richardm
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- Messages
- 9,248
radiating-sunflower said:
Hey u back
Oh yes
If that was the case i would be a wealthy woman, I would have sued codine etc manufacturers.
Well, codeine does work as a painkiller. It might not have been sufficiently potent for your requirements, and it might have left you hooked. But it has nevertheless undergone plenty of trials - proper, double-blind ones - and has been shown to work.
Come on not treallyi n the same context, we live in rip off britain for one, nothing works(ahem MR gates) as such it either muddles through, disgusies it.
Well, perhaps. But there's a difference, I think, between selling something that you know has flaws, and selling something that just plain doesn't work. If you brought a Windows CD home and found that it was actually an empty box, you'd hightail it back to the shop and demand your money back, and quite rightly. The "Rip-off Britain" we read about is more to do with us paying twice as much for our empty boxes as people do elsewhere
What should be protected is there should be more information available and more medical help and more qualifed people to give support .
Absolutely...
Yes there are schemers out there they should be smacked and sent to bed with no tea but, homeopathy works for a lot of people regulate the industry, learn about it and study it to find out why it helps people would be a far better road to take than no its water ban it that only serves to casue detrimental effect those in need. This is one thing you cant dismiss it is one of those feel good things how can yu measure or assess that?
The problems are that 1) There have already been plenty of studies on homeopathy that show it has no clinical value (which is why it is no longer mainstream). 2) Just because it might make people feel good doesn't mean you should pretend that it is making them better. Pretending that it is is not nice, I think.