Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
xl1.jpg


Yes, but did he also walk with a shorter stride...
 
SweatyYeti said:
I would think that in some cases, a Bigfoot should actually be living somewhere close-by where the footprints have been found.

That is logical....I can't argue with that.
Click to expand...

Then why hasn't this happened ?

I haven't studied the evidence for UFO's....so I can't say how strong the evidence for them really is.
Click to expand...

You'd LOVE it. They have ONLY eyewitness testimony, too.

So....I think the evidence for Bigfoot is as strong, or stronger than the evidence for UFO's.

One reason is simply that it's a little easier for me to believe that an intelligent primate is keeping itself well-hidden in the forests, than it is for me to believe that we're being visited by intelligent primates...or reptiles...or Voltones...from another planet.
Click to expand...

Sweaty, I can understand that. However, it all boils down to an argument from personal incredulity vs personal credulity. That's why "likeliness" and "probabilities" are useless, because they are ultimately subjective. Actual, physical proof is what we need to establish bigfoot's existence. Believe me, I'd be ecstatic if such a new creature were found.

So far, zilch.
 
I would personally accept a sasquatch sighting from certain friends of mine as evidence that they must have seen something very unusual. That has not happened so far, though.

That's different from evidence that the scientific world will accept.
 
SweatyYeti said:
I asked you WHEN I did that, specifically.

Can you provide any examples.....or not?
Click to expand...
Hmmm... Provide examples. Yup, another bell-ringer.

Sweaty, I might've repressed the urge to laugh at that and actually answer your post seriously if you didn't continue to dodge or ignore so many of the questions, posts, and points put to you and acknowledge a few pants-down moments over the last 2 or 3 pages. One of the things that makes you so transparent is not just the questions, posts, and points that you choose to address in some fashion but equally if not more so the things that you avoid alltogether. Just try taking a third perspective and look at some of your exchanges and pay attention to what you pretend isn't there. I think that makes it hard for some people who genuinely do try and give you some slack to continue to do so. You obviously skim through many posts without making any attempt to ponder what people are trying to tell you and simply try to find something, anything to hump and leave the rest. I think that is strong evidence that you're not interested in open-minded discussion and learning on the topic and if you request I'll be more than willing to pull up many examples of that.

That said, here's another straight question I'm hoping isn't too tough for you- What would you consider your motivation for continuing to participate on a braindead babbling, laughable skeptic's board? You've made it clear you find us intellectually inferior so seriously, what's the deal? Is it simply that in being banned from the BFF you hard put to find a replacement? If so, there's plenty of places to go where people would nod their heads and be riveted by all things Joyce. JMHO.
 
LTC8K6 said:
I would personally accept a sasquatch sighting from certain friends of mine as evidence that they must have seen something very unusual. That has not happened so far, though.

That's different from evidence that the scientific world will accept.
Click to expand...
I'm sure Joyce has friends. Hmmm...
 
belz wrote:
SweatyYeti wrote:

I haven't studied the evidence for UFO's....so I can't say how strong the evidence for them really is.
Click to expand...
You'd LOVE it. They have ONLY eyewitness testimony, too.
Click to expand...
They also ONLY have videos of them, ALSO.....or should I say ONLY. :boggled:
 
Organize a large group of qualified (familiar with biological sampling and experienced in field work) searchers, and hie thee to a bigfootery. There should be no possibility of not finding physical evidence, i.e., hair, bones, a corpse, if the persons involved are maginally competent. We have found dead giant squid, and I for one would argue that the habitat of archytuthis is a little bit less accessable than that of bigfoot. Find a piece of a bigfoot or please stop insisting on its existance.
 
SweatyYeti said:
They also ONLY have videos of them, ALSO.....or should I say ONLY. :boggled:
Click to expand...

I see you're only answering the least meaningful part of my post. It's number 3182, in case you forgot.

But, indeed, they have pictures and videos. Most of them faked or naturally explained, all the rest fuzzy and out of focus. You'd swear they do that on purpose.
 
Sasquatch tracks are flat bottomed and often show signs of a double-ball, there is no indication of the longitudal arch found in human footprints. Length of stride varies from four to six feet. (Krantz 1992)
Click to expand...

:D

Might as well have said Sasquatch tracks are made with wood....
 
Last edited:
SweatyYeti said:
I found a wonderful replacement. A new Bigfoot discussion board...
http://www.searchforbigfoot.org/

The moderators there have welcomed me....very warmly...:D

I'll phase on out of here, gradually...and phase into there.
Click to expand...
You....DIDN'T....really answer MY....question.;)

Anyway, enjoy the 'Is Biggie a Giganto or a Homo?', 'How Smart is Biggie?', 'Biggie, Yeti, Yowie: Where Do They Stand?', and 'Hey Dogs, what's the deal?' -type discussions.
 
So here's an interesting conversation I had today. I was speaking with a new colleague of mine today here in Tokyo. Turns out this guy is a wildlife biologist and a fellow Canadian ex-pat. He's Quebecois but did spend a number of years in BC including one or two years at UNBC in Prince George. I mentioned the JREF and the bigfoot discussions here. He's actually a dead ringer for Tube. Anyway, his reaction was absolutely awesome. One eyebrow went up and he just said, "Bigfoot... Yeaaaah, we really just look at what's actually there."

What a doubter, man. I shoulda dropped some Bindernagel on him.:D
 
I was wondering where the pro-Bigfoot JREF posters and many of the BFFers had gone to. There's a new Bigfoot forum clubhouse on the block.

The Search For Bigfoot Forum

It looks pretty nicely designed and has lots of familiar faces. There must have been some reason why these people decided to create a new forum rather than just modify the BFF. One forum section called "Question and Answer" is subtitled "With Jimmy Chilcutt". I guess he's in there doing something. About half of the sections can't be read unless you are registered and signed-in. I'm not sure I would have found this forum without the recent posting here by Baby Dangling.

EDIT: It's nice to see that LAL, Hairy Man & Baby D. have a new home to unwind and enjoy Bigfoot as they should.
 
Last edited:
William Parcher said:
I was wondering where the pro-Bigfoot JREF posters and many of the BFFers had gone to. There's a new Bigfoot forum clubhouse on the block.

The Search For Bigfoot Forum

It looks pretty nicely designed and has lots of familiar faces. There must have been some reason why these people decided to create a new forum rather than just modify the BFF. One forum section called "Question and Answer" is subtitled "With Jimmy Chilcutt". I guess he's in there doing something.
Click to expand...

I was able to see yesterday that Chilcutt had ' 0 ' posts ..

According to the forum guidelines, skepticism is encouraged ..
 
Skepticism encouraged? That's not gonna work very well in their new forum. The warm fuzziness will vanish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom