BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
Particularly not with Somali pirates, who are likely to substantially out gun you.
We need to have AMCs.
Particularly not with Somali pirates, who are likely to substantially out gun you.
What a sad story. Apparently they knew it was dangerous but "thought it would be ok".
Still, in a decision that troubled friends and family members, the Quest had departed from a convoy of yachts that was assembled to ward off attacks by pirates in those waters — such maritime convoys are known as rallies — to go off on their own into some of the most dangerous waters in the world.
.I'm pretty pro-firearm (had a CCW when I was in Florida, couple of pistols, etc..) but even though my future plans/dreams include sailing around a bit, I don't plan on having a firearm on board. The problem with guns on board is that there are many many places that don't allow guns to be brought in/carried/stored on board, and these places are places you want to go when sailing. Sure, you can try to sneak it in... and risk incarceration and/or confiscation of your vessel if it's found. Easier solution is to look on Noonsite for where the pirate "danger zones" are... and DON'T GO THERE.
Don't be sorry - when I heard a US ship was following the slime and they were headed towards a particular Somali port, my first reaction was "Why aren't they bombing that port out of existance right now?" We know where they come from, we know where they are supported.........
Good.
Up-close and personal. I hope he blew blood-bubbles.
Sorry to sound vindictive.
I am, so that's the way it comes out.
Never missing a chance to plug our fine Dutch defence products:
The Goalkeeper.
Gunboat diplomacy minus the diplomacy.
or they where killed by the military in the botched rescue cause the military would never lie would they?
.Yes, let's assume the military is covering up a botched rescue without any evidence of said botched rescue. That is what we do here at JREF, we make baseless assumptions from personal biases.
Actually that's not so rare as your sarcasm implies, I'm afraid.Yes, let's assume the military is covering up a botched rescue without any evidence of said botched rescue. That is what we do here at JREF, we make baseless assumptions from personal biases.
Actually that's not so rare as your sarcasm implies, I'm afraid.
I am betting quite a few Seal Teams are deployed to the Indian Ocean as we speak.
.
These poor schlumpfs were missionaries.
Distributing bibles.
Doing the Lord's work.
Look at their reward.
or they where killed by the military in the botched rescue cause the military would never lie would they?
sourceKilling hostages "has now become part of our rules," said a pirate who identified himself as Muse Abdi....
From now on, anyone who tries to rescue the hostages in our hands will only collect dead bodies," he said. "It will never ever happen that hostages are rescued and we are hauled to prison.
They had a boat full of bibles and thought Jesus would protect them. Unfortuantely, Jesus apparently had other plans for them.They had apparently joined the rally specifically in order to go through these dangerous waters, but for some reason decided to go off on their own.![]()
Fish gotta eat too.I'll take three pleaseCan you imagine if one of those opened up on one of those little dinghys the pirates board the ships with? It wouldn't just destroy the ship and crew, but they would cease to exist in solid form. Awesome.
Exactly. If you just pay them per severed hand they could cheat, so you have to specify left or right hand. And you could probably get 2 or 3 scalps off a single head so that's a no-go, and heads themselves are too big and clunky.However they would have to be very careful about how and what the privateers are payed for.
