sinnikal
Muse
You brought the subject up.
Skepticism and The Normal
- Thread starter WWHP
- Start date
Professor Yaffle
Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
My son has gastroenterisis (has had it for a week), so since I have been spending my days dealing with ***** and vomit anyway....
no. our perception of reality is comprised of those three components, it just appears to us as the universe.
Now when you can address the discussion critically, let me know. til then, the more you post silly things, the more people here will like you, so get on with yourself, girl.....u rock!
hehe, I actually missed that pun! If I didnt hate that drug violently, I would have found your musing funny.
so why are you here discussing with me and not somewhere else? for what purpose? you think it's bullsh*t, what I write, right? I mean, I would never waste my time reading someone who I thought was writing BS. I mean, timecube.com is funny, but i wouldnt spend more than 5 minutes on it. I left your forum. So Why continue? Arnt there more interesting exchanges with other trolls? Surely you have some other quacks to find, right? Isnt that what i am to you, a quack?
oh, so i'm to blame then, not doc lo or anybody, is that what your saying? it's my fault because I suggested that there are scientists who DO study things like 'woo woo' healing?
Mojo
Mostly harmless
You are attempting to rely on an appeal to authority. Assessment of the validity of an experiment must be on the basis of the experiment itself, not on the reputations of those carrying it out.
STILL trolling, are you, Mr Fish?
Folks - we have here either (1) a nutter, (2) a troll, or (3) a nutty troll.
In the cases (1) and (3), you will not get sensible responses, or sensible anything for that matter, out of him. So if you have anything better to do with your life (even rearranging your sock drawer), leave him alone and do that.
In cases (2) or (3), we have a set routine for dealing with trolls. We leave them alone to die of boredom.
Either way, it's obvious no-one of any sensibility will get any value out of this encounter. I suggest talking with Edge on the other thread - he's actually making more coherent sence than...whatshisname?...here.
Folks - we have here either (1) a nutter, (2) a troll, or (3) a nutty troll.
In the cases (1) and (3), you will not get sensible responses, or sensible anything for that matter, out of him. So if you have anything better to do with your life (even rearranging your sock drawer), leave him alone and do that.
In cases (2) or (3), we have a set routine for dealing with trolls. We leave them alone to die of boredom.
Either way, it's obvious no-one of any sensibility will get any value out of this encounter. I suggest talking with Edge on the other thread - he's actually making more coherent sence than...whatshisname?...here.
Professor Yaffle
Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
I'll admit it, I have a fatal fascination for arguing with idiots. What of it?
And we're off to a good start.
What about the other statements?
In case you've forgotten already:
I like ice cream.
I like shrimps
I live in the US
I live in Canada
Humanoids who considered me an alien implanted metal objects into my body.
A great example of this would be Dr Lo and his little sucker Bubblefish, wouldn't it?
Last edited:
sinnikal
Muse
Nah, that'd be a mystery.
agreed, and you DONT know how the experiment was carried out, and THEY do. You just SAW the video, and they were IN the video. see the difference?
Tell me, if we agree that the doc doesnt reveal the steps taken by the researchers, how can you possibly know the experiment was faulty?
And please don't bring up that 'cuz it's not double blinded, nah nah nah' argument. That's just you repeating something you heard someone else say.
I mean, mojo, are YOU a researcher? what do you do? what is your knowledge and experience to be able to determine that 5 credited scientists are morons and frauds, hmm?
I'm waiting with baited breath
BF
but that's dishonest, because you're arguing like an idiot, you're not really arguing, your flaming and calling me names.
That's what I mean, it would take less time to have a reasonable discussion. And since you know I am a layman, and I claim to only be interested in truth, why insult me when you could educate me?
What am I doing that is so bad? So I am developing a framework for online discussion forums that could produce a win win. What's wrong with that even if I fail? Wouln't you rather want to help someone achieve such a thing than fail at such a thing? What am I pushing that is so offensive? i really dont get it, tell me.
sinnikal
Muse
Why not? It wasn't double-blinded, that could be seen from the vid, and that's what was faulty with the experiment. Do you still not understand the significance of this oversight to the possibility of extracting any information from the 'experiment'?
Mojo
Mostly harmless
Again, you are making an appeal to authority.
I have not said that they are "morons and frauds"; I have said that they have carried out what looks, from the available evidence, to be a poorly designed experiment, and have not published their results properly. If you think that this makes them "morons and frauds", then that is a matter for you.
If they are prepared to submit a report of the experiment in a form in which it can properly studied, there might be something to discuss. As it is we cannot draw any conclusions from the experiment.