Skeptic4Sure's Gravy Debunking Thread!

Does this remind anybody else of Alex Jones? "Oh, we have total evidence... Massive evidence..."

Funny how they love to build up to things that never come. You'd think they'd have been able to figure it out in the intervening five years. I mean, I never heard of anyone who was held back that many times!
I am reminded of a man waving a sheaf of papers, exclaiming "I have names!"

DR
 
Just joined in this thread.
The presumed troll's evidence:
A world of crickets.
 
The "world of crickets" is actually a person who is busy with something much more important that Gravy has to wait.

In the meanwhile, can somebody please post the Alex Jones ground zero debate/yelling match?
 
The "world of crickets" is actually a person who is busy with something much more important that Gravy has to wait.
Your busy schedule hasn't prevented you from posting nonsense ad nauseum in the other thread, has it? In the time you've taken to say that you knew what you would tell me, and then to twice ask where the Alex Jones encounter actually is, you could have simply stated your case. You haven't done so because you're a coward. Prove me wrong.

In the meanwhile, can somebody please post the Alex Jones ground zero debate/yelling match?
As I told you in the other thread, it's in the document that's linked in my signature.
 
Last edited:
Boy, these CTists all sound alike.

Skeptic4Sure sounds like Pdoherty now...:hypnotize

No, they are just both attention freaks. This one, is that one dood, from LC.
He is being harassed by the MIB over this, he claims! Started a thread about it an everything. Funny folks! Gotta laugh loud...
 
I'm sitting on some very explosive information, and you think I want to get sidetracked with some silly debate with this guy? I would love to spend all the time I could, but at this point, I simply can't.

So for you make a whole separate thread for me, is flattering. And of course very egotistical of you, in an impetuous sort of way.

I told you we'll get to it when we get to it.

I am tempted to not let your "victory by forfeit" tactic slide by.
 
I'm sitting on some very explosive information, and you think I want to get sidetracked with some silly debate with this guy? I would love to spend all the time I could, but at this point, I simply can't.

So for you make a whole separate thread for me, is flattering. And of course very egotistical of you, in an impetuous sort of way.

I told you we'll get to it when we get to it.

I am tempted to not let your "victory by forfeit" tactic slide by.
That's okay. I just thought I'd prompt you since you brought it up and you seem to have an awful lot of free time on your hands, as shown by your posts on this forum. I'll be around whenever you're ready.

Rather than "sitting on" your evidence, why not release it? The pressure must make you feel uncomfortable. Or are you like that songstress in the old blues tune:

If I can't sell it
I'll keep sittin' on it
Before I give it away...
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom