• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Sir David Attenborough Finds Yeti Evidence Convincing

Yes, good point. I chocolate Wednesday finger manager it kiwi.

(Don't forget the Malaysians, Australians, etc.)

(So where exactly do you and Parcher manage to insert your finger and have it come out chocolatey, kiwi?)

Are you proposing that Malay and Australia have bigfeet? I haven't seen one single poster at JREF supporting either. If you're attempting to include those as bigfoot in these discussions then it would be fair to group bigfoot skeptics in the same group with GW denialists.
 
Last edited:
(So where exactly do you and Parcher manage to insert your finger and have it come out chocolatey, kiwi?)

Are you proposing that Malay and Australia have bigfeet? I haven't seen one single poster at JREF supporting either. If you're attempting to include those as bigfoot in these discussions then it would be fair to group bigfoot skeptics in the same group with GW denialists.

Would that be the group with a clue? Bigfoot is one thing, but the global warming scam actually affects each and every one of us. I'll gladly become a full-fledged bigfoot supporter if it means the global warming scam goes away.
 
There was a trackway. But those look different than the individual track. Also, you get the opportunity to pick 4 or 5 toes.

I thought there was a trackway, but the article implied there was only one photograph of one footprint. I can see why though, because the trackway looks like it was left by hooves, imho.
 
(So where exactly do you and Parcher manage to insert your finger and have it come out chocolatey, kiwi?)

Are you proposing that Malay and Australia have bigfeet? I haven't seen one single poster at JREF supporting either. If you're attempting to include those as bigfoot in these discussions then it would be fair to group bigfoot skeptics in the same group with GW denialists.

Crack kills, dude. Yes. I, kitakaze, am personally claiming that Bigfoot exists in Malaysia and Australia. It is beyond possibility that I was talking about Malaysians and Australians claiming they have Bigfoot.:rolleyes:

Malaysian Bigfoot claims:



Australian Bigfoot claims:

 
No. But I remember the instance of those east coast climbers who tried to day hike Mt. Hood midwinter.

Quite right. I was mistaken. My apologies. I had mixed remembering you discussing plane crashes and those climbers.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3029091&postcount=7880

Point being was that you were speculating Bigfoot attacking people that would be insane for a Bigfoot to be.

My debunk of Bigfoot having anything to do with the tragic climber deaths on Mt. Hood:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3030692&postcount=7899
 
Last edited:
Um, guys? This thread is about Sir David Attenborough and the Yeti. Could you hold these clearly ongoing discussions about bigfoot somewhere else? It's not as if there aren't enough bigfoot threads already.
 
As I type this six of the first ten threads in this forum are about Big Foot. Now here's one about Yeti, prompted by a throwaway remark on a chat show.

Am I the only regular reader of this forum who does not give a toss whether Big Foot exists or not, and has trouble seeing the relevance of the subject to a forum about the paranormal? If not, can I ask - nay beg - the mods to create a subforum for the subject of mythical monsters, where those who do care (for God knows what reason) can discuss them to their hearts' content without bothering the rest of us?

Here's where that belongs:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133161
 
(So where exactly do you and Parcher manage to insert your finger and have it come out chocolatey, kiwi?)

Are you proposing that Malay and Australia have bigfeet? I haven't seen one single poster at JREF supporting either. If you're attempting to include those as bigfoot in these discussions then it would be fair to group bigfoot skeptics in the same group with GW denialists.

You've never heard of Bunyips or Yowies?
 
Why would there be only one footprint?


128806276290053714.jpg
 
To give some idea of how seriously this story is being treated, at least in the UK, none of what used to be called the broadsheets seems to have reported it all, although all have had stories mentioning David Attenborough in the last few days.
 
To give some idea of how seriously this story is being treated, at least in the UK, none of what used to be called the broadsheets seems to have reported it all, although all have had stories mentioning David Attenborough in the last few days.

Yet another sign of the vast international conspiracy to suppress the Boss of the Woods.
 
Thanks, WP. Pretty cut and dry. Smart guy who doesn't have all the information or gave it proper thought.

Bigfoot enthusiasts will go at this like a four year old on a pile of brownies.

Yeah, right.

The BFF thread has all of six posts in it, against JREF's 74.

Who are the four-year olds?
 
Regarding that footprint photo in the opening post, does anyone know if the photographer took a picture of any related footprints? Was it an isolated imprint? It would be a lot more convincing if it was just one in a series of prints. Maybe they could have followed them.
 
Thanks for reposting the image, William. Sorry, I should have looked at the whole thread. That's quite an image though. At the risk of ignoring additional posts in the thread, what's the consensus on what made the track?
 
Don't forget Cryptomundo. BFF is not the only place to find Bigfoot enthusiasts.

Yep, there are 10 posts on the subject there, which gives two forums dedicated to unknown beats a total of 16 posts against this one sceptical forum's 74.

Which one are all the zealots at?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom