CIT has been dedicated to providing independent verifiable evidence demonstrating the
true flight path of the Pentagon attack jet which ultimately proves it could not have hit the building as reported. See
this thread for details.
But is the government story flight path as shown in the official data, reports, and required by the physical damage even physically possible?
Pilots for 9/11 Truth released an
article earlier this year demonstrating how the final leg of the official flight path is in fact mathematically impossible for a 757 or any transport aircraft for that matter.
Unfortunately the article was released with an error that was quickly noted by other members as well as detractors who came out with their own interpretations of this scenario and the problem presented.
As any honest scientist/professional would do, Pilots for 9/11 Truth quickly admitted the error and promised an update with corrected math.
Since the issue had become convoluted with so many people offering up alternative scenarios.....P4T determined it would be best to put out a video presentation not only with the corrected math, but also with complete animations with scale topography for accurate demonstrations along with completely addressing all of the alternative or "debunking" scenarios in detail and showing exactly WHY
they are wrong.
They have done this and as it turns out, the entire premise of the initial article holds true and the "debunkers" have been shown to be disingenuous at best or blatantly deceiving at worst.
The 2006 NTSB data or alleged "black box" has the flight path directly over the VDOT tower as shown here:
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/VDOTAntennaAerial.jpg[/qimg]
This makes the final descent to light pole number 1 with the necessary pull up to be perfectly low and level to the ground as shown in the Pentagon security video and required by all physical damage observably fishy to the layman but physically impossible to the scientist.
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/VDOTAntennaDescentAngle2.jpg[/qimg]
The scenario is especially irreconcilable with the evidence when considering the values reported by the NTSB particularly for speed, altitude, and g forces.
This really holds the government to their word as far as what the plane allegedly did and the pseudo-skeptic/government apologists out there seem to think that this official information can simply be dismissed when coming up with excuses for their impossible story.
Of course that is the ultimate cop out. This is the required descent if the officially reported altitude is used:
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/cgi%20povs/FDR_Pent_Alt1_ab.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/cgi%20povs/pentanimxox1rt.gif[/qimg]
But it is STILL impossible even if we hypothetically lower the plane to the top of the highest obstacle on the official flight path!
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/cgi%20povs/VDOT_Pent_Alt_ab.jpg[/qimg]
There is no way a 757 would be able to withstand more than 5 or 6 G's. But the highest G rate recorded in the NTSB data for this stretch is only 1.75 G's for a mere 1/8th of a second!
This 13 minute excerpt from Pilots for 9/11 Truth's latest release,
9/11: ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON, is really enough in itself to prove a military deception in Arlington that day.
So to all the pseudo-skeptics who have repeated the mantra
"got math?" since the initial article came out with the error.....the answer is:
Sure do! And it proves your official 9/11 fantasy false.
Watch 13 minute short here
.
