mike's, and the search function here the most; Gravy's, while only being a small amount of the information that's out there, still stands as one of the most encyclopedic. And Mike W's has some of the most straightforward explanations around.

The shame of it is that both of them do little more than link publicly available information. The more I use their sites as gateways to accurate information about 9/11, the more I realize just how pathetic 9/11 conspiracy peddlers are about their material; the rebuttals to their distortions and mistruths are so publicly and readily available that it has convinced me that you actually need to purposely turn a blind eye to truth in order to believe in the 9/11 conspiracy fantasy. It's one thing to be taken in on a minute, isolated point and think there's something legitimate there; as I've said before, the thing that captured me was being unable to explain the "molten steel" issue properly, despite my degree in chemistry. Individual elements can have compelling albeit misleading truther explanations to them. But it's an entirely separate thing to continue to see rebuttal after rebuttal and still think there's an element of accuracy or truth to the so-called "Truth" movement. I saw the work they put into distortion after just one, single topic; it blows my mind to see others continually get the truth thrown, spoon fed, translated, diagrammed, and hurled at them over and over and still hold their beliefs in the fictional conspiracy. That sort of mentality rises to the level of pathology.

Anyway, you're welcome. And as a slight derail: Maybe we ought to have a "bookmarks sharing" thread at some point. That might be interesting. I'm going to ponder that for a bit here...
 
We are all familiar with the drill: you tell a whopping lie; you get caught; you bluster clumsily; you get thoroughly smacked down; you run away. Nothing new here.

Although you've abandoned the field after yet another humiliation, I want to continue for a bit. You dishonestly pretended that Jamie McIntyre, a reality-based human who shares none of your idiotic delusions, lent support to the insane notion that no plane crashed into the Pentagon. In fact, he did nothing of the sort. He complained to Wolf Blitzer, a Bush-bashing liberal Democrat, that conspiracy nuts were making it appear as though he denied that AA77 hit the building. He set the record straight.

For pathological reasons, his clarification reduced you to hysteria. I would bet heavily that you didn't laugh at all--you were lying again. But, for argument's sake, let's take you at your word. What provoked your laughter? McIntyre wasn't caught in anything. You were caught promoting another falsehood, which, come to think of it, is all you do. Really. You are never right and you never tell the truth.

How utterly stupid do you have to be to say that I accused Jamie McIntyre of anything in that post #127 FineWine ?
I simply reported verbatim what was said in two news clips and said that I found his ludicrous explanation laughable. I don't think anybody iwill have any doubt left about what type of person you are after these last half dozen exchanges.
 
How utterly stupid do you have to be to say that I accused Jamie McIntyre of anything in that post #127 FineWine ?
I simply reported verbatim what was said in two news clips and said that I found his ludicrous explanation laughable. I don't think anybody iwill have any doubt left about what type of person you are after these last half dozen exchanges.

jamie- a plane didnt hit the lawn it hit the building
bill laughs uncontrollably

and i thought i had a dark sense of humor

what else do you find "funny" bill

hey tri
i must have driven under at least 50 arches in the 1st 6 months
niagra falls every time

the whole metro NY area was depressed for 6 months at least
you could just feel it and see it in everyones face
there was almost NO crime in NYC for almost a month after
even the criminals were sad
:(
 
Yeah, you are a fool(and disingenuous). That is not even a hole. It is the burned front of a building.

Here is the hole before the fire, after the collision with the 7 whatever 7.
[qimg]http://thetruthnews.info/pentagon%20hole.jpg[/qimg]


Look ma, no airplane.

And why no damage to the B-ring?

Because a bomb blew a hole in the C-ring.
 
it only had enough force to go through 2 walls not 3 plus in that area between b and c there was plenty of room for the forces that created the puchout hole to dissipate (open air)
before the c ring it was all trapped in the building
 
it only had enough force to go through 2 walls not 3 plus in that area between b and c there was plenty of room for the forces that created the puchout hole to dissipate (open air)
before the c ring it was all trapped in the building

sure it did.
 
Last edited:
I didn't say I had any kind of medical condition- ever. It is sad that you are reduced to an outright lie in a crude attempt to discredit me. If you cannot produce the post where i made the cnfession you claim then I strongly advise people on both sides of the argument to recognise you for the liar you are and to treat you accordingly. If they support you in this lie that will of course reflect strongly on themselves.
.
Wow, bill.

Hit a nerve there, didn't he?

Well, I suspect that what you say is true. That you haven't said you had any sort of medical condition.

Here, anyway.

LoL.

t
 
Last edited:
.
Wow, bill.

Hit a nerve there, didn't he?

Well, I suspect that what you say is true. That you haven't say you had any sort of medical condition.

Here, anyway.

LoL.

t

Yes, I was awfully awfully upset. I almost lost control I was so incensed.
 
How utterly stupid do you have to be to say that I accused Jamie McIntyre of anything in that post #127 FineWine ?
I simply reported verbatim what was said in two news clips and said that I found his ludicrous explanation laughable. I don't think anybody iwill have any doubt left about what type of person you are after these last half dozen exchanges.


How utterly stupid do you have to be to find McIntyre's perfectly clear and reasonable explantion ludicrous? We all know what type of person you are: obtuse, hate-filled, dishonest, and ignorant.
Imagine the gall of agenda-driven lunatics who twist a man's words to pretend that he lends credence to insane crapola and then whine when he corrects the record!
The plane did not crash near the Pentagon, you dumb so-and-so; it crashed INTO the Pentagon.
 
Last edited:
bill, if you don't mind me asking, what exact condition(s) do you suffer from? Knowing the answer to this would help explain a lot.
 
And why no damage to the B-ring?

Because a bomb blew a hole in the C-ring.


Stop lying. There were no bombs. Have someone read excerpts from the Pentagon Building Performance report to you. You won't learn anything, of course.
 
How utterly stupid do you have to be to say that I accused Jamie McIntyre of anything in that post #127 FineWine ?
I simply reported verbatim what was said in two news clips and said that I found his ludicrous explanation laughable. I don't think anybody iwill have any doubt left about what type of person you are after these last half dozen exchanges.
.
Hmmmm, bill.

Do you understand the English language? You write it. But the words don't contain meaning...

For example, here you say:

"... How utterly stupid do you have to be to say that I accused Jamie McIntyre of anything in that post #127 ..."

And in the very next sentence, you say:
"I simply reported verbatim what was said in two news clips and said that I found his ludicrous explanation laughable."

Saying that you "found his ludicrous explanation laughable" is semantically IDENTICAL to accusing him of lying. There is no way around it.

And then accuse FW of being "stupid" for observing the obvious...?

English, bill. It's called "English".

T

PS. You are a walking, squawking cliche, bill. A liar who cavilierly, effortlessly, baselessly calls lots of other people "liar".
 
bill, if you don't mind me asking, what exact condition(s) do you suffer from? Knowing the answer to this would help explain a lot.

Well if I use a cheap shampoo I tend to get dandruff so I usually use Umberto Giannini which avoids the problem and gives me a certain cachet. Two birds with one stone you see.
 
Last edited:
The plane actually went hrough six steel reinforced walls and a small forest of vertical columns and survived intact enough to punch a perfect double-garage door-sized hole in the final wall. Pretty good for a 1mm thick aluminium, shell.
http://nomoregames.net/presentations/Madison_No_Planes_Final_August_07.ppt_files/slide0045_image034

really bill?
REALLY?

after 8 years and youve never bothered to look at this
pentagon_sections.jpg

did you?

why do you lie like that?
trolling isnt the word
 

Back
Top Bottom