Merged Skeptics vs. Knowers/Believers

Marcus said:
I am telling 'you', the reader here and now,that this is THE truth...There's evidence of it...'I' have seen it. And you will too, if you look for it.

I have seen the evidence of pinkness, but I'm sick & tired of doing other people's research, so you are required to go and find evidence of my conclusion.
Click to expand...

so someone left "my little pony" in your basement, and the light doesn't work

thats pretty mundane
;)
 
Marcus said:
I am telling 'you', the reader here and now,that this is THE truth...There's evidence of it...'I' have seen it. And you will too, if you look for it.

I have seen the evidence of pinkness, but I'm sick & tired of doing other people's research, so you are required to go and find evidence of my conclusion.
Click to expand...

Should I use the internet as a reliable resource?? lol
 
At my last post, I wrote about similarities between "objects" shown at a Mediaeval painting and the description of an UFO from the claimed Villas-Boas "Close Encounter of the 5th Kind" case. Well, since not everyone is supposed to sink in to UFO lore (yep, its funny but can be addictive) I decided to post a comparisson here. At the left, the alleged Mediaeval UFOs (anyone with a brief understanding of iconography will see something else); to the right, renderings based on Villas-Boas description.
wooooooooooo2.jpg
 
Correa Neto said:
At my last post, I wrote about similarities between "objects" shown at a Mediaeval painting and the description of an UFO from the claimed Villas-Boas "Close Encounter of the 5th Kind" case. Well, since not everyone is supposed to sink in to UFO lore (yep, its funny but can be addictive) I decided to post a comparisson here. At the left, the alleged Mediaeval UFOs (anyone with a brief understanding of iconography will see something else); to the right, renderings based on Villas-Boas description.
[qimg]http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d150/AVCN/wooooooooooo2.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Stay tuned for the "Great Debate Thread"!

Who is gonna argue against Ufo evidence as being attributed to non-human craft?
 
Just found an interesting site on the series of tubes. In 2002, a set of experimental archeologists set out to quarry a nine ton stone from one of the origanal puma punku quarries, the one farthest from the site, with the hardest stone, build a reed boat, transport the stone across lake titicaca, drag it up to the puma punku site, carve it into an exact replica of one of the stones there, and put it in place of that stone so the original could go to a museum. It was all done with primitive tools and hand labor, and went quicker and smoother than they expected. Consider this myth BUSTED!

http://www.reedboat.org/

A
 
Andrew Wiggin said:
Just found an interesting site on the series of tubes. In 2002, a set of experimental archeologists set out to quarry a nine ton stone from one of the origanal puma punku quarries, the one farthest from the site, with the hardest stone, build a reed boat, transport the stone across lake titicaca, drag it up to the puma punku site, carve it into an exact replica of one of the stones there, and put it in place of that stone so the original could go to a museum. It was all done with primitive tools and hand labor, and went quicker and smoother than they expected. Consider this myth BUSTED!

http://www.reedboat.org/

A
Click to expand...

Thank you. Now that King of the America's demand that it be demonstrated has been fulfilled, perhaps he will move on with his life. Perhaps we can too, though it will be a struggle to shake off the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder we will all undoubtedly suffer from exposure to him and his counterpart, Rramjet.
 
The complete lack of interest and or respect to the notion of a "Debate" occurring says a lot about those unwilling to support it...

And it is perfectly clear why.

Rramjet is kicking the poo out of you guys in his thread, where he has presented mountains of evidence for u.f.o.'s being non-human craft.

In a scientific lab he may be lacking in repeatable "proof", but he wins in any public debate. And the skeptics know this, and thus the reason NONE have given this any serious consideration.

Why am I NOT surprised?
 
King of the Americas said:
The complete lack of interest and or respect to the notion of a "Debate" occurring says a lot about those unwilling to support it...

And it is perfectly clear why.

Rramjet is kicking the poo out of you guys in his thread,
Click to expand...

PFAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

*gasps for air*

No. Rramjet's argument is a mess of logical fallacies and barefaced lying.

where he has presented mountains of evidence for u.f.o.'s being non-human craft.
Click to expand...

1) No, he hasn't. Nothing he has offered is acceptable as evidence.
2) He refuses to even admit that he's trying to prove that the crafts are of non-human origin.

In a scientific lab he may be lacking in repeatable "proof", but he wins in any public debate.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, public debate does not determine objective truth. Opinion is not fact. Rramjet can present all the anecdotal evidence and bare assertions that he wants. Until he gives us some actual hard evidence, rather than second-and-third-hand accounts, he remains defeated.

And the skeptics know this, and thus the reason NONE have given this any serious consideration.
Click to expand...

Uh, no, we don't give him any serious consideration because so far he hasn't given us a reason to.

Why am I NOT surprised?
Click to expand...

You shouldn't be, seeing as the two of you are doing almost exactly the same thing, and as such can expect similar results.
 
I would love to see the PMs between you and Rramjet about you both starting threads where you try to turn the tables on the skeptics with the burden of proof. You folded pretty quickly but I have to hand it to Rramjet, he's stuck it out like a brave little soldier, even though he really messed up by stating his extraordinary assertion and then backing off of it later.

He's just being played with like a cat toy now.
 
Oh my lord. Once again, I thought you stopped talking. You replying to this thread gives me headaches.

King of the Americas said:
The complete lack of interest and or respect to the notion of a "Debate" occurring says a lot about those unwilling to support it...
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, I think theres a reason we stopped debating...hmm...

King of the Americas said:
That 'we' are not the first intelligent species to 'arise' from planet Earth. *I do NOT have 'proof' of this, so don't bother asking.
Click to expand...

Then you failed the challenge of debate. Your eyes hold no weight as proof, there for you have lost this argument.

PLEASE don't respond further... I want this thread to die.
Click to expand...

Of course you do!! You don't want your failure to keep following you. Too bad people are going to post anyways =P.

I don't want to think about this/worry about responding to each and every comment made under my name...ANYMORE...
Click to expand...

Then don't. Go to a different thread.

...but it's over for me. 'I' am done.
Click to expand...

Then for the love of GOD, go away!!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom