LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
Yeah, we have examples to compare, so we don't need a cougar body. We have known cougar tracks, hair, dna, and scat.
Yeah, we have examples to compare, so we don't need a cougar body. We have known cougar tracks, hair, dna, and scat.
A photo like this would suffice to show a cougar, whether it is a wild cougar or a released captive would probably take a DNA sample. Scientists find scat and things when they know a creature is around.
http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/photogallery/mammals/
That isn't Ohio. John, cougar hoaxers are as common as Bigfoot hoaxers. Wake up!
Cougars in Virginia
Endangered Species of Virginia
Doesn't say they don't exist. A simple search yields Virginia Cougar info.
Well, if you accept what someone says, and need no further evidence, then sure, that's a cougar in Ohio.
Does the whole pic help you out?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_7934c753f4c365f3.jpg[/qimg]
Questions:
1. Cougars are a real scientifically documented animal correct?
2. If your answer is yes. then how is it you believe that they could not exist in Ohio, PA, West Virginia or Virginia even if transplanted or imported from other areas? Your opinion is that this is impossible?
Questions:
1. Cougars are a real scientifically documented animal correct?
2. If your answer is yes. then how is it you believe that they could not exist in Ohio, PA, West Virginia or Virginia even if transplanted or imported from other areas? Your opinion is that this is impossible?
Yeah, we have examples to compare, so we don't need a cougar body. We have known cougar tracks, hair, dna, and scat.
I'm just trying to help you. I have no problem with cougars whatsoever.
I have a problem with claims and evidence, or lack thereof.
Most of us regulars here did not just get off the bus from Skeptic School.
Chimps and gorillas and other apes and monkeys get shot and killed all the time. It seems logical to me that some hunter would have shot a bigfoot by now.But you don't deny it. The truth may be politically incorrect, but it must be brought up in defense of inaccurate comparisons. Like my point in the "why no bigfoot roadkill" thread. I asked for the number of other apes roadkilled in their native habitat. All I got was obfuscation.
It's a valid point. Considering that the prefered method of hunting bigfoot is banging trees with a stick and packing an audio recorder. While pistol hunting from their car. On the outskirts of some yahoo town.
This thread was about Bigfoot evidence and I was jumped on about mentioning a COUGAR sighting. A sighting of a real scientifically documented animal, regardless of it being not documented to exist in a particular area in years. What was basically being insinuated is that ALL THINGS and EVERYONE involved in investigating the Bigfoot phenomenon are liars, fools or hoaxers.
So why even continue this conversation?