Skeptic4Sure's Gravy Debunking Thread!

[Skeptic4Sure]

That's okay. I just thought I'd prompt you since you brought it up and you seem to have an awful lot of free time on your hands, as shown by your posts on this forum. I'll be around whenever you're ready.

Rather than "sitting on" your evidence, why not release it? The pressure must make you feel uncomfortable. Or are you like that songstress in the old blues tune:

If I can't sell it
I'll keep sittin' on it
Before I give it away...

It's OK Bobby,

I know you're nervous. When you're ready to provide the videogoogle link and not some plug for your PDF, I'll give it a whirl.

When I'm done sitting on it, you can have at it...it will be nice and warm.

 

[The Almond]

I'm sitting on some very explosive information, and you think I want to get sidetracked with some silly debate with this guy?

Except you very explicitly challenged him to a debate. See first post of this thread.

So for you make a whole separate thread for me, is flattering. And of course very egotistical of you, in an impetuous sort of way.

I think ego is proclaiming the importance of scientific evidence before releasing it. I think ego is lauding your own work before others have a chance to see it.

I told you we'll get to it when we get to it.

Actually, you said you knew immediatly what you would have responded to. It really shouldn't take you long to write your thoughts down, right?

I am tempted to not let your "victory by forfeit" tactic slide by.

As you should be. A person with significant knowledge and experience in the matter has challenged you to debate him on specific points in his analysis. He has provided you with an entire transcript of the debate as well as links to his writings. Meanwhile, you declared victory over him as a direct result of evidence you deem substantial, but no one has been able to verify.

 

[stateofgrace]

I'm sitting on some very explosive information, and you think I want to get sidetracked with some silly debate with this guy? I would love to spend all the time I could, but at this point, I simply can't.

So for you make a whole separate thread for me, is flattering. And of course very egotistical of you, in an impetuous sort of way.

I told you we'll get to it when we get to it.

I am tempted to not let your "victory by forfeit" tactic slide by.

Ok I will ask nicely. Any chance you could share it with this forum, so people here could see what you are talking?

Oh I forgot, please.

 

[scissorhands]

I'm sitting on some very explosive information

Then why wait?
Its not to make yourself appear important and in "the know" is it?
Given the subject matter I cant understand how anybody would play games like this.
Are you a sociopath?

 

[Gravy]

It's OK Bobby,

I know you're nervous. When you're ready to provide the videogoogle link and not some plug for your PDF, I'll give it a whirl.

When I'm done sitting on it, you can have at it...it will be nice and warm.

The link, with transcript, is in that paper, in the Alex Jones section, which you can find by using the table of contents, the index, or your pdf or doc reader's search function. I suggest that you also read the paper. You may learn a lot.

Out of curiosity, do you, like Alex Jones, believe the FDNY was involved in "demolishing" WTC 7?

 

[Pardalis]

When I'm done sitting on it, you can have at it...it will be nice and warm.

Something wrong with your peristaltis?

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

Out of curiosity, do you, like Alex Jones, believe the FDNY was involved in "demolishing" WTC 7?

Of course not.

 

[hellaeon]

S4S you are such a 'dribbly'. Thats a polite word for another type of person unfortunate with dice result dealt by nature. Are you in the USA? isnt it coming up to winter now? Go hibernate.

S4S = DJ Legacy

 

[Bronze Dog]

Oh, well. I'm sure he'll release his evidence...

...pretty soon.

 

[Gravy]

Oh, well. I'm sure he'll release his evidence...

...pretty soon.

That's a great page.

 

[Pardalis]

Something wrong with your peristaltis?

Not only are we constantly bukkaked with stupid, now we're going to be enemaed with evidence?

 

[Peephole]

I'm sitting on some very explosive information,

When can we expect this explosion? I'd like to know so I can get my put options in place.

 

[Belz...]

I'm sitting on some very explosive information, and you think I want to get sidetracked with some silly debate with this guy? I would love to spend all the time I could, but at this point, I simply can't.

"Well if you don't know I'm not going to tell you."

Child.

 

[JFM]

I'm sitting on some very explosive information, and you think I want to get sidetracked with some silly debate with this guy? I would love to spend all the time I could, but at this point, I simply can't.

So for you make a whole separate thread for me, is flattering. And of course very egotistical of you, in an impetuous sort of way.

I told you we'll get to it when we get to it.

I am tempted to not let your "victory by forfeit" tactic slide by.

The ego has landed.

 

[stateofgrace]

When can we expect this explosion? I'd like to know so I can get my put options in place.

It will be something alone these lines

" The US government......bla, bla, bla......black box......bla,bla,bla.......lamp posts......bla,bla,bla.......everybody is lying or asleep..........bla,bla,bla........inside job. The End"

 

[fuelair]

I wonder if "evidence" in the CTist language means the same thing as "clue" in the skeptical language...

"I have here a list of Communists and Communist sympathizers working for the State Department......" Sen. Joseph McCarthy, A.H.

 

[chipmunk stew]

When you're ready to provide the videogoogle link and not some plug for your PDF, I'll give it a whirl.

Okay, give it a whirl:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8820426888499996890#26m19s

 

[aggle-rithm]

Not only are we constantly bukkaked with stupid, now we're going to be enemaed with evidence?

Not to mention catheterized with craziness.

 

[aggle-rithm]

It's OK Bobby,

I know you're nervous. When you're ready to provide the videogoogle link and not some plug for your PDF, I'll give it a whirl.

When I'm done sitting on it, you can have at it...it will be nice and warm.

Either you DON'T have the evidence and you're being a troll, or you DO have the evidence and you're obstructing justice. Which is it?

 

[JFM]

Okay, give it a whirl:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8820426888499996890#26m19s

Dear me. What a rabble.