Star Wars Beam Weapon and the WTC Bathtub

I am in possession of some very detailed and documented information regarding this "Star Wars Beam Weapon".

Every time I speak with my "high level source" on the phone on this very subject, it sounds like someone is picking up another line in the house and pressing one button, then the redial button sequence.

This has happened multiple times.

Plus strange clicking, like someone picked up the other line, then hangs up.

The clicking sometimes happens any time I speak with anyone regarding the WTC and the "beam weapon".

Please be aware that neither me or my "high level source" will commit suicide and will drive extra careful.

Please stay tuned and pray for me but don't worry too much I've recently purchased an extra supply of tin-foil to protect me.

Regards,
Spins.
 
maccy said:
Welcome to the forums Dubito and bourgeois_rage! You sure picked a crazy thread for an early post!

Although it could have been worse, you could ahve picked Christopehera's concrete core realistice thread.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the welcome, Bronze Dog pointed me here, you can blame him.

This moon idea is very interesting. It seems the ancients knew what they were talking about when there referred to the "man in the moon." Obviously they were seeing into the future of George W. Bush.
 
Horatius said:
Someone beat you to it.

But don't despair. Most Cts fail in their first year. Give it another shot, but this time with more crazy.
Click to expand...
Clearly, that book was written by the PTB in conjunction with the Illuminati and Opus Dei, in order to make the truth look ridiculous. Don't believe their lies!!

maccy said:
Welcome to the forums Dubito and bourgeois_rage! You sure picked a crazy thread for an early post!

Although it could have been worse, you could ahve picked Christopehera's concrete core realistice thread.
Click to expand...
I assume that by "crazy" you mean "absolutely right and not insane in the least." :)

I ended up here through Rockstars' Ramblings, though I've floated around the main page for the site more than once. Thanks for the welcome!

TF
 
Dubito said:
Clearly, that book was written by the PTB in conjunction with the Illuminati and Opus Dei, in order to make the truth look ridiculous. Don't believe their lies!!
Click to expand...

Getting closer. Throw in few more mentions of the book being pure disinfo, and me being a shill, and you're there.


:D
 
Well, glad to know that someone was paying attention to that little post of mine. No comments were coming in, and I don't often look at my out clicks.

Of course, there could be some comments tied up in moderation. I'm in some kind of weird time warp, and I'm getting all of today's email in almost reverse order. Need to double check to see if I received any emails before they were sent.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
What we do know, loud JREF assertions to the contrary, is that some large source of energy was present at the world trade center on 9/11, far in excess of the energy available due to an elevated mass.
Click to expand...


This post of yours was dismissed far too easily, although it was addressed directly. There was in fact, a large source of energy present at the world trade center on 9/11 far in excess of the energy available due to an elevated mass. That energy was the impact and explosion of two jetliners.
 
quixotecoyote said:
There was in fact, a large source of energy present at the world trade center on 9/11 far in excess of the energy available due to an elevated mass. That energy was the impact and explosion of two jetliners.
Click to expand...
Wait a minute - the gravitational potential energy in the towers, due to all that mass suspended hundreds of feet in the air, dwarfed the energy available from the jet impacts and fuel explosions.
 
Equivalent energy;

Aircraft impacts 1300 to 2080 pounds of TNT (big)

Fuel as heat in each jet 315 tons of TNT (lots of heat)

Each tower potential energy 248 tons of TNT (lots of energy when it falls)

Energy in the fires of WTC stuff - Was a lot, but I have no numbers.

It all adds up to enough energy to do what we saw on 9/11 with out a few bombs or a lot of bombs or thermite, or a beam weapon, etc
 
Well perhaps I am mistaken, but doesn't 'in excess of' mean 'beyond that of'?

So if I have a 1 ton block of wood on my lawn, and then I toss a brick onto it, don't I now have a weight on my lawn in excess of 1 ton?
 
quixotecoyote said:
Well perhaps I am mistaken, but doesn't 'in excess of' mean 'beyond that of'?

So if I have a 1 ton block of wood on my lawn, and then I toss a brick onto it, don't I now have a weight on my lawn in excess of 1 ton?
Click to expand...
yeah, but the way you phrased it implied the impact energy alone was in excess fo the GPE alone
 
Housefly said:
I can't wait to see Truthseeker twist that quote around to suit himself.
"R. Mackey, who works for NASA, admits that it would take over an hour for a beam weapon to bring down a skyscraper. And, isn't this a coincidence, the towers took OVER AN HOUR to collapse!"
Don't try to frighten us with your sorceror's ways, Truthseeker1234.

Actually, isn't he also arguing for controlled demolition in other threads? So the government planted explosives in the towers, crashed planes into them, and then shot at them from space with a laser?

I've heard of overkill, but...
Click to expand...
Well they do claim the government is incompetent.
:dl:
 
defaultdotxbe said:
yeah, but the way you phrased it implied the impact energy alone was in excess fo the GPE alone
Click to expand...

Yeah, on re-reading it does come off that way, doesn't it. I was trying to point out the common mistake of looking for reasons for a collapse and ignoring the planes. It seemed he was saying there wasn't enough potential energy in the standing towers to collapse them without an external energy source, and incorrect as that may be, they was an external energy source which precipitated the collapse.
 
uk_dave said:
You mean Judy Wood did it?

I always wondered why she kept on about billiard balls. Now we know it was her subconcious urge to confess to the crime.

Nevermind about Silverstein and the meaning of 'pull'....Judy has practically writ her confession large on the internet.

Now, if only she would sign it....
Click to expand...
I thought she wrote about throwing her Ben Wa balls of the wtc...it was billiard. I really am ashamed.

:dl:
 
quixotecoyote said:
Well perhaps I am mistaken, but doesn't 'in excess of' mean 'beyond that of'?

So if I have a 1 ton block of wood on my lawn, and then I toss a brick onto it, don't I now have a weight on my lawn in excess of 1 ton?
Click to expand...

I agree the aircraft impact was significant! It would destroy my house and a few more; and look like a big bomb hit!

It was big! Bigger than the 93 bombing; the aircraft impacts alone!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom