September Stundie Nominations

I'm putting this one in more as a superb example of lying than a traditional Stundie. RedIbis claimed he had a document claiming that the FBI had no evidence of what planes crashed on 9-11. When it was pointed out that his letter wasn't from the FBI, it was from the NTSB, he replied:



Because the letter must have been from both of them, presumably.

Dave

It's been quite a while since I've had a nomination. Here's hoping I take the prize. Especially since my offhand comment wasn't as far off the mark as you'd wish.

The NTSB letter was part of the FBI foi response. A simple error but one which you will no doubt get some pleasure out of, and will perhaps bring home first prize.

This speaks for itself:

The case agent stated that since the identities of the four hijacked aircraft have never been in question by the FBI, NTSB or FAA (evidence collected after September 11, 2001 has corroborated the fact that American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Flight 93 were the aircraft hijacked), no records would have been generated responsive to plaintiffs request for documents.

Bolded for lapped up anti-skepticism and the source of my initial confusion. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
 
It's been quite a while since I've had a nomination. Here's hoping I take the prize. Especially since my offhand comment wasn't as far off the mark as you'd wish.

The NTSB letter was part of the FBI foi response. A simple error but one which you will no doubt get some pleasure out of, and will perhaps bring home first prize.


Um, no, the NTSB letter was not "part of the FBI foi response" and you deliberately cherrypicked the NTSB letter to attribute it to the FBI when it was as plain as day that it was not. The NTSB letter was - clearly and unambiguously - part of a separate FOIA request to the NTSB, not the FBI. Surely, you cannot be so obtuse and so reading challenged as this!

Personally, I don't think your deliberately misleading and dishonest posts on that thread are worthy of a Stundie award, and I doubt that you will make the finals.

But I do find it - fascinating isn't quite the right word - that you continue to lie here about your lies on another thread. :boggled:
 
Dave, on the WTC7 report, from the comments on infowars:


Dave
August 22,2008

"This farce of a report only reinforces the fact that this was an inside job. I guess we’re making too much noise and it scares them. You can tell that this report is complete propaganda from the first sentence. Also why did they keep calling it 7 World Trade Center? Seems like they don’t wan’t the regular keywords to show up so only people who doubt the story will read the article. Otherwise, they don’t even want the public to hear about it. If the center beam of the building was weakened that would be the last beam that would cause a collapse because it is the most supported collumn in a rectangular structure. The Masons know this. They are geometry experts and they try to pass this crap off to the american public. Start gathering your guns, because the revolution is coming soon. There’s no other option. These people are lying, evil scumbags."

source:http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-wt...mpletely-flawed.html/comment-page-2/#comments


I'm confident that at least one of those points is a stundie.
 
Dave, on the WTC7 report, from the comments on infowars:


Dave
August 22,2008

"This farce of a report only reinforces the fact that this was an inside job. I guess we’re making too much noise and it scares them. You can tell that this report is complete propaganda from the first sentence. Also why did they keep calling it 7 World Trade Center? Seems like they don’t wan’t the regular keywords to show up so only people who doubt the story will read the article. Otherwise, they don’t even want the public to hear about it. If the center beam of the building was weakened that would be the last beam that would cause a collapse because it is the most supported collumn in a rectangular structure. The Masons know this. They are geometry experts and they try to pass this crap off to the american public. Start gathering your guns, because the revolution is coming soon. There’s no other option. These people are lying, evil scumbags."

source:http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-wt...mpletely-flawed.html/comment-page-2/#comments


I'm confident that at least one of those points is a stundie.


If I can make a suggestion, it would be the highlighted sentences. Awesome.
 
I nominate this for the First Annual Zaphod Grammar Nazi Award (FAZGNA):

I could care less what either of you think, personally.

What Confuseling means to say is that they couldn't care less what either of you think, personally. The care-o-meter reads zero. They could not care less than that.

I, on the other hand, desperately hope some of you found this post amusing.

Also: both (.001 x zero) and (.001% of zero) is zero again. This is to say, in about 10 years, "truther math" will get far easier.

Forgive a lame joke. In TheLoneBedouin's defense, he is not the only one to make a math error on the referenced thread.
 
Last edited:
AboveTopSecret has donated another one. This is from a thread about Pearl Harbor being a 'false flag' operation.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread389146/pg1


This is from Interestinggg
Well I know and have spoken to people who were there on that day.
And Japanese planes surely bombed everything.
However who's to say they were actually Japanese in them?
Except for the fact that they had Japanese signs on them and the ones that crashed had Japanese pilots in them.

