September Stundie Nominations

Well, Billy Rea continues his utterly baffling obsession with the stundies, and in the process manages to again generate another side splitter.

From the LC Board:

Billy Rea says: “You know what, I've seen the gracious response from the people over here regarding that error and it really puts the J**Fian mindset into context.”

Hmm, odd but not Stundie worthy until we see the “gracious” response to which he was referring:

“Wow an admission/concession from a 'refer. I think hell just froze over.”

Even better, read some of the other gracious comments in that call out thread attacking Uruk! http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/653809/1/

Good work Billy, the hypocrisy drips off of you like a thundershower.
 
""The fire fighter who took us down kept saying do not look down. And I kept saying why.
"He said do not look down. And we're stepping over people and you know you could feel when you're stepping over people."

The inference that there were bodies on the floor is explicit.


I do not think those words mean what he thinks they mean....




in·fer /ɪnˈfɜr/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[in-fur] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -ferred, -fer·ring.
–verb (used with object)
1. to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence: They inferred his displeasure from his cool tone of voice.
2. (of facts, circumstances, statements, etc.) to indicate or involve as a conclusion; lead to.
3. to guess; speculate; surmise.
4. to hint; imply; suggest.
–verb (used without object)
5. to draw a conclusion, as by reasoning.

ex·plic·it /ɪkˈsplɪsɪt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ik-splis-it] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. fully and clearly expressed or demonstrated; leaving nothing merely implied; unequivocal: explicit instructions; an explicit act of violence; explicit language.
2. clearly developed or formulated: explicit knowledge; explicit belief.
3. definite and unreserved in expression; outspoken: He was quite explicit as to what he expected us to do for him.
4. described or shown in realistic detail: explicit sexual scenes.
5. having sexual acts or nudity clearly depicted: explicit movies; explicit books.
6. Mathematics. (of a function) having the dependent variable expressed directly in terms of the independent variables, as y = 3x + 4. Compare implicit (def. 4).
 
I do not think those words mean what he thinks they mean....

Not really Stundie-worthy, IMO. Lots of people get those two words mixed up, and the quote doesn't really illustrate the CT mindset. However, when his error was pointed out to him by me and Johnny karate in some detail, he showed his true Twoofer colors by refusing to admit it. Unfortunately that's harder to capture in a Stundie-quote.
 
Looks like they disappeared it, but am I reading that right?

"The key word is that World Trade 7 fell BEFORE the first plane hit."

WoW...

That is what it says, but yeah... it doesn't come through well on the forum.

Here's an enlarged version that will hopefully make it clearer.

WoWStundiefinal.jpg


ETA: Izzat better?
 
Last edited:
Not really Stundie-worthy, IMO. Lots of people get those two words mixed up, and the quote doesn't really illustrate the CT mindset. However, when his error was pointed out to him by me and Johnny karate in some detail, he showed his true Twoofer colors by refusing to admit it. Unfortunately that's harder to capture in a Stundie-quote.



I think you're discussing the infer/imply issue, which if you search on definitions, the dictionaries seem to be on the fence about. I'm interested in how he thinks an implication/inference can be explicit, as opposed to implicit. No matter your opinion on infer/imply, both have connotations that the conclusions must be derived from the evidence (the statement, in this case), because they are not explicitly stated, which is what he claimed. If he had said the inference was implicit in the statement, I would have agreed with him.

Maybe not Stundie worthy, that's for the Dictator and the Voters to decide, but certainly a silly statement.
 
cleft asunder said:
Thread title: The 4 most famous artists were Reptilians.

Michelangelo, Leonardo, Donatello, Raphael. Where do I get this idea? The Teengage Mutant Ninja turtles. Insignificant? Not at all. The truth is thrown in our face so accurately, that we really need to figure out why they do it. It's been getting on my nerves lately because I see it everywhere. In video games, in movies, paintings, and writtings.

(etc.)

From The David Icke Forums. Where else?
 
I think you're discussing the infer/imply issue, which if you search on definitions, the dictionaries seem to be on the fence about. I'm interested in how he thinks an implication/inference can be explicit, as opposed to implicit. No matter your opinion on infer/imply, both have connotations that the conclusions must be derived from the evidence (the statement, in this case), because they are not explicitly stated, which is what he claimed. If he had said the inference was implicit in the statement, I would have agreed with him.

Maybe not Stundie worthy, that's for the Dictator and the Voters to decide, but certainly a silly statement.

I'm guessing that Radical Logic will produce something funnier than that before the month is over.:)


He seems to be getting rather loose in what he considers to be a reptillian.
 
AA77 and the Blue Angels:



Never mind a hammerhead stall or a plugged barrel roll, try a lazy slowly descending turn instead!

:) i hope i win

btw, tis came actually from the German Pilots Assosiation (Cockpit)
 
Reading this I had no idea my jaw could drop so low...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread392408/pg1


If forced to I will nominate dgtempe for this bit of delusional weirdness regarding Mr. Icke

As for me, i am listening to him a whole lot more now because he is starting to make very good sense and now, those interdimensional beings he speaks of that are ultimatly at the top of the pyramid running the world, or that there's a being with a joystick playing us all...well, it doesnt seem so farfetched anymore.
As far as Reptillians, well, i wouldnt eliminate that theory either. We dont know anything, really.
All we know is what he is telling us and we are seeing such things happen everyday
Who knows were we REALLY ARE?????

Its really frightning, isnt it.

Inter-dimensional beings, and pyramids, and reptilians... Oh My!
 
Last edited:
If we can get proper context, I nominate pretty much everything previous Stundie Winner FadeTooBlack posted in this thread:

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=214&topic=45449316

Highlights:

You're sadly mistaken if you believe this. He was just playing dumb and so is anybody else if they didn't know what I meant. Who cares about a billionaires wife who is answering questions that she already knew she was gonna be asked, about stuff that had nothing to do with the Rothchild affairs? She's just paying for her time on TV because she thinks she's beautiful.

That like saying, "the Bush's".... You know good an well no one is talking about Bush's wife, she is meaningless.

And

- In 1910, Senator Aldrich and a bunch of the worlds leading bankers united in secrecy on Jekyll Island just outside of Georgia to discuss the development of the Federal Reserve. Reps from Rockefeller, JP Morgan, and Rothchilds just to name a few.

- The other "powerful" men; Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidor Strauss and John Jacob Astor IV in particular, OPPOSED the formation of the Federal Reserve and were powerful enough to stop it's formation.

- The Titanic set sail through "clear waters" in 1912.

- Those three men I mentioned above just happen to be on the Titanic.

- In 1913 the Federal Reserve was born.

Coincidence? Maybe.

And of course:

It's not actually a secret at all, it is well known documented actual historical event. It just that the event was so exclusive (to just those who were present) it was called a "secret meeting" at the time.

Why do you think "Jekyll Island" is used so much in children stories and amusement parks, and other things? Why do you think the story of the Titanic never dies and never will? It's a signal to an important historical event that changed our lives forever.
 
Trying to do a little research, but what children's literature incorporates "Jekyll Island?" A search of all kinds of terms into google winds up with nothing except Glory and a few other movies shooting some of the footage on location there.

I mean obviously dude is a nutcase, but is he making the case based on "Dr. Jekyll," which was written 25 years before this secret meeting which was so secret it's discussed at length in every article written about the place?

Wait... am I really trying to make sense of a gamefaqs post? What the hell is wrong with me? :boxedin:
 

Back
Top Bottom