Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
there is no point in getting into tracks SINCE MANY OF THEM SIMPLY VANISH OR DISAPPEAR suddenly with no good reason
Click to expand...

Isn't that also a sign that the tracks are fake? Tracks that just start and end abruptly, I mean. A good faker will begin and end near some ground that doesn't hold tracks well, to conceal the fact that there aren't actually any more tracks at all. That's what I would do.

A person who hasn't thought things through, will begin and end the tracks incorrectly, thus making it appear that bigfoot has use of a Federation transporter.

Patty didn't come from anywhere, for instance, and P and G initially claimed to have followed her for 3.5 miles until that story became untenable. So, Patty doesn't appear to have gone anywhere, either.
 
From The Locals:

Years later, I crossed paths with Krantz in January of 2001 during
a conference on the Skookum Cast (Chapter 6). I asked him about the
characteristics of track casts which he used to separate the genuine
ones from the fakes. It turns out that one was the "dermal ridges" or
fingerprint-like lines that swirl around the hands and feet of all primates,
but which are found only on primates. If the earth or mud that
contains a bigfoot track is fine enough, the fingerprint-like dermal
ridges will be faithfully preserved in the plaster cast. The dermal
ridges will not make tightly curving swirls such as the ones seen on
our fingerprints. On tracks that appear to be genuine, the dermal
ridges can be expected to make coarse, widely curving patterns that
encircle the margins of the entire foot. Then there are the “Krantz
Three,” which Joe Beelart and Larry Lund found mention of in an old
letter that Krantz wrote to Rene Dahinden: A two-section foot, square
toes, and a straight line across toe ends.
Click to expand...

Krantz appears to have really fallen hard for the fakes along with no knowledge of casting artifacts.

Patty's perfectfoot wouldn't conform, but her blockfoot probably would!
 
Last edited:
More Krantzisms from The Locals:

Krantz explained how casts of bigfoot
tracks suggested a foot anatomy that made sense for an animal that
was much heavier than we were. A larger footprint from a taller and
heavier animal would have a different metatarsal hinge or “ball” of
the foot, maybe even two "balls" in the foot just behind the toes. Sure
enough, the track cast he had seemed to show two balls in the foot.
They also seemed to show a foot that had an ankle that was not in a vertical line with
the heel as in our human foot. A much heavier creature would
have an ankle that was closer to the center of the foot. The
track casts he held seemed to show evidence that they were made by
a foot whose ankle was more distant from, and forward of the heel.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
This book is great!

Fahrenbach own words serve to summarize the situation nicely:

To help with field identification, look for the following: The
hair has no medulla; it seems to have always a reddish cast
under the microscope, even if it looks very dark in the hand;
its contained pigment is very fine grained; its diameter falls
in the range of 50-90 microns; it is essentially indistinguishable
from human hair (however, I have 15 separate samples
with these characteristics, a quantity unlikely to have been
collected by pure chance from human sources).
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
This is what happens when you try and make a joke about Bigfoot.

Drew said:
I am thinking about adding a thread regarding possible Gluten allergies in Bigfoot however.
Click to expand...

Flashman said:
This reads like sarcasm, however, there is plenty of reason to believe that Sasquatch may not tolerate gluten very well, due to researches into early man's development of agriculture showing that cultivation of grains was limited as much by humans developing gluten tolerance and ability to use it productively in the body as by their ability to achieve respectable harvests. I seem to remember we touched on this somewhere, though not sure whether it was in a thread leaning more toward paleo-anthropology or more focussed on Sas. I'm thinking also that primitive grains had lower gluten contents than the highly hybridised wheat we now grow. We evolved the grains as we evolved to be able to deal with it. So it's highly likely that Sasquatch would get a stomach ache from large amounts of anything made with bread flour or durum wheat flour i.e. high gluten content. If the pancakes were prepared with a starchier, less gluteny cake and pastry flour then they might be tolerated better by a digestive system unused to modern grains.
Click to expand...
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=21019&view=findpost&p=423872
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6 said:
Isn't that also a sign that the tracks are fake? Tracks that just start and end abruptly, I mean. A good faker will begin and end near some ground that doesn't hold tracks well, to conceal the fact that there aren't actually any more tracks at all. That's what I would do.

A person who hasn't thought things through, will begin and end the tracks incorrectly, thus making it appear that bigfoot has use of a Federation transporter.

Patty didn't come from anywhere, for instance, and P and G initially claimed to have followed her for 3.5 miles until that story became untenable. So, Patty doesn't appear to have gone anywhere, either.
Click to expand...


STOP THIS NONSENSE! Tracks that end with no good reason, are usually in
MUD OR SNOW.

There is NO chance for side-walking and hoaxing...

all marks on left or right WILL SHOW UP.

(Gads there must be a minimum IQ to post here -- what? 75? )

El Monstro
 
AtomicMysteryMonster said:
I agree that most people wouldn't think of that possibility, but this guy says that it could be possible. I think the only way that'll be confirmed is if a trailcam films a bear leaving tracks like this.

I forgot where I saw this, but I seem to recall reading somewhere that when bears walk (run?) a certain way on all fours, their tracks can seem like those of a bipedal animal.



That could be the case. I wouldn't put anything past a known hoaxer like Freeman.
Click to expand...

reply: more foolishness by a non-woodsman.

Only one set in 100 bear tracks shows an overlap.

So stop this now.

el m.
 
Basic fallacy:

You are not HEAVY enough to make a bigfoot track.

Takes tons, not mere pounds.

Bonk!
Click to expand...

We've been through that already.
You are wrong, monstjord.

Bonk!

STOP THIS NONSENSE! Tracks that end with no good reason, are usually in
MUD OR SNOW.

There is NO chance for side-walking and hoaxing...

all marks on left or right WILL SHOW UP.
Click to expand...

Been through that already too.

Wrong again, Beckstro!

Bonk!
 
A general note about sock puppets. Please do not accuse people openly in the forum of being sock puppets. All it does is cause bickering and derails, as can clearly be seen here. Use the report function to alert the admins to anyone you feel is a sock, explaining who you think they are, and why.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom