• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

South Tower 81st floor filled with thermite?

Not easy at all the get hold of I agree. That's my point. The perpetrators could not get hold of any black boxes, nor were they capable of programming black boxes with fake flight data and staged voice recordings etc. They did however get hold of a landing gear and a jet engine of the wrong type. That was much easier.

But the ycould insert 3d video fakery into every film of the events, plant all that Thermite without being seen and rig the towers to explode in the right places without being seen.
 
But the ycould insert 3d video fakery into every film of the events, plant all that Thermite without being seen and rig the towers to explode in the right places without being seen.

Not the 3D fakery in the amateur videos. That was done by others (those who were forced to do a cover-up). The perpetrators only needed to insert the crude 2D computer graphics silhouettes of an airplane in the live video feeds to the 5 major television networks. Sure, not exactly an easy task, but could perhaps be done by hijacking the video feeds at some centralized point(s) in the video signal chain.

The thermite could have been easy to rig. See: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6907331&postcount=1
 
Not the 3D fakery in the amateur videos. That was done by others (those who were forced to do a cover-up). The perpetrators only needed to insert the crude 2D computer graphics silhouettes of an airplane in the live video feeds to the 5 major television networks. Sure, not exactly an easy task, but could perhaps be done by hijacking the video feeds at some centralized point(s) in the video signal chain.

The thermite could have been easy to rig. See: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6907331&postcount=1

It must suck to be one of the only people in the world not in on the conspiracy
 
Not the 3D fakery in the amateur videos. That was done by others (those who were forced to do a cover-up). The perpetrators only needed to insert the crude 2D computer graphics silhouettes of an airplane in the live video feeds to the 5 major television networks. Sure, not exactly an easy task, but could perhaps be done by hijacking the video feeds at some centralized point(s) in the video signal chain.

The thermite could have been easy to rig. See: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6907331&postcount=1


How come all 911 kooks, always mention those they claim are the super villains behind 911 in such vague terms??

Name names, be very specific, who are "the perpetrators and who are "those forced to do a coverup"?
 
Not the 3D fakery in the amateur videos. That was done by others (those who were forced to do a cover-up). The perpetrators only needed to insert the crude 2D computer graphics silhouettes of an airplane in the live video feeds to the 5 major television networks. Sure, not exactly an easy task, but could perhaps be done by hijacking the video feeds at some centralized point(s) in the video signal chain.

The thermite could have been easy to rig. See: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6907331&postcount=1

Of course we know none of this happened because we know the planes were used. Your world view is very unsophisticated and your knowledge of these topics is inadequate making your suspicions and views unimportant.
 
So, don't you think the slap should have been taken apart and the fragments examined?

No, absolutely not.

Should we raise the Titanic and investigate that? How about the USS Arizona in Pearl Harbour?

No, absolutely not.

But, someone 'aught to slap that little dancing icon you have.
 
I have have watched a few videos where thermite was burned, and it burned slowly and melted the steel. Lots of thermite would easily have made floor 81 totally sag.

Bull ***** &*^& you have. Thermite doesn't do "SLOW" in ANY sense of the word. Not, here, not there, not anywhere.
 
How come all 911 kooks, always mention those they claim are the super villains behind 911 in such vague terms??

Name names, be very specific, who are "the perpetrators and who are "those forced to do a coverup"?

I have mentioned it several times before. For those who haven't read that, the perpetrators were a shadow group of people not connected to any particular organization, company or maybe even country. Those who were forced to do the cover-up has been a huge number of people in key positions and in positions of power in the government, media, academia etc.

The original perpetrators were a group of 'puppet masters' who carried out the planning and the recruitment of shadow contractors to carry out the implementation and execution phase.
 
Last edited:
Cool story, Anders.

Why isn't everybody asking you for evidence in just about every post? This is all fiction without evidence.
 
Cool story, Anders.

Why isn't everybody asking you for evidence in just about every post? This is all fiction without evidence.

I doubt that I can find any hard evidence on the Internet. Mostly videos and some conspiracy articles. I did find some inconsistencies in seismic data timing etc, but the response I have got from debunkers is basically "human error". :( Steven Jones papers on thermite could be interesting. I watched one of his presentations and it looked like pretty solid evidence for the use of thermite in the WTC towers.
 
I doubt that I can find any hard evidence on the Internet. Mostly videos and some conspiracy articles. I did find some inconsistencies in seismic data timing etc, but the response I have got from debunkers is basically "human error". :( Steven Jones papers on thermite could be interesting. I watched one of his presentations and it looked like pretty solid evidence for the use of thermite in the WTC towers.

Starting with the latter: No. S. Jones' papers on thermite contain the very data that proves it can't be thermite, but must be paint.

As for the rest: Without evidence, why construct such an enormously complicated theory full of technological unknowns that requires such large amounts of conspirators and risks?
Without evidence, anyone could invent any fiction. It is all vain.

19 terrorist taking planes and flying into buildings, after 4 of them took some flying lessons, is so simpler and much more elegant! Plus, it is consistent with all the evidence!
 
Will the U.S. government admit a cover-up? Maybe! But not yet. I watched a politician on CNN today talking about the 9/11 attacks and the fight against terrorism. So it looks like they still need the Al CIAda boogieman still for some time to come. Maybe after the problems in the Muslim countries that are going on have been solved they will no longer need the terrorist threat for political strategies.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom