Since you choose to address one statement I made, not very successfully by the way. Other members have already addressed your witness. Am I now to take it that you therefore agree with the rest? In fact since you don't disagree am I to assume you agree with this.
I will amend my "straw man" statements for you to address fully.
WTC 1
8:46:26. There is a massive explosion in the basement of WTC 1. Nobody notices. Except William Rodriguez and the others( as yet unknown persons) who heard what they thought sounded like explosions a few seconds before the plane hit. Although this as been thoroughly explained to you, you still refuse to accept it. At this point there as been no plane hit anywhere and no attack is underway. But it is recorded by seismologists.
So, Rodriguez and company don't know an explosion coming from below as opposed to one coming from above?
Well, what was the explosion he heard a few moments later that sounded like it came from way-high above?
That's two explosions with an interval of time in between. Did Rodriguez lie about the second explosion? Was it an echo? Was it jet fuel fire continuing to snake it's way through the building? (The Ginny Carr audiotape indicates it was about 9.2 seconds later.)
On another item, I don't have to show LDEO was synched to UTC. NIST acquired the services of LDEO's Dr. Kim in 2005 to "firm up" their bogus 8:46:30 time of "impact". So, by inference, NIST qualified the seismic to UTC. (Either that or NIST is wrong, which is not palpable to you).
The official 9/11 story has a problem:
NIST comes out with its time for WTC1 at 8:46:30; however, the FAA had one last radar signal from AA Flt 11 that occurred at 8:46:40, when it disappeared in front of the controller's eyes. To whomever asked for the flight study, it's in the report (if you could only read), but here it is again:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc01.pdf
That's still 10 seconds difference in the world of precision timing, all backed by numerous witnesses.
Remember when I said there is more information out there to cast reasonable doubt on the official 9/11 story?
Forgive me for getting off topic, but why don't you chew on this, since so many Americans are being played for suckers by Bush and by those who control him. Here is more evidence of the inside job, uncontested facts that have been essentially buried by the US media:
http://www.gnn.tv/articles/2558/Five_Years...ory_Falls_Apart
Five Years Later: The Official Story Falls Apart
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:38:41 -070 by Sander Hicks
EXCERPT.......
---------------------
The most relevant example of the whole guilty lot of them is Richard Armitage. In 1989, he couldn’t get a job in President Bush the First’s Department of State, because of his odious Defense Department work with Iran/Contra criminal Oliver North. Skip ahead a scant 12 years later, to the summer of 2001: Armitage sails into a position as Assistant Secretary of State, without a peep from the media or Senate Foreign Relations Committee. After a lifetime in CIA/DIA circles, Armitage happens to hold the highest civilian decoration from the Pakistani military, and has deep social ties there, from his work in the Afghan/Soviet civil war.
Remember that one? That was the 1979-1988 operation where bin Laden, the Mujahedeen, and the Pakistani intelligence group, ISI, were used as proxies for the U.S. military, a mix that later created the Taliban, which helped create Al Qaeda. The 9/11 Commission Report distored all this, because it’s at the core of understanding 9/11.
Also noticeably missing from the Report is Richard Armitage’s close relationship to the Pakistani funders of 9/11. The Report incredibly states that discovering the funding for 9/11 is “of little practical significance.” However, the FBI, the Wall Street Journal, and the Times of India have all acknowledged that Pakistani ISI Chief Mahmood Ahmad wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta on Sept. 10, 2001. Ahmad had met extensively that May with the State Department’s Richard Armitage, and CIA Director George Tenet, in Pakistan. On the morning of 9/11, Ahmad was in D.C., meeting with Representative (and later CIA director) Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham. When news of Mahmood Ahmad’s wire transfer reached his home country, he was let go, a month after 9/11. The Pakistani ISI works very closely with the U.S. State Department, and handlers like Armitage. Ahmad was fired quietly, when he should have been arrested, extradited, and served up to the American public as a culprit for the attacks. Remember how high the passions flared in October, 2001? Instead, the whole incident was buried. Ahmad walked.
Asia Times called the Ahmad scandal 9/11’s “real smoking gun.” There’s been zero coverage in the U.S. media. The White House edited Ahmad’s name out of the official transcript, the one time Condi Rice was asked about the scandal at a press conference. Instead of prosecuting Ahmad, the U.S. gave Pakistan an aid package of $3 billion over five years, right after 9/11.
---------------------
These are known facts. The CIA has been working through Pakistan's ISI with Al Qaeda all along. The funding of same has been done through the opium trade. This has been going on since the beginning when the CIA set up Al Qaeda back in the '80s during the Afghan-Soviet War. THIS HAS NEVER STOPPED.
Yes, the US gov't WAS highly involved in 9/11. It is the linchpin for the "War on Terrorism"--a "war" that is a total fabrication with no end, a means to global hegemony & empire, and is Satanic in nature as is the New World Order. Unfortunately, most of America has been dumbed-down, and as a result, the hatred for America has grown immeasurably throughout the world because of crimes of war, aggression, and torture.
Or maybe you just like your government lying to you all the time?
Research the above excerpt from Sander's article for yourself and learn what a sucker you've been.
And if you don't, well, you simply prove the point about being a sucker.
Remember, real patriots are for America AND the truth.
