• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Skeptics For 911 Truth

scooby said:
I'm sorry you'll have to do better than that, it's got more woo than you can shake a stick at. It's riddled with it.

Come on, don't make me skeptical.
Click to expand...

Ok...enough 20 questions liar...what's your problem with the statement. Spill the beans or simply STFU. You adolescent liars are running a muck today. Either say what you have to say or just go away. We're not here to babysit pimple-faced pseudo detectives...who jump on the internet between the "schools out" bell and the time your mama comes home from work...mmmmkay.

Let's either have a discussion....or you just fade away.

Looking forward to something other than your ridiculous crap.
 
OMGturt1es said:
at the risk of becoming unpopular, i think gorgoroth is over rated.

there. i said it. i'll remove my kvlt badge.
Click to expand...

No, your 100% correct, they are completely overrated.
For real black metal :) go for 'Bestial Warlust' and the album 'Vengeance war till death'

I have spoken.
 
pagan said:
C'mon are you guys already losing your faith?

In "Dubya and the holy goat" and "Ali baba Osama and the 19 hijackers"

I know these stories are sacred for you guys. You BELIEVE in them.

We sceptics on the other do not believe in them. It takes too much gullibility for that for our rational and sceptical minds. In short we don't have the stomach.

A slogan? What about a country choir singing "Stand by your Bush"?
Click to expand...

9/11 Dolts; if we had facts we would have jobs
Nuts and Dolts of 9/11 Stories of Fiction; meeting continously at LCF

We could have truthful names is we had facts; 9/11 GIFT (grand idiots for truth)

It would be hard to have a truthful name for the liars of 9/11, the so called truth movement. Sad fact.
 
Last edited:
pagan said:
Our debunking activities of this official theory has resulted in the conclusion that it is false on many accounts. So we have strong suspicions that it was an inside job.
But, we don't have any proofs who did it. To determine that we need further investigations.
Click to expand...

After years of investigating all you have are "suspicions?"

You admit to having no proof of who did it?

No wonder you twoofers can't agree on anything.

BTW - who should conduct a new investigation?
 
no scoob, not at all. Im saying grow up. Speak your mind, I am speaking mine on the matter.
 
hellaeon said:
no scoob, not at all. Im saying grow up. Speak your mind, I am speaking mine on the matter.
Click to expand...

Ah shame, it was making me laugh.

Yeah you'll have to bear with me speaking my mind slowly, I seem to have a lot of people to talk to - none of them interested. I see a lot of this, it reminds me of borrowed onus, but I think it's safe to say it's something else. I've already got a backlog, plus what I was going to say.
 
CurtC said:
FREE HAT !!!
Click to expand...

Is there a JREF hat?
I know the Pilots for truth were selling BBQ aprons. Maybe the Skeptics for truth could sell pocket protectors or those cool clip things so you can hang your keys off your belt loops.

And don't be offended Scooby, but I think people don't like having to play guessing games and just say "put up or STFU" out of frustration. Nothing to do with your freedom of speach being infringed.
 
scooby said:
Ah shame, it was making me laugh.

Yeah you'll have to bear with me speaking my mind slowly, I seem to have a lot of people to talk to - none of them interested. I see a lot of this, it reminds me of borrowed onus, but I think it's safe to say it's something else. I've already got a backlog, plus what I was going to say.
Click to expand...
That's some predicament, scooby!

Some tricks to avoid it:
  1. Don't play silly games. Just write what you have to say.
  2. Only post claims you can substantiate. Post the evidence with the claim. That way you won't be pestered by mean skeptics asking for evidence.
  3. Don't accuse people of crimes unless you have evidence. Post the evidence with the claim. That way you won't be pestered by angry skeptics asking for evidence.
Believe me, it works!
You won't have a backlog if you keep to these simple rules.
 
pagan said:
Huh? You are the conspiracy theorist. You believe in the Bush adm. conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...
In a very limited sense, this is true; the conspiracy of 19 hijackers, et al.

However, what you don't seem to understand is that this conspiracy essentially ended on 9/11. It's no longer a theory. Your conspiracy requires that the perpetrators uphold it indefinitely.

In addition to the resources needed for the alleged operation, the subsequent cover-up also requires resources: money, man-hours, etc. The number of people involved in the alleged cover-up will only increase with the passage of time. The same people can not realistically push the cover-up indefinitely.
 
Redtail said:
MORE PEOPLE WILL COME IF YOU HAVE PUNCH AND PIE!!!!!
Click to expand...

1154841L.jpg


stilicho said:
(snip)
<insert sound of crickets chirping here>
Click to expand...
Feel free to use this:
619745a54bbe44f13.gif
 
scooby said:
I'm sorry you'll have to do better than that, it's got more woo than you can shake a stick at. It's riddled with it.

Come on, don't make me skeptical.
Click to expand...

I'd certainly like to know what you found to be "woo" in my statement. Since I cannot see it for myself, please explain it.
 
Loss Leader said:
I'd certainly like to know what you found to be "woo" in my statement. Since I cannot see it for myself, please explain it.
Click to expand...

It doesn't surprise me that you cannot see it - there are none so blind as those too fond of their own voice. I made that one up on the fly, what do you think? To be honest, I was going to give it a day or two to give you time to quietly leave the board in shame, they seem pretty ruthless in here if you don't cut it. But I've got a few points to address from earlier in the thread, I'll go back through those before we catch up on this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom