• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Silly British Conspiraloons

TX50 said:
It is also correct to call it the "Union Jack", even when it isn't worn as
a "jack". Such usage has been sanctioned by both the the Admiralty
and by Parliament.
Click to expand...

No! My source is a TV Science Fictio series about an alien that travels through space and time in a blue box that is bigger on the inside than the outside.

It must be correct!

:D
 
PerryLogan said:
Is there any other group of people in the world with this bizarre mental tic of calling everyone and his brother an agent?

It's the mark of the conspiracy nut, isn;t it? Anyone who disagrees is instantly called a shill or an agent--never with a shred of proof. The CTs obviously see nothing weird or unusual in such behavior, yet it sets them completely apart from any other group you can name.

It's got to be a mental disorder.
Click to expand...

I guess by the nutters standards, 3/4 of the population is working for the gummit. You know, just to cover up the conspiracy for the retarded 1/4 of the population. Makes sense much?
 
Watching them watching us watching them.

Like gladiators circling each other in the colloseum....or not.
 
Ok the conspiracy-crazy thing is catching.

Because skimming that thread makes me want to go buy a shotgun, *plenty* of shells, extra food and water, then board up my house and never come out again.

Just in case those people ever visit this side of the planet.
 
Wow, so all of us are in on it? I haven't gotten my shaddow government check yet. Who do I contact?
 
Well, at least they're trying to come up with answers instead of merely JAQing. They have devised a devious method for cutting steel columns with thermite:
chek said:
one method would be to fill the hollow column with expanding foam (or stuff it with a roll of rock wool), then pour in a bunch of fire ceramic cement. When that sets add thermate to taste, chuck in a detonator (remembering to run the aerial cable out of the column) then maybe add some more cement to taste. The thermate, once ignited will eat through the steel before it eats through the cement). Columns have access panels for bolting, but cutting them with a whell wouldn't be hard either where required.

Solid beams would indeed be harder, but if I can devise a column method I'm sure with plasticised compounds, a pro demo expert could come up with a better method.
Click to expand...
I think Patrick Brown gets credit for originating the idea.
 
"Columns have access panels for bolting, but cutting them with a whell (sic) wouldn't be hard either where required"

"Wouldn't be hard" ?????????? OK, nobody would notice that kind of stuff going on.

I'm guessing these "access panels" panels are to apply bolts/rivets at the box column joints. Wouldn't this put them in the flooring areas?
 
GlennB said:
sshhhhhh ...... they're watching .....

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=5925
Click to expand...

Hey Ian Neal;

If you are lurking here go have a peek at the thread on LC's Nazi coddling. Your movement is moving into political bed with these people. You can ban the people pointing this fact out to you till the cows come home and the pigs start flying; but at the end of the day you are what you do.

So do something you can be proud of for a change. Do what's right and honest.

-z
 
rikzilla said:
Hey Ian Neal;

If you are lurking here go have a peek at the thread on LC's Nazi coddling. Your movement is moving into political bed with these people. You can ban the people pointing this fact out to you till the cows come home and the pigs start flying; but at the end of the day you are what you do.

So do something you can be proud of for a change. Do what's right and honest.

-z
Click to expand...

To be fair, they don't have a clue over there on th UK forum about maintaining "order" <cough>.
Certain critics just post on the General Forum anyway and the mods don't care/notice/have the energy to do anything about it.
And there are one or two quiet sceptic infiltrators who probe at the twoofers on the GF while maintaining their credibility by sounding off once in a while in Critic's Corner.

(hope they don't see this, but I doubt they have the brains to look)
 
well, to keep up the recursion, here's a nice quote:

Pretty sure we had a visit from an MI5 agent at the Lancaster truth event on Thursday 14/12/, said his name was "James", a real smooth young (20's) posh English gent 007 type asked loads of questions about the movement but gave nothing away about himself and left no contact details.

He even said as his intoduction I'm from the intelligence services, jokingly of course!!!!!

If your reading this James perhaps you could tell us what you thought of the evening and put me right if my gut feeling was wrong.
Click to expand...

Now, I know some of our security services may be relaxing certain recruitment criteria - but I still doubt that they'll employ many people who are so thick as to go to spy on a meeting, stand out like a sore thumb, and joke about being from intelligence.

Hell, if we're spending public money on employing agents that blindingly stupid, I want my taxes back...
 
Patrick Brown and Chek have struck out on their own with a new forum called "911 Evidence Base" ( http://www.911evidencebase.co.uk/ )

Here's the "introduction to this forums aims, function and methods":
911 Evidence Base exists in the hope that it may bring some clarity to the world of "911 Truth". Through utilizing a simple process, of submitting evidence which if then accepted for discussion and if proven to be accurate is then added to the archive, we hope to compile a useful resource.

As time passes the chance that evidence will become blurred and distorted is a very real possibility. We can already see this happening with the large amount of airbrushed photos and videos which are appearing on the web. Therefore the creation of archived evidence based reports/articles becomes an imperative.

There are those that through deception and blatant lies strive to discredit the "911 Truth Movement". It therefore becomes the duty of those that can see beyond the propaganda and fiction of the official 911 conspiracy theory to speak out. The official story which states that 19 terrorists armed with box cutters flew two jumbo jets into the twin towers of the world trade center resulting in their collapse is not believed by many. This official story in many instances does not stand up to scrutiny and many people are demanding a more thorough investigation of the events surrounding 911.

The aim of this forum is therefore to stand with the thousands of other websites and millions of people around the world that are demanding an independent and international investigation into the events of 911.
Click to expand...

This is Patrick Brown's 911EB sig:
I personally see the NPT [No Plane Theory] as a circular specious device to confuse readers and pull them into a mire of self-doubt and chaos which in turn will then cause them to stop investigating the events of 911!
Click to expand...

Here is sample thread from 911EB:
Fallious said:
Ok. I'm not entirely sure what this is good for. I started it as a personal examination of the towers proportions and volume, in comparison to the bathtub for some idea of the quantity that was vaporised. I was going to pm it to chek or someone equaly distinguished
icon_wink.gif
for their thoughts, but i've been sitting on it for a few weeks now so I'll go ahead and post it here. I have a feeling my calculations (or statistics) are right out, and I don't have enough info on the core so anyway...

I'm a terrible mathematician - let me tell you that now, but the stuff I've done is not complex, it was just a matter of finding the data and using the good old AxBxC to get the cubic volume.

Let me preface this by saying the majority of sites claim that the Towers are 95% air! I came out with a figure closer to 60%, so I ask folks to check my statistics and maths for me. Tower statistics are available from FEMA and NIST reports and 911research.com.

----------------------------------------------------------

The WTC bathtub is 510 x 980 x 70 feet. I make that a volume of 34,986,000 cubic Feet (CF).

The world trade buildings were 210 x 210 ft wide, by 1,362 feet tall. That's a volume of 60,064,200 CF.

So the volume of each intact building was roughly twice that of the tub. AFIK the floor and height figures are for the entire height of the towers, including the 'submerged' structure. Now I'll try to get an idea of the actual structure volume.

Lets lump the 10 cm thick concrete, trusses and (possible) I Frame into...

[Fallious continues his calculations and analysis through several paragraphs, and at the end lists several points to consider]
Click to expand...
Patrick Brown said:
Sorry “Fallious” but your post has not been accepted for discussion.
Click to expand...
The thread is then locked.
Click to expand...
Obviously, Patrick Brown and Chek have very high standards. The Real Perps are doomed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom