Speculation on who Trump will pick for VP?

JoeMorgue said:
In another case of "There's no rule against it because WE NEVER THOUGHT IT WAS OPTION" someone suggest Trump picking Clarance Thomas as his running mate.
Click to expand...
More like there's no rule against it because the roach motel court is a modern contrivance.

Justice Charles Evans HughesWP ran for--and nearly won--the presidency in 1916.
 
Segnosaur said:
John Barron.

He probably knows Trump better than anyone, and is more than willing to praise him.
Click to expand...

Donald Trump Jr. Nah just kidding, he's not 35 years old yet, cognitively.

Kari Lake sounds like a possible choice as mentioned, or maybe Marsha Blackburn.
 
Last edited:
Upchurch said:
I genuinely thought Corsi was dead. I'm glad I checked before making fun of that option. Now, i can only make fun of it for being a bad choice because Corsi is a horrible person.
Click to expand...

Yes but he risk Prison to save Trump, if you believe Corsi, I kinda think that Corsi got a pocket Pardon in advance.
 
Upchurch said:
How did he ever pass himself off as a populist?
Click to expand...

I've said multiple time that to fully "get" Trump you have to understand how he stood in front of a huge crowd, on live TV, in the state of Iowa, uttered the words "How dumb are the people of Iowa?" with that smug dumb ass smirk on his face, got a roaring ovation, and then went on to win Iowa in a landslide, being the first Republican since Reagan to win the state while Hillary said "Hey here's an idea, maybe we find jobs for you that AREN'T dying in a dark hole digging up rocks to burn?" and actually laid out a reasonable plan for that and was forced to politically backpeddle like she was facing a Dark Souls boss and needed to make space to drink an Eustis Flask at the negative response and still lost the "Blue Wall" because of it.

Trump had a skill that Hillary (and if we're being fair almost no Democrat) has, the ability to look 100 people in the eye, go "You are all worthless losers" and somehow put a coded message in there that makes it so every single one of those individual 100 people hears "Okay what I'm really saying is 90% of you are losers, 10% of you are awesome and my people, and you're one of the 10%"
 
As criminal charges pile up against Trump, his ego will implode and he will completely lose all mental competence. In his massive mentally confused state, he will mistake Mary Trump as his ex-wife and announce that she is his VP pick, running as the 'Trump-Trump' ticket.

Relishing her new celebrity status as VP candidate, Mary will masterfully win over the never-Trumpers and QAnon crowd, and ride a huge landslide victory over the continuously slumping Biden, who has at this point slid into full-blown dementia.

Upon innauguration, Mary will invoke the 25th amendment to remove Donald, who at this point is just a blathering mound of sludge.

Mary Trump will thus become 48th and first woman POTUS. :)
 
stanfr said:
As criminal charges pile up against Trump, his ego will implode and he will completely lose all mental competence. In his massive mentally confused state, he will mistake Mary Trump as his ex-wife and announce that she is his VP pick, running as the 'Trump-Trump' ticket.

Relishing her new celebrity status as VP candidate, Mary will masterfully win over the never-Trumpers and QAnon crowd, and ride a huge landslide victory over the continuously slumping Biden, who has at this point slid into full-blown dementia.

Upon innauguration, Mary will invoke the 25th amendment to remove Donald, who at this point is just a blathering mound of sludge.

Mary Trump will thus become 48th and first woman POTUS. :)
Click to expand...

:D Brilliant!
 
JoeMorgue said:
I've said multiple time that to fully "get" Trump you have to understand how he stood in front of a huge crowd, on live TV, in the state of Iowa, uttered the words "How dumb are the people of Iowa?" with that smug dumb ass smirk on his face, got a roaring ovation, and then went on to win Iowa in a landslide, being the first Republican since Reagan to win the state while Hillary said "Hey here's an idea, maybe we find jobs for you that AREN'T dying in a dark hole digging up rocks to burn?" and actually laid out a reasonable plan for that and was forced to politically backpeddle like she was facing a Dark Souls boss and needed to make space to drink an Eustis Flask at the negative response and still lost the "Blue Wall" because of it.