Seriously?
 
The stupid in that Pearl Harbor thread hurts.

I sort of like this quote though:

Here are some words of wisdom: Don't believe all conspiracy theorists, but have confidence in investigative reporters such as Jim Marrs and George Knapp.


:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp
 
Last edited:
Dave, on the WTC7 report, from the comments on infowars:


Dave
August 22,2008

"This farce of a report only reinforces the fact that this was an inside job. I guess we’re making too much noise and it scares them. You can tell that this report is complete propaganda from the first sentence. Also why did they keep calling it 7 World Trade Center? Seems like they don’t wan’t the regular keywords to show up so only people who doubt the story will read the article. Otherwise, they don’t even want the public to hear about it. If the center beam of the building was weakened that would be the last beam that would cause a collapse because it is the most supported collumn in a rectangular structure. The Masons know this. They are geometry experts and they try to pass this crap off to the american public. Start gathering your guns, because the revolution is coming soon. There’s no other option. These people are lying, evil scumbags."

source:http://www.prisonplanet.com/nist-wt...mpletely-flawed.html/comment-page-2/#comments


I'm confident that at least one of those points is a stundie.

Yep, right there. My Dad was a Mason but the only reason he was an expert in geometry was because he was a mason.;)
 
9q8swi.jpg

Link

....yes, NIST invented thermal expansion. He also thinks the R.Mackey paper he was linked to is from NIST.
 
I nominate Zaphod for the "Not Getting the Joke by Failing to Read Earlier Parts of the Thread Award". May he forever hang his head in unfortunate acronym saddled infamy. ;)

[unless that was a joke too. In which case it went over my head, and in the spirit of award inflation, I nominate myself for everything :)]
 
Last edited:
I've stripped out the posts which involved bickering with and by TheLoneBedouin and sent them to AAH. Please stay on topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
I've stripped out the posts which involved bickering with and by TheLoneBedouin and sent them to AAH. Please stay on topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady

Thank you, thank you, thank you.:)
 
[qimg]http://i36.tinypic.com/9q8swi.jpg[/qimg]
Link

....yes, NIST invented thermal expansion. He also thinks the R.Mackey paper he was linked to is from NIST.
I know several mildly scorched nephilim who'd like a word with that fellow.
 
If I am submitting to many just tell me to stop! We might want to consider banning submissions from ATS. That place is a gold mine. Every time I find one it leads to a better one and so one until an hour has passed and I need to get some work done! So here is my third for this month from a thread on the Matrix and 9/11 connection. Neo's pasport expires on 9.11.01 and that of course means something to twoofers but wait there is even more!!!

From The Piemaker -

Interesting that 3/11 was also mentioned in the films. that date links to the Madrid bombings. The date listed was 3/11/1962, 42 years prior to the Madrid bombings. I suppose a link could be made with the number 42 and George W Bush, since he is the 42nd person to be president.

I suppose the link could be made if GWB was the 42nd president... Wait I got it.
Madrid 3.11.04
Neo's B-day 3.11.62

42 year difference.

31,162 - 31,104 = 58

58 + 42 =100 drop the two zeros and you get 1

1 + 42 = 43 which is GWB!!!

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread382630/pg4
 
Mental disabillity may disqualify this entry, but it's too funny not to share:

JonThm(from comments) said:
You breathe out He and CH4 dude. As your blood system does molecular nuclear fusion.

I can't even begin to understand the series of misconceptions that led to this belief.

He seems quite obsessed with the idea that boiling water "does molecular nuclear fusion", which gives of gamma rays and heat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEOt42wKNeY
 
Mental disabillity may disqualify this entry, but it's too funny not to share:



I can't even begin to understand the series of misconceptions that led to this belief.

He seems quite obsessed with the idea that boiling water "does molecular nuclear fusion", which gives of gamma rays and heat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEOt42wKNeY

"Molecular nuclear fusion"?

Are Truthers just inventing new meanings for words now?

...oh wait...they've been doing that since "pull it". :D
 
"Molecular nuclear fusion"?

Are Truthers just inventing new meanings for words now?

...oh wait...they've been doing that since "pull it". :D

Hey, if rational people like us can just "invent" new stuff like "thermal expansion", obviously they get to make stuff up too right?
 

Back
Top Bottom