Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I talked to John about what he did with the photograph he told me that he used photoshop to enhance it and that everything he did he tried to make very obvious so it could be traced easly.
 
Creek, Alaska must be crawling with feets. Why don't you take a trip? Bring some with you and show someone in Alaska, whatever that means.

Lt this is a mobile operation for land or on water I built it that way .
The boats tower works just as good on land as on the water .
you could call it a state of the art deer stand it even has a bunk in case I diside to take a nap .
No one has ever built a plateform like this for the reason it was built .
I would love to go up there Lt but I dont even have a way to pull my equipment I dont see that happening for a while . But someday I hope I can make it up there
 
Yes Creek, he did say that to me. He enhanced only the area in question.
I'd think discussion wrt the photo belongs in the moderated thread vs here.

In any event...lets assume for a moment that you know Russo, and he did the only the enhancements as you've roughly outlined. Then there is either another party involved, or someone is lying as the low-res version contains OBVIOUS significant editing including (but not limited to) pixel manipulation and cut/paste changes; all well beyond simple "enhancement".

Of course, part of this discussion (ie. revolving around Russo) would be answered if he replied to my e-mails; at best we are left with your word w/no supporting documentation....and "his" claims that do not jive with obvious facts.
 
You might want to change the above statement, creek.
Google for
correa neto quartzite caves

The hits you'll get - yeah, that's me.

You will also get some hits by changing "quartzite caves" by "hematite" or "haematite".
I googled what you asked but I still dont get it . All I can gather is you think your a cave .
Let me brake this to you as lightly as I can your not a cave .
 
When I talked to John about what he did with the photograph he told me that he used photoshop to enhance it and that everything he did he tried to make very obvious so it could be traced easly.

Thanks for the confirmation that it was an obvious photoshop job.
 
LTC I didn't know that was not known. I thought that was made know from the start.

Maybe you or someone can help me out here. I have made three post on the other thread regurading the photographs and they showed up in green when I posted them and I never saw them again. What's up with that?
 
I did see where PC moved them to the other thread. Why can't I post my comments there? The post I made are not off thread and I didn't discredit or disrespect in any way. I don't understand?
 
I did see where PC moved them to the other thread. Why can't I post my comments there? The post I made are not off thread and I didn't discredit or disrespect in any way. I don't understand?

The other thread is moderated, so your comments cannot be seen until a moderator approves them.

The moderation of that thread should not be circumvented by posting about creekfreak's photographs in other threads, such as this one.

Any further discussion of creekfreak's photographs will be removed from this thread in future.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Last edited:
Thanx Chill, I see it on this morning. I had made a couple of post at about 3 or 4 P.M. yesterday and they still had not made it when I got home last night and I was just wondering. I am still pretty new to this. Thnx again, you do a great job btw.
 
thunder I am still waiting for many of my posts from days ago that where not offencive ether .But then Pc makes a post and his is posted right away I cant figure out why they will not let us talk .
 
Last edited:
thunder I am still waiting for many of my posts from days ago that where not offencive ether .But then Pc makes a post and his is posted right away I cant figure out why they will not let us talk .

Take any further comments on this to the Forum Management section.
 
I googled what you asked but I still dont get it . All I can gather is you think your a cave .
Let me brake this to you as lightly as I can your not a cave .
That was an outstanding display of ignorance.

You don't even know whats a bibliographic citation is.

Researcher, yeah...
 
Could some Bigfoot tracks actually be bear tracks?

Black bear tracks in mud...

bear_track.jpg


Black bear tracks in sand, compared to human...

beartracks2.jpg


Black bear - looking like a mid-tarsal break...

dBearTracks.gif


Black bear...

ma-beartracks.jpg


Grizzly (brown) bear...

beartracks_copy.JPG


Black bear in sand...

bear1.jpg


Black bear in sand...

bear2.jpg


You can find plenty more by Googling 'bear tracks'. There is a vague resemblance to some Bigfoot tracks. But I can't think of any cast Bigfoot prints that very much look like bear tracks. The Freeman Blue Mountain tracks seem to possibly be bear tracks, but there are several factors that point away from that possibility.
 
I'm sorry, the back paw looks like the blue mountain mud footprints you showed above.
The front half of the front paw looks like the Wallace feet



 
I think it's when you get the overstepping of the front and rear feet that you get what looks like a bigfoot track.

In any event, I would say the number of bear tracks that are called bigfoot tracks is going to be small.

What you could also have are bear tracks made into bigfoot tracks by people as part of the hoax.
 
What you could also have are bear tracks made into bigfoot tracks by people as part of the hoax.

I can certainly imagine that happening. The hoaxer faces problems if they try to convert a bear trackway of decent distance (like Freeman's BM mud trackway) to look like Bigfoot. You would have to eliminate many tracks because they don't coincide with a bipedal walker. The bear trackway will generally look quadrupedal even if you convert each paw print to look like big hominoid feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom