• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Just once, I'd like to see a definition of "Conservative" which has more of a basis in reality, rather than as a convenient catch-all for greed, stupidity, and intellectual cowardice.

Please don´t take this personally, but... just once I´d like to see those who claim others aren´t really X to call out these "false" X´s and/or throw them out of the X-group, rather than complaining about being lumped together with them.

As long as "real conservatives" allow people like Limbaugh, Coulter or Beck to call themselves conservatives and spread their venom under the uncontested label of conservatism, I see nothing wrong with calling these venom-spewers conservatives, and I have little sympathy with "real conservatives" who don´t like to be associated with the venom-spewers, but don´t do anything about them, either.
 
Please don´t take this personally, but... just once I´d like to see those who claim others aren´t really X to call out these "false" X´s and/or throw them out of the X-group, rather than complaining about being lumped together with them.

As long as "real conservatives" allow people like Limbaugh, Coulter or Beck to call themselves conservatives and spread their venom under the uncontested label of conservatism, I see nothing wrong with calling these venom-spewers conservatives, and I have little sympathy with "real conservatives" who don´t like to be associated with the venom-spewers, but don´t do anything about them, either.
OOo great. Using that idiotic logic you can dismiss the environmentalist movement, animal welfare movement, and just about anything you can imagine because there are whackjobs in it.
 
OOo great. Using that idiotic logic you can dismiss the environmentalist movement, animal welfare movement, and just about anything you can imagine because there are whackjobs in it.
Beck and Limbaugh are among the leading media voices of the Conservative movement. Coulter will return when she needs to sell a new book.
 
I'm actually really glad to hear that. Who are you referring to and what have they said?
Unsurprisingly, no reply from dudalb, who apparently thinks that self-proclaimed centrism means a free pass from the expectation that claims be supported.
I am being driven insane by the atitude that is so common in the Politics forum that "Everyone on my side is intelligent and/or reasonable, but Everyone on the other side is stupid and/or crazy". In other words, all the extremists are on the OTHER side.
Blah blah blah.
 
As long as "real conservatives" allow people like Limbaugh, Coulter or Beck to call themselves conservatives and spread their venom under the uncontested label of conservatism, I see nothing wrong with calling these venom-spewers conservatives, and I have little sympathy with "real conservatives" who don´t like to be associated with the venom-spewers, but don´t do anything about them, either.

Same logic:

"As long as "real muslims" allow people like Taliban and Al-Qaeda to call themselves muslims and spread their venom under the uncontested label of Islam, I see nothing wrong with calling these venom-spewers muslims, and I have little sympathy with "real muslims" who don´t like to be associated with the venom-spewers, but don´t do anything about them, either."

Do the same substitutions for "blacks" and "Jews", and then come back and defend your prejudice.
 
No doubt the same experts CBS used to authenticate the Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian documents regarding Bush 43.

I am going to go ahead and tell you thats irrelevant. You didn't like the message that the rally drew less than 100K so you attacked the messenger. When your attack was pointed out to be irrelevant you decide to go even further away from the subject at hand.

Drawing almost 100K people is way more than I could do, no need to obfuscate the number.
 
Last edited:
What did airphotoslive.com report to CBS about the crowd size at Al Sharpton's rally and when will CBS report these findings?

Maybe they weren't hired to do that. Maybe Beck's rally was much bigger. The only thing airphotoslive did was take photos. That you have so much vitriol for them is unreasonable.

Beck brought in numbers that william jennings bryant would be proud of.
 
What did airphotoslive.com report to CBS about the crowd size at Al Sharpton's rally and when will CBS report these findings?

And what Relevance does that have towards how many people appeared at Beck's rally?

Or are you (still) just JAQing off?
 
Same logic:

"As long as "real muslims" allow people like Taliban and Al-Qaeda to call themselves muslims and spread their venom under the uncontested label of Islam, I see nothing wrong with calling these venom-spewers muslims, and I have little sympathy with "real muslims" who don´t like to be associated with the venom-spewers, but don´t do anything about them, either."


I have no problem with that statement, in fact I agree wholeheartedly that the biggest problem with Islamic extremism is that so called moderates tend to excuse it or give implicit support.

Do the same substitutions for "blacks" and "Jews", and then come back and defend your prejudice.


The case for conservatives and Islamic extremists giving implicit support to nut jobs only to deny the association when called out is a good deal more developed then just identifying a group and pointing to radicals within it. The key (though perhaps not the only) difference is that the leaders of the nutjobs directly or indirectly carry significant weight within the group being discussed.
 
I am going to go ahead and tell you thats irrelevant. You didn't like the message that the rally drew less than 100K so you attacked the messenger. When your attack was pointed out to be irrelevant you decide to go even further away from the subject at hand.

Drawing almost 100K people is way mare than I could do, no need to obfuscate the number.

How is CBS's shaky record for reliable news irrelevant? Did you forget that Katie Couric is their news anchor? What message was CBS sending when they hired airphotoslive.com to get a quick estimate of crows size at Beck's rally, but not Sharpoton's rally? How do we know what time of day airphotoslive took their pictures?

You don't have a problem that SkyNews and Montanaro came up with a different number than CBS, do you?

"Around 500,000 American conservatives have held a controversial rally at the place where Martin Luther King made his famous "I Have A Dream" speech". Rob Cole, Sky News Online

NBC News's Domenico Montanaro Tweeted that it might have been 325,000

BTW: Curt Westergard, owner of airphotoslive, Twitter buddies include Moore, Gore & Huffington.
 
How is CBS's shaky record for reliable news irrelevant? Did you forget that Katie Couric is their news anchor? What message was CBS sending when they hired airphotoslive.com to get a quick estimate of crows size at Beck's rally, but not Sharpoton's rally? How do we know what time of day airphotoslive took their pictures?
What does Katie Couric have to do with anything?

Maybe because Sharpton's rally was a much smaller event and they aren't claiming a million people like Michell Bachman is.

They took their pictures at the height of the event.

You don't have a problem that SkyNews and Montanaro came up with a different number than CBS, do you?

"Around 500,000 American conservatives have held a controversial rally at the place where Martin Luther King made his famous "I Have A Dream" speech". Rob Cole, Sky News Online

NBC News's Domenico Montanaro Tweeted that it might have been 325,000

BTW: Curt Westergard, owner of airphotoslive, Twitter buddies include Moore, Gore & Huffington.
If SkyNews and Montanaro can say how they arrived at that estimate and their methodology pans out then I'll go with them. Until then, it appears they just pulled it out of there arse.
 
As long as "real conservatives" allow people like Limbaugh, Coulter or Beck to call themselves conservatives and spread their venom under the uncontested label of conservatism, I see nothing wrong with calling these venom-spewers conservatives, and I have little sympathy with "real conservatives" who don´t like to be associated with the venom-spewers, but don´t do anything about them, either.

As long as people like Newt or that orange-skinned freak from Ohio stoop to being guests on the Rushblob's or Hannity's or Beck's radio or TV shows, screw them. They might as well duck tape themselves to the whackjobs.
 
Maybe because Sharpton's rally was a much smaller event and they aren't claiming a million people like Michell Bachman is

Are you saying that CBS new in advance that Sharpton's rally would not require the services of airphotoslive, but Beck's rally would in order to determine crowd size?

They took their pictures at the height of the event.

What evidence do you have of this?
 
Are you saying that CBS new in advance that Sharpton's rally would not require the services of airphotoslive, but Beck's rally would in order to determine crowd size?

Well, duh. Who didn't know that Beck's rally would be an order of magnitude larger than Sharpton's? :confused:

What evidence do you have of this?

*sigh* Here you go.

AirPhotosLive.com gave its estimate a margin of error of 9,000, meaning between 78,000 and 96,000 people attended the rally. The photos used to make the estimate were taken at noon Saturday, which is when the company estimated was the rally's high point.
 
Last edited:
David Frum is one Conservative who has a very low opinion of Beck, and does Patty Noonan. In fact The Weekly Standard has been consistently critical of Beck.
I think Beck's "Teddy Roosevelt was a Commie" routine was where many conservatives split the blanket with him.
 
Are you saying that CBS new in advance that Sharpton's rally would not require the services of airphotoslive, but Beck's rally would in order to determine crowd size?



What evidence do you have of this?

Just to be clear, are you a supporter of Beck?
Do you really think that Teddy Roosevelt was a Socialist?
Do you really buy into Beck's Conspiracy Theories?
I ask because you seem unwilling to ever admit that, just maybe, the right has it's share of crazies.
 
The key (though perhaps not the only) difference is that the leaders of the nutjobs directly or indirectly carry significant weight within the group being discussed.
And therefore all members within the group follow the extremists... But thanks for coming back an attempting to defend your bigotry.
 
Are you saying that CBS new in advance that Sharpton's rally would not require the services of airphotoslive, but Beck's rally would in order to determine crowd size?



What evidence do you have of this?

Cleon answered you.

I'm still waiting on the methodology used by Sky News and Montanaro. Any luck there?
 

Back
Top Bottom