Trump had a skill that Hillary (and if we're being fair almost no Democrat) has, the ability to look 100 people in the eye, go "You are all worthless losers" and somehow put a coded message in there that makes it so every single one of those individual 100 people hears "Okay what I'm really saying is 90% of you are losers, 10% of you are awesome and my people, and you're one of the 10%"
Click to expand...

The trick was that he knew he had the backing of the GOP, and it didn't matter one iota what the worthless losers thought, he was already the winner. And the MAGAites were dumb enough to think their vote counted, that Donny really was going to save their stupid asses, so everything he did was "right" and OK with them.
 
I usually look at the other-rans as potential VP candidates, especially when there is little other reason for them to be running. Of the current crop, Tim Scott makes sense as a Trump VP
 
gabeygoat said:
I usually look at the other-rans as potential VP candidates, especially when there is little other reason for them to be running. Of the current crop, Tim Scott makes sense as a Trump VP
Click to expand...

Not if Scott says the election wasn't rigged/stolen, he won't.
 
Stacyhs said:
Not if Scott says the election wasn't rigged/stolen, he won't.
Click to expand...

But that's just it, Scott *will* say the election was rigged if he is in line to be picked. Trump doesn't care about past behavior, he is too wrapped up in his present ego to notice. Which is why he had no problem praising Tucker Carlson even though he knows full well Carlson despises him. Or hiring an attorney to defend him when the same attorney sided against him in the past. He doesn't care about genuine loyalty because he can't even comprehend that emotion. All he cares about is winning and his own image, so he will overlook anything Scott said so long as he sings his praises in public. Any of these wannabes will quickly change their tune when expedience demands it--think of people like Ted Cruz or Lyndsey Graham, they have no problem with being two-faced hypocrites--none of them do.
 
stanfr said:
But that's just it, Scott *will* say the election was rigged if he is in line to be picked. Trump doesn't care about past behavior, he is too wrapped up in his present ego to notice. Which is why he had no problem praising Tucker Carlson even though he knows full well Carlson despises him. Or hiring an attorney to defend him when the same attorney sided against him in the past. He doesn't care about genuine loyalty because he can't even comprehend that emotion. All he cares about is winning and his own image, so he will overlook anything Scott said so long as he sings his praises in public. Any of these wannabes will quickly change their tune when expedience demands it--think of people like Ted Cruz or Lyndsey Graham, they have no problem with being two-faced hypocrites--none of them do.
Click to expand...

I agree that most of them are two-faced hypocrites, but I will stand my ground on Trump never picking as his VP anyone who has publicly stated the election was not rigged/stolen.
 
I agree in part. Amended to show the difference:
Stacyhs said:
I agree that most of them are two-faced hypocrites, but I will stand my ground on Trump never picking as his VP anyone who has publicly stated the election was not rigged/stolen disagrees with Donny about anything when Donny asks him/her.
Click to expand...
 
Norman Alexander said:
I agree in part. Amended to show the difference:
Click to expand...

Yeah, exactly...i mean his own daughter basically said the election wasn't rigged, but if he asked her in a live setting and she told him he was delusional, he would discretely call someone up and have her fed live to wild dogs. :jaw-dropp
 
stanfr said:
But that's just it, Scott *will* say the election was rigged if he is in line to be picked. Trump doesn't care about past behavior, he is too wrapped up in his present ego to notice. Which is why he had no problem praising Tucker Carlson even though he knows full well Carlson despises him. Or hiring an attorney to defend him when the same attorney sided against him in the past. He doesn't care about genuine loyalty because he can't even comprehend that emotion. All he cares about is winning and his own image, so he will overlook anything Scott said so long as he sings his praises in public. Any of these wannabes will quickly change their tune when expedience demands it--think of people like Ted Cruz or Lyndsey Graham, they have no problem with being two-faced hypocrites--none of them do.
Click to expand...

There's one reason why Trump won't pick Scott; he's black. Trump's massive racism will perclude him from picking Scott, even if it's the only way for him to win. Trump may be persuaded to pick a woman, but never a person of colour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom