Merged Skeptics vs. Knowers/Believers

[leafman91]

I don't get it. What's the point of a bump?

 

[RoboTimbo]

Of course they do... it is just that the debunkers cannot support their claims with evidence - so irrationally resort to claiming they do not have to supply any!

This of course turns accepted notions of the burden of proof totally upside down and we enter a twilight zone of antilogic.

Moreover when the debunkers cite their Guru Sagan ("extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence") - they cannot actually define what "extraordinary evidence" is! If even THEY don't know what it is - then how can anyone supply it?

Any real evidentiary support for aliens then?

 

[Nonpareil]

Any real evidentiary support for aliens then?

Of course not.

 

[arthwollipot]

I don't get it. What's the point of a bump?

There is none. It's done purely for pleasure.

 

[RoboTimbo]

There is none. It's done purely for pleasure.

Wow, I must be doing it wrong.

 

[wollery]

There's nothing more pleasurable than a good bump.








What??

 

[Nonpareil]

Except a better bump.

 

[Toke]

Any aliens yet?

 

[Correa Neto]

What?
Someone is bumping an alien?

 

[Nonpareil]

What? Someone ISN'T bumping an alien?

 

[Correa Neto]

found no one to hold it still...

 

[Toke]

found no one to hold it still...

You gotta pick one of the small ones.

 

[RoboTimbo]

In answer to the OP, Rramjet is being spanked like a puppy who piddled on the carpet and KotA has fled his own thread after finally declaring that his belief is solely faith based.

 

[Marduk]

In answer to the OP, Rramjet is being spanked like a puppy who piddled on the carpet and KotA has fled his own thread after finally declaring that his belief is solely faith based.

bump

 

[Toke]

In answer to the OP, Rramjet is being spanked like a puppy who piddled on the carpet and KotA has fled his own thread after finally declaring that his belief is solely faith based.

I am not sure about the finally.
This look rather faith based to me.

KotA post #9 (some snipping)
I use the terms knowers and believers, because I believe they are in the same camp. 'I' fancy myself a "knower", and not merely a 'believer'. I KNOW that what I saw was beyond human capability. You can believe something 'might' be true, but you don't know until you have 'enough' evidence to reach that conclusion.

Now, knowing something, and being able to 'prove' it, are two VERY different things.

 

[Jocko]

I hate to break this to you Jocko, but KoTA's already left this thread. I'm assuming he isn't coming back. Most likely he has missed this post completely

I assure you he is still here. The man lurks like a case of herpes in remission. Count on it.

 

[Marduk]

I assure you he is still here. The man lurks like a case of herpes in remission. Count on it.

he hasn't logged on since friday, I notice that he rarely logs on during the weekend and quite frankly I would be very surprised if hes past college age
logging on at school perhaps

 

[RoboTimbo]

Rramjet is kicking the poo out of you guys in his thread, where he has presented mountains of evidence for u.f.o.'s being non-human craft.

He definitely has poo scattered about everywhere. Is Rramjet mad at you for leaving him alone with his "switch the burden of proof" thread and abandoning yours?

 

[Eyeron]

A zit is a bump.

 

[Correa Neto]

I have no doubt UFO believers may derive a different interpretation from that thread. Just like they do with evidence.

Oh, and BUMP!