• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

StopSylvia email: "What??? Stop sylvia"

Roadtoad said:
Perhaps the most tragic element in all of this is that they probably never respond in return to Robert at all. They've said their peace, they have nothing more they want to do with him, simply because if they take it any further, they might actually have to face evidence. And that's not what they want to do.

It's a sad form of cowardice, one you would hope wouldn't exist, but there it is. It would be nice if they'd grow up a little and admit they might be wrong, but don't hold your breath.

Best to you, Robert and Susan, and Happy Holidays.
Click to expand...

Back atcha, O Toad of the Road!
 
I just hope, with each such reply I send, that the correspondent actually takes up the "challenge". Searching for What Browne got "right" will, it is hoped, cause them to reassess their opinion of her "abilities", and researching my site to find what I got "wrong" will, I hope, cause them to reassess their opinion of the site AND of Browne.

While many/most who don't write again probably never took up the challenges, maybe never even bothered to read my reply, I like to instead imagine them doing the research, muttering to themselves "I'll show HIM a thing or two!" and slowly, sadly, realizing it ain't gonna be as easy as they at first thought. And the seed is planted...
 
What I find amazing is that Robert recieves one hateful email after another, yet continues to remain polite and respectful in his replies. I pride myself on my patience but I think eventually that one final email would come that would make me go ballistic.
 
LogicFail said:
Here's what i wanna know (and maybe some of the legal types can answer this).

How is it that if I lead a financial seminar and charge an exorbitant sum promising that mys system will help you get rich and it turns out to be a scam I can go to jail. Yet, someone like Sylvia Browne can go and charge exorbitant sums claiming to be a psychic and it's a scam and nothing happens? Isn't it the same scam in a different suit of clothes?
Click to expand...

Any "legal types" have a response to this? I'm also interested in the details.

I'm not a legal type; my only comment is that I'm not sure if the first part of the "if __, then __" is true in all cases either.

Oh, and my only other comment is that Sylvia probably has very good lawyers that tell her exactly what she can, and cannot, say under US law.
 
"Sylvia has very good lawyers"?

Have you read the letter one of her attorneys sent me in an attempt to shut my site down?
 
RSLancastr said:
"Sylvia has very good lawyers"?

Have you read the letter one of her attorneys sent me in an attempt to shut my site down?
Click to expand...

Sounds like a story that needs telling. (and I just know you are going to say it's on your site...)

;)
 
OnlyTellsTruths said:
Any "legal types" have a response to this? I'm also interested in the details.

I'm not a legal type; my only comment is that I'm not sure if the first part of the "if __, then __" is true in all cases either.

Oh, and my only other comment is that Sylvia probably has very good lawyers that tell her exactly what she can, and cannot, say under US law.
Click to expand...

I am not sure about the US, but there are special laws around here for financial and legal advice. As long as a seminar points out that there is a risk with every investment they should be good.

And I agree: Nobody sees a need to go after psychics. Sylvia specifically has built a religion around her services, which makes it extra-difficult to go after her, too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